The @HouseJudiciary report also sheds more light on the fact that family separation was the goal of the Trump administration from Day One.
High-level administration officials met to begin planning separations within a month of Trump taking office, and floated plans to CNN.
Within six months of taking office, the Trump administration had begun a family separation "pilot project" in El Paso.
Despite separating 281 families during a four-month period, the Trump administration never disclosed the project to the agency in charge of childrens' shelters.
As the hundreds of families were being separated, one high-level official in the Office of Refugee Resettlement wrote to his boss in alarm.
"We had a shortage last night of beds for babies."
By the time the Trump administration rolled out Zero Tolerance, more than 1,000 children had already been separated from their families.
Fifty children under the age of 5 were separated in that period, including four under the age of 1.
The administration moved forward anyway.
When Jeff Sessions announced Zero Tolerance, DHS ordered CBP to refer parents for prosecution—which meant children would be taken away.
The policy was rolled out chaotically, with individual Border Patrol sectors setting their own policies about separating small children.
While Zero Tolerance was going on, Border Patrol officers often treated children and families with contempt, as documented by extensive complaints.
Reports revealed children taken away without a chance to say goodbye and an 8-year-old kicked to wake him up.
When children were taken away from their parents so cruelly, they broke down pyschologically and physically.
Shelter operators reported horror stories, including children who'd wake up screaming in the middle of the night and others who "could barely eat or sleep for weeks."
As the outrage against family separation mounted, Trump administration officials struggled to even set up communication between parents and children.
By this point, the El Paso Pilot Project had begun nearly a year earlier, and yet there was still no system in place to reunify.
The chaos ran through the system. When one South Texas judge ordered CBP to maintain lists of separated parents, they couldn't even do that. So the judge threatened to hold them in contempt.
Agents panicked: "A Border Patrol agent exclaimed, I ain’t going to jail!!!!!!!!!!!!!'"
When the Trump administration finally ended Zero Tolerance, ICE began the process of trying to reunify parents still in ICE custody with their children. But again they ran into the same problems they'd had for almost a year—there were no systems linking parents with kids.
It was clear no plan existed to reunify families, even days before a court order.
"On June 23, 2018, ORR Director Lloyd emailed ICE ERO, stating, "'[j]ust writing to find out if you have any intel on ICE plans for the separated parents. Give me a call when you get a chance.'"
Because there had never been any real plan to reunite parents with their children, after a court ordered the Trump administration to do so, the situation quickly "devolved into chaos."
Kids were stuck on buses overnight, sent to the wrong place, and ICE missed deadlines.
By August, most families had been reunited. But as @HouseJudiciary's report makes clear, hundreds of children remain separated from their parents, because the parents were deported without their children as a result of a cruel and chaotic policy.
It must never happen again.
Much of the information included in this report has been revealed before, though there are some new bits of information, like McAleenan's brief attempt to restart Zero Tolerance prosecutions after a court order halting separations.
If you've gone through this thread and want to read even more about the horrors of family separation and how the policy was rolled out, I also suggest reading @jacobsoboroff's excellent new book, "Separated," which covers much of this topic in extensive detail.
The @HouseJudiciary report is excellent, but there's so much more that could have been covered, because there was just so much cruelty.
Because the report is an overview, it doesn't get into all of the horrific stories it could. But there were just so many.
I remember shaking with anger and sadness when summarizing this story for our complaint. It was our government that did this to this woman.
A gruesome thought to end this thread. The woman whose story I highlighted above was sent to the Irwin detention center; the same place where at least 57 women have reported medical abuse, including unconsented hysterectomies.
The question from @RepJerryNadler to Nielsen asked about reducing CBP capacity "to process X number of people" per day, and @DHSOIG reveals that Nielsen not only knew that "X = 650," she personally signed off on those policies herself five months earlier.
- 283 children whose parents have not been found.
- 187 children whose parents have been found, but who have not been successfully contacted.
- 75 children whose parents have not been found, but telephonic outreach is expected to be successful.
The status report from today makes clear that this claim from Miles Taylor is completely wrong.
283 children remain whose parents, after “time-consuming and arduous on-the-ground searches,” cannot be found and for whom telephonic outreach is not expected be successful.
Setting aside that @MilesTaylorUSA misunderstood what today’s story was about, I want to talk about this a little more, though, because it reflects a narrative that people at DHS often used at the time reunification began—that many parents willingly gave up their kids.
NEW! The criminal bars to asylum proposed in December 2019 are finally here.
The rule will impose sweeping new asylum bans for people convicted of misdemeanor crimes as minor as using a fake ID—something millions of American college students do every day. public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2020-23159.pdf
The new criminal bars to asylum, which include not only minor misdemeanor crimes, but even situations where an immigration judge "has reason to believe" someone committed domestic violence—even if never arrested or convicted—will go into effect 30 days from tomorrow: November 20.
DHS/EOIR acknowledge that this new asylum bar—based an immigration judge having "reason to believe" an applicant has ever committed domestic battery—doesn't even require an arrest.
Immigration attorneys better prepare for mini trials, and start exercising subpoena authority.
Let's start with the facts he got wrong. Horowitz claims Pereida was convicted of "stealing the identity of a citizen" to get a job in Iowa.
Except he wasn't. The job was in Nebraska (despite biz having Iowa in name) and he was convicted of *attempted* "criminal impersonation."
Here's more of the sloppiness: Horowitz claims that "Even without stealing identity [sic], he came here illegally and should have no legal standing to remain in the country."
Except that's literally not how it works. For generations, Congress has created paths to avoid removal.
Wolf is making things up again. Here's what @DHSOIG said in 2005 about why Congress created ICE.
"ICE was established not with a focus on supporting a particular mission but rather on building an institutional foundation large enough to justify a new organization."
The entire OIG analysis from 2005 is amazing. Here's what OIG offered as one official's theory for why ICE was created in the first place—interior immigration enforcement alone would never "attain bureaucratic critical mass," so they threw a bunch of other things into the pot.
The 2005 OIG report is worth a read. It assessed whether CBP and ICE should be merged back into one immigration agency.
OIG said merger was "the optimal solution" with "almost universal" support among employees, most of whom used to work for INS. oig.dhs.gov/assets/Mgmt/OI…