While Frederick Douglass is being recognized more and more nowadays, and his powerful anti-racist arguments are increasingly popular, I think there's another part of his legacy that is overlooked.
This is random, but here's a short thread on Douglass and religious liberty. /1
It's sometimes overlooked that Douglass's first job, after escaping slavery, was as a preacher, and many of his literacy lessons came from reading the bible. This, of course, makes sense given his frequent biblical allusions, the number of which always astound my students. /2
Yet a trenchant theme found throughout his abolitionist career was his critique of present religious institutions that supported slavery and, simultaneously, his firm belief in religiosity's importance within the nation. /3
On my most recent reading through his orations & essays, I've been struck by how frequently he brings up the topic of "religious liberty." This is a potent phrase with a long history, of course, but I thought Douglass offered a compelling argument still relevant today. /4
For example, in 1852, he declared that the Fugitive Slave Law, which forced citizens to support the efforts to find and return those who had escaped slavery, was the most flagrant infringement of religious liberty, as it infringed on one's moral compass. /5
“That the Church...does not esteem [it] as a declaration of war against religious liberty, implies [the] Church regards religion simply as a form of worship, an empty ceremony, & not a vital principle, requiring active benevolence, justice, love & good will toward man.” /6
In other words, fraudulent and oppressive federal practices forced infidelity upon all believers residing in the nation, as it made them support policies that betrayed their principles. Douglass claimed the Fugitive Slave Law did more to destroy Christianity than Thomas Paine. /7
This is, I think, a brilliant and needed meditation on what we mean by "religious liberty." Too often, Douglass claims, we equate the phrase with ecclesiastical practices and societal structures that, while important, are actually not the root of religiosity. /8
Instead, we should consider how the oppression of marginalized groups, perpetuated by government/society/communities and validated by complicit/silent churches, is also an indictment of religious convictions, and even a betrayal of our religious liberty to save humanity. /9
This idea hit me especially hard in our present context, where some are decrying health & safety policies designed to save people as attacks on one's freedom to gather & worship. Or, more broadly, claims that protections for privileged classes an erosion of religious liberty. /10
The term "religious liberty" has been colonized by a particular segment of society to defend a partisan collection of ideas. This is the culmination, of course, of the coalition formed between evangelicals and the GOP, as the phrase now reflects conservative priorities. /11
But learning from Douglass, there's power in reclaiming the powerful phrase. Racial oppression, gender discrimination, economic inequality, the literal placement of children in cages--all of these are infringements on religious liberty, our right to create a moral nation. /12
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There’s been a lot said about whether BH Roberts lost faith in the Book of Mormon. I think much of the debate is misplaced: what he was argued was not belief/unbelief, but the *nature* of belief. And the debate said a lot about modern Mormonism.
BH Roberts (1857-1933) did more than nearly anyone else to synthesize and codify Mormon thought during the faith’s transition period. As Sterling McMurrin once put it, he was neither a great historian or theologian, but he was the best historian & theologian Mormonism had. /2
Many of his documentary histories, monographs, and treaties became standard readings for the saints, and some of them remain so today. It’s a reach that very few can match.
But to his chagrin, two of his late works did not receive as much attention as he’d like. /3
Okay, so you've watched the #HamiltonFilm, and want to celebrate #FourthofJuly by digging deeper into America's founding. Here are some recommendations for books that not only cover key themes and topics from the play, but are also very engaging and approachable. /1
First, there's an excellent collection of essays by historians on the play itself, including its many meanings and misreadings, edited by @TenuredRadical. I especially like @jlpasley's essay on the modern uses of federalists like Hamilton. /2 rutgersuniversitypress.org/historians_on_…
For the American Revolution in general, there are legions of books that provide solid overviews. My favorite is Alan Taylor's, which balances military, indigenous, political, and social sides of the era. It is a comprehensive continental history. /3 wwnorton.com/books/American…
Hey y'all: today's the 176th anniversary of Joseph Smith's death at Carthage Jail. It's a pretty important date for members of the LDS Church, but allow me to argue, drawing from my #KingdomOfNauvoo book, why it's also an important part of America's history of democracy. /1
By 1844, the Mormons had been settled in Nauvoo, Illinois, their own city-state on the Illinois banks of the Mississippi River, for five years. The city housed around 12,000 citizens, with thousands more in outlying communities. It was larger than even Chicago. /2
For Joseph Smith and his followers, Nauvoo was an outpost from a fallen world, the final refuge in a society that had become too wicked and anarchic. They had already been forcibly removed from New York, Ohio, and Missouri. They felt democracy failed them. /3
The pictures of all the protests across the nation have lifted me, but this one one with the "Mormons Against Racism" sign gave me a tear. It's from Atlanta--courtesy @alleycatrn--and it struck me because of something I encountered in my #MormonAmerica research. A quick thread./1
As I mentioned in another thread, 1968 was a crossroads for both Mormonism and America when it came to race, as protests erupted across the nation. LDS Church leaders featured those both sympathetic and angered by the civil rights movement. /2
In July of that year, the First Presidency received a letter from William Nichols, who presided over the LDS stake in Atlanta. Nichols was requesting permission to take part in a multi-religious protest in favor of civil rights in the city. /3
It's been heartbreaking to see so much pain and anguish this weekend, and tragic that a principle as simple as #blacklivesmatter is still so contested.
As a historian, I immediately thought of precedents, so I thought I'd share some lessons from my #MormonAmerica research. /1
Many have shown connections to the 1968 racial riots that similarly enflamed the nation, also in an election year. (Though @TomSugrue has also pointed out key differences.) It just so happens that I'm currently working on Mormonism in 1960s, with eye to racial views. /2
Perhaps what has been so startling is how many different Mormon perspectives there were in 1968, including on the divisive topic of race. There was no clear trajectory or determined position, but a culture in transition. I'll highlight some examples, & relevance for today. /3
First, context: 1950s America was filled with a Christian nationalism that flooded popular culture and the political sphere. This is when "One Nation Under God" became the national motto, "under God" was added to the Pledge, etc. /1
This was also the period that Mormonism most successfully assimilated into American culture, as leaders enthusiastically participated in this "Christian Libertarian" movement in deep and public ways. In return, the "pioneer" image was embraced as icon of the American will. /2
Much of this rhetoric was in direct response to the Cold War, as America is highlighted as the "godly" nation in response to the "godless" commies. World politics became an arena for religious battle, and it dominated domestic and denominational spheres. /3