Kirstjen Nielsen perjured herself. Here's the exchange from December 2018, when she was under oath:

@RepJerryNadler: Are you doing anything that would reduce your capacity to process X number of people per day at the ports?
Nielsen: No sir.

@DHSOIG today says that was a lie.
The question from @RepJerryNadler to Nielsen asked about reducing CBP capacity "to process X number of people" per day, and @DHSOIG reveals that Nielsen not only knew that "X = 650," she personally signed off on those policies herself five months earlier.

oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/… In May 2018, DHS and CBP leaders anticipated an increase in
Here is the full clip of Kirstjen Nielsen testifying under oath in December 2018 about metering at ports of entry.

I strongly encourage listening to this 90 second clip, then going back one tweet and reading what @DHSOIG found.

It seems clearly perjury.
c-span.org/video/?c491962…
For some reason @DHSOIG has taken down the copy of the report they posted earlier today. Here's a link in the meantime. adamisacson.com/files/OIG-21-0…
Here's another clip from the same hearing: c-span.org/video/?c491966…

@RepJerryNadler: "Are you engaged in any effort to increase processing capacity at ports?"

Nielsen: "Yes sir"

Again, the OIG report strongly suggests that was completely false.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aaron Reichlin-Melnick

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ReichlinMelnick

29 Oct
A comprehensive new @HouseJudiciary report on family separation puts to bed any suggestion that the Trump administration intended to reunite families.

One damning new revelation? Former CBP head Kevin McAleenan tried to keep separations going after a court ordered them to stop. While HHS and ICE attempted to comply with the executive ord
The @HouseJudiciary report also sheds more light on the fact that family separation was the goal of the Trump administration from Day One.

High-level administration officials met to begin planning separations within a month of Trump taking office, and floated plans to CNN. In mid-February 2017, just weeks after the presidential inau
Within six months of taking office, the Trump administration had begun a family separation "pilot project" in El Paso.

Despite separating 281 families during a four-month period, the Trump administration never disclosed the project to the agency in charge of childrens' shelters. In July 2017, CBP began an “initiative” (hereinafter the
Read 19 tweets
21 Oct
I read the status report. It’s:

- 283 children whose parents have not been found.
- 187 children whose parents have been found, but who have not been successfully contacted.
- 75 children whose parents have not been found, but telephonic outreach is expected to be successful.
The status report from today makes clear that this claim from Miles Taylor is completely wrong.

283 children remain whose parents, after “time-consuming and arduous on-the-ground searches,” cannot be found and for whom telephonic outreach is not expected be successful.
Setting aside that @MilesTaylorUSA misunderstood what today’s story was about, I want to talk about this a little more, though, because it reflects a narrative that people at DHS often used at the time reunification began—that many parents willingly gave up their kids.

Thoughts:
Read 12 tweets
20 Oct
NEW! The criminal bars to asylum proposed in December 2019 are finally here.

The rule will impose sweeping new asylum bans for people convicted of misdemeanor crimes as minor as using a fake ID—something millions of American college students do every day.
public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2020-23159.pdf
The new criminal bars to asylum, which include not only minor misdemeanor crimes, but even situations where an immigration judge "has reason to believe" someone committed domestic violence—even if never arrested or convicted—will go into effect 30 days from tomorrow: November 20.
DHS/EOIR acknowledge that this new asylum bar—based an immigration judge having "reason to believe" an applicant has ever committed domestic battery—doesn't even require an arrest.

Immigration attorneys better prepare for mini trials, and start exercising subpoena authority.
Read 6 tweets
19 Oct
It always amuses me how confidently @RMConservative talks about immigration law while displaying how little he actually knows about it.

This article is journalistic malpractice. It gets the facts wrong, the background wrong, the law wrong, and the legal questions wrong.
Let's start with the facts he got wrong. Horowitz claims Pereida was convicted of "stealing the identity of a citizen" to get a job in Iowa.

Except he wasn't. The job was in Nebraska (despite biz having Iowa in name) and he was convicted of *attempted* "criminal impersonation." Excerpt from Blaze article: "Mexican citizen Clemente PExcerpt from Eighth Circuit opinion: "Pereida pleaded n
Here's more of the sloppiness: Horowitz claims that "Even without stealing identity [sic], he came here illegally and should have no legal standing to remain in the country."

Except that's literally not how it works. For generations, Congress has created paths to avoid removal. Excerpt from Blaze piece: "Even without stealing identi
Read 5 tweets
10 Oct
! We just learned that after the Border Patrol “assisted” this woman, they took her to the hospital where her baby went into the NICU.

Then, hours after she gave birth, the Border Patrol threw her in a jail cell and are threatening to send her to Mexico without her baby—tonight!
Here’s more information about this developing situation.
We now have @mollymotoole’s story.

This woman had already been victimized by the Trump administration and sent back to Mexico under the Orwellian “Migrant Protection Protocols.”

Those have been indefinitely suspended since March. She was desperate. latimes.com/politics/story…
Read 4 tweets
24 Sep
Wolf is making things up again. Here's what @DHSOIG said in 2005 about why Congress created ICE.

"ICE was established not with a focus on supporting a particular mission but rather on building an institutional foundation large enough to justify a new organization." Image
The entire OIG analysis from 2005 is amazing. Here's what OIG offered as one official's theory for why ICE was created in the first place—interior immigration enforcement alone would never "attain bureaucratic critical mass," so they threw a bunch of other things into the pot. ImageImage
The 2005 OIG report is worth a read. It assessed whether CBP and ICE should be merged back into one immigration agency.

OIG said merger was "the optimal solution" with "almost universal" support among employees, most of whom used to work for INS. oig.dhs.gov/assets/Mgmt/OI… Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!