This Day in Labor History: October 29, 1889. Whites in Hawaii lynched the Japanese organizer and merchant Katsu Goto in Hawaii after opening a store to compete with the plantation company store and advocating for labor organizing! Let's talk about racism and labor in Hawaii!
This event would demonstrate how planters and other white migrants to Hawaii would use white supremacy and violence to establish control over the diverse labor force of those islands.
Nearly as soon as white missionaries arrived in Hawaii before the Civil War, they wrote back home about all the investment possibilities there.
Soon, whites arrived to establish sugar plantations, wresting control of the islands away from the native Hawaiians and putting increasing pressure on the Hawaiian government to capitulate to planters’ demands.
Sugar is a labor intensive crop and there was no way that Hawaiian natives could supply it, especially as disease was decimating that population. So the planters very quickly looked overseas. Japan was a major target.
At the same time, many Japanese were migrating to the United States for a better economic life. Many of them came to Hawaii. There, they were treated like dirt, much like agricultural laborers of color in the South.
Katsu Goto was one of the first laborers to come over. Born in 1862 in Kokufu-mura, Naka District, Kanagawa Prefecture, he worked for the government and learned English. In the early 1880s, the Japanese government worked out with the Hawaiian planters a migration plan.
The Kanyaku Imin were these people, 29,000 contract laborers sent by the Japanese government, a plan that lasted from 1885 until 1894. Goto, wanting a different life than what he had in his government, job, was on the first ship to arrive.
He was a laborer under a three-year contract on the Big Island. After those three years, Goto decided to open a store to serve the Japanese community in Honoka’a, the second largest city on the island. This made the white merchants serving the community angry.
Of course, he did a better job of getting the products they wanted; moreover, he treated them like humans. He soon became an advocate for the heavily exploited Japanese laborers. The planters and their overseers routinely whipped the Japanese workers. Goto was disgusted.
And because he spoke such good English, he also became the court representative for Japanese charged with crimes or for those trying to resist crimes against them by their employer. He also started to organize these workers to improve their working conditions.
When he started to organize workers, the planters struck back. Five men, including the overseer of one of the plantations, ambushed Goto after an organizer meeting. It was more than likely that plantation owner who ordered his death.
The next time anyone saw him, he was hanging from a telephone pole (or so it is reported today; I wonder if it wasn’t actually a telegraph pole, but whatever), strangled to death.
Somewhat surprising, the five men were charged. There was widespread outrage at such an outright awful murder, including in Japan. Two turned state’s witness and had their charges dropped. The other three were charged and found guilty of manslaughter.
Two escaped from prison, one to Australia and the other to California. Most likely, they had help from the planters to get out.
The third served his four year sentence and then was pardoned by the new governor in 1894, after the planters overthrew the Hawaiian governor, anticipating an annexation by the United States that would have to wait until after the anti-imperialist Grover Cleveland left power.
Yes, this is probably the only good thing one can say about Cleveland.
The Hawaiian planters would continue treating their workers like slaves for decades–Hawaiian, Chinese, Japanese, Portuguese, Filipino, and whoever else they could get in the fields.
Finally, in 1920, a cross-racial strike between the Japanese and Filipino workers would lead to a major victory for the field workers.
Back tomorrow to discuss how the legal system decided employers could maim and kill workers with no legal consequences.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Erik Loomis

Erik Loomis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ErikLoomis

30 Oct
This Day in Labor History: October 30, 1837. Nicholas Farwell, a train engineer toiling for the Boston and Worcester Rail Road Corporation fell off a train while at work and had his hand crushed. In 1842, the courts said he deserved no damages! Let's talk about this! Image
The 1842 decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Court set into place the doctrine of worker risk.
This decision set a vitally important precedent in American labor history that the worker voluntarily took on risk when he or she agreed to be employed on the job. Over the next century, tens thousands of Americans died on the job with employers doing nothing.
Read 26 tweets
30 Oct
I was very happy to be part of this @greenhousenyt article on the potential for a general strike if Trump tries to steal the election.

theguardian.com/us-news/2020/o…
As I said in the piece, if there ever is a general strike again, it's not out of some syndicalist fantasy. It will come straight from the established labor movement. And it very much can be effective. It may well be that only unions can save our democracy.
Moreover, if Trump or the courts steal this, there are going to be millions of pissed off people. But what's the organizational capability to organize these people into concrete action that's more than a one-off protest? It's pretty much only labor unions. It's sure not Democrats
Read 5 tweets
28 Oct
This Day in Labor History: October 28, 1793. Eli Whitney submitted a patent for his invention known as the cotton gin. Perhaps more than any technology in American history, this invention profoundly revolutionized American labor!!! Let's talk about it! Image
Creating the modern cotton industry meant the transition from agricultural to industrial labor in the North with the rise of the factory system and the rapid expansion and intensification of slavery in the South to produce the cotton.
The cotton gin went far to create the 19th century American economy and sharpened the divides between work and labor between regions of the United States, problems that would eventually lead to the Civil War.
Read 38 tweets
19 Oct
This Day in Labor History: October 19, 1935. John L. Lewis punches Carpenters president Big Bill Hutcheson in the face on the stage at the AFL Convention in Atlantic City. Let's talk about this bizarre moment and the creation of the CIO!
The United Brotherhood of Carpenters was the largest member of the AFL. It was also among the most politically conservative unions.
While, like much of the AFL, the UBC was technically nonpartisan in these years, Hutcheson was an active Republican and would remain so throughout his life, openly campaigning for Republican candidates against Franklin Roosevelt.
Read 28 tweets
18 Oct
This Day in Labor History: October 18, 1981. Workers at Brown and Sharpe, one of the nation’s largest machine tool companies, went on strike at its plant in North Kingstown, Rhode Island. This strike continued for...15 years! Let's talk about the longest strike in US history!
Brown and Sharpe was founded in 1833 a couple of miles from where I currently live in Providence, Rhode Island.
Over the decades, it became a large manufacturing firm making all sorts of goods in its large Rhode Island factories, helping to make the state one of the nation’s centers of American manufacturing.
Read 29 tweets
15 Oct
This Day in Labor History: October 15, 1914. President Wilson signs the Clayton Act, providing protections for unions from courts issuing injunctions against them. Yet this groundbreaking legislation would prove only moderately successful. Let's talk about why!
The Sherman Anti-Trust Act passed in 1890 and was intended to limit the monopolies that dominated the Gilded Age. But these laws required enforcement.
Not so different from today, when unions are subjected to First Amendment challenges and restrictions that no other institution in the United States have to deal with, the courts decided to find ways to use the Sherman Act to attack unions while ignoring it for corporations.
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!