My Resignation From The Intercept

The same trends of repression, censorship and ideological homogeneity plaguing the national press generally have engulfed the media outlet I co-founded, culminating in censorship of my own articles.

greenwald.substack.com/p/my-resignati…
"The final, precipitating cause is that The Intercept’s editors censored an article I wrote this week, refusing to publish it unless I remove all sections critical of Joe Biden, the candidate vehemently supported by all Intercept editors involved in this effort at suppression."
"But the pathologies, illiberalism, and repressive mentality that led to the bizarre spectacle of my being censored by my own media outlet are ones that are not unique to The Intercept."

I'll be doing my journalism at Substack for now. Subscribe here:

greenwald.substack.com/p/my-resignati…
I won't do a tit-for-tat with The Intercept. I get that need to defend themselves. But just note:

1) Ask Betsy Reed why they won't publish an accounting of what happened with Reality Winner & who that cover-up is protecting.

2) "Great journalism" that nobody reads isn't great.
3) Given their claims, I'm going to publish -- along with the censored article -- the emails about it so people can decide for themselves if it was censored.

4) I understand TI's editors will slam my journalism as "changed"; I wish they had had the courage to do it before today.
5) Like I said in my statement, The Intercept does still have some great journalists and publishes good things. I hope they can figure out how to induce some people to read it.

6) This is the CIA-mimicking paragraph I referenced that I was shocked to see at The Intercept:
Here's the article that I wrote about Joe Biden's conduct in Ukraine & China, based on Hunter's emails and other witness testimony, along with a critique of media lies designed to protect the Democratic candidate, which The Intercept refused to publish:

greenwald.substack.com/p/article-on-j…
Emails With Intercept Editors Showing Censorship of My Joe and Hunter Biden Article

There's no reason for anyone to have to decide who to believe. Feel free to see for yourselves what really happened:

greenwald.substack.com/p/emails-with-…
I should finally add here two things:

1) None of this conflict has anything to do with @TheInterceptBr, whose journalism I continue to have the highest regard for and hope it remains supported

2) @jeremyscahill is in the same position as I: not part of these decisions at all.
Anyone trying to reach me: my previous email has been terminated.

You can use GlennGreenwald@gmail.com
I’ll be on Fox at the top of the 8pm ET hour to talk about the events of today, my departure from the Intercept, the article about the Bidens that was censored, and what it reflects about broader media culture and the election.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

27 Oct
Social media popularity and viral clout is such a powerful drug — it’s literally a drug: it’s constructed that way — that some people will say and do absolutely anything to obtain the next hit.

I mean just look at this. What else could drive someone to do something like this???
Navarro evidently ultimately said she was voting for Clinton but she used the airwaves to legitimize frivolous write-in votes for saying on CNN that she would vote for her mom:
This is what @ananavarro was saying one month before the 2016 election. Now she’s acting like those who followed her advice are the root of all evil:
Read 4 tweets
25 Oct
This is Vladimir Herzog, a Jewish immigrant to Brazil who fled anti-Semitism in Croatia during WW2 & became a prominent journalist. 45 years ago today, he was murdered by the US/UK-supported military regime, which then released a fabricated photo to claim he committed suicide. 
The military regime that murdered Herzog came to power when CIA worked with right-wing Brazilian generals to overthrow the democratically elected President in 1964. They ruled for 21 years, torturing & killing many dissidents, including Herzog. @dilmabr was one of those tortured.
It was Herzog’s rabbi who bravely blew the whistle by quickly obtaining his body & revealing that he had been tortured to death during interrogation. That was a key spark that led Brazilians to rise up against the US/UK-supported dictatorship & force re-democratization in 1985.
Read 5 tweets
25 Oct
One of the clearest and most important sentences you'll read, showing how US media really works, from WashPost op-ed by @RidT:

** "We must treat the Hunter Biden leaks as if they were a foreign intelligence operation — even if they probably aren't." **

washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/1…
This is absolutely how mainstream US outlets think: exactly what is said there by Rid (one of those centrist Professor outlets use to elevate their unhinged conspiracy theories with a facade of expertise):

*We have no idea if this conspiracy is true, but we will say it anyway.* Image
There is no question -- none -- that mainstream US news outlets disseminate more unhinged, unproven conspiracy theories -- and do far more damage with them -- than QAnon, or whichever fringe group they want you to focus on, can achieve in 1,000 years.

See for yourself: ImageImageImageImage
Read 8 tweets
23 Oct
Even with Trump gone, Dems and their media outlets are going to keep centering/inflating the threat of Fascism and Right-Wing Domestic Terrorism because that's what keeps everyone in line behind the Dems: we can't fight neoliberalism or imperialism until we've vanquished fascism!
The Democratic Party and its media outlets - MSNBC, CNN, WPost/NYT - are drowning in cash. The key is to keep fear levels high: they keep everyone scared about a fascist takeover & present themselves as the only protectors. It's a model of profit and power that is not going away.
Huge swaths of US liberalism & even the left got convinced over 4 years that institutions like CIA, FBI, NSA, etc. - and neocons/right-wing operatives like David Frum, Bill Kristol, Rick Wilson - might not be perfect but they at least oppose fascism & care about democracy (lol).
Read 5 tweets
22 Oct
Julian Assange has been imprisoned in the UK for 1 1/2 years because US Govt wants to prosecute him for publishing docs exposing war crimes. Convicted of nothing, he has no chance of freedom any time soon: even if he wins, US Govt will appeal & he'll remain imprisoned for years. Image
The attempted extradition of Assange -- pushed by Pompeo & Jeff Sessions -- is the greatest threat to US press freedoms in years. His -- and Snowden's -- only chance for freedom is a Trump pardon. People forget how repressive & malicious Dems are with whistleblowers. Watch, 2014:
In 2013, even the Obama DOJ -- which prosecuted more whistleblowers for espionage than all previous administrations *combined* -- concluded Assange couldn't be prosecuted without destroying press freedom. But Pompeo & Sessions don't care about that.

washingtonpost.com/world/national…
Read 5 tweets
22 Oct
What happened in Brazil last year - with anonymous Bolsonaristas publishing obviously forged chats & documents in my name and other journalists and members of Congress - illustrates the point. Brazilian news outlets didn't ignore them: they debunked them.

noticias.uol.com.br/politica/ultim…
When those forged emails & docs were published by Bolsonaro's goons about us, reporters asked us and we all said what any person in that situation would say: these chats are fake. That enabled journalists to debunk them. Why don't the Bidens say this?

noticias.uol.com.br/politica/ultim…
But again: journalists don't have real doubts about the authenticity of these Hunter docs. That's the pretext, not the reason, for refusing to discuss them (do you believe the same media which spent 4 years on the Steele Dossier & Russiagate have rigorous verification standards?)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!