1. A short thread on the U.S.-India 2+2 Ministerial Dialogue, Secretary Pompeo's trip to South Asia, and the emergency of a China-focused South Asia policy in his own words.
2. Washington has long viewed South Asia as a hedge against a perceived threat--first the USSR & later al-Qaeda. Pompeo is revamping the US posture in South Asia with a new cast of characters but the same failed reactionary & threat-based approach. This time the focus is China.
3. When @ThePrintIndia's @ShekharGupta asked about the significance of US-India ties apart from China, Pompeo oddly fantasized about a world where a nation of 1.4 billion people recedes into the shadows.
4. Speaking yesterday in the Maldives, Pompeo trashed multilateralism and blamed global warming on China--a phenomenon his administration denies even exists. No solutions. No leadership. Only finger pointing.
5. In Sri Lanka, Pompeo claimed the choice is clear: the US offers free enterprise & China which he calls a "predator" offers exploitative loans. But the prevailing view on the ground in the region is China is the only show in town. Ambassador @dinopattidjalal (Indonesia) argues:
6. Sri Lanka’s President Gotabaya Rajapaksa made it clear that his country isn’t picking sides:
7. And there are other motivations not to pick sides besides the obvious benefits of non-alignment as described in this @NikkeiAsia report. It is almost as if the cost-benefit analysis nations conduct is more complex than Pompeo's talking points:
8. In India, Pompeo delivered empty “with us or against us” remarks that divide the world between authoritarianism and freedom loving nations--inconvenient US “partners” aside.
9. Empty civilizational rhetoric about the shared destiny of two increasingly illiberal democracies is great for opening remarks but it doesn’t equate to a coherent policy toward South Asia -- a region of over one billion people.
10. So what did Pompeo’s trip to South Asia accomplish? It restated obvious realities that exist regardless of the US, rattled Pakistan at a time when cooperation is crucial, & alienated partners by asking them to unilaterally sacrifice for the sake of Washington's China policy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam N Weinstein

Adam N Weinstein Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamNoahWho

19 Jul
1. The backlash against Dr. Moeed Yusuf offers a case study of the obstacles that Pakistan will face as it attempts to professionalize its bureaucracy. The allegations that Yusuf is unduly influenced by Washington is a projection of Pakistan's own nepotism and sycophancy.
2. The assumption that Yusuf's success in Washington is entangled by a quid pro quo understanding only makes sense if you have existed as a big fish in the small pond of Pakistan's policy world. DC suffers from nepotism too, but merit still plays a role.
3. Instead of asking what a green card holder who returns to Pakistan is beholden to, one might consider what allows the traditional elites of the country to feel secure without other options in a country where ambitious young people see few avenues for upward mobility?
Read 7 tweets
27 Jul 18
1. The condescension & lack of depth of US coverage of #ElectionsPakistan2018 w/ clickbait headlines & Tom Friedmanesque "playboy turned extremist" ledes is unfortunate. The issue isn't criticism of IK but the shallowness of the examination of #Pakistan. We can do better.
2. The WaPo Editorial Board's "#Pakistan’s likely next leader is a Taliban sympathizer" raises some valid concerns about Imran Khan's record. But it glosses over the PMLN's own past & at times verges on an outright defense of Sharif. It then cherrypicks IK's platform.
3. NYT's social media team couldn't resist the juxtaposition of sex symbol, Islamic Republic, & nukes. The writers opened w/ "Is Imran Khan, a legendary cricket player and international sex symbol, about to become the leader of #Pakistan, an Islamic republic with nuclear weapons?
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!