Ranked choice voting is an amazing electoral innovation that lets you mark one of the two major party candidates as your “first choice” instead of voting for them outright.
I was a fan of ranked choice until I tried to explain to a skeptical voter why "some people get to vote multiple times while others just get one vote" and realized that ranked choice adds both cognitive complexity and ballot complexity to an already difficult process
From ranked choice voting to end-to-end encryption and wood apples, I tend to like stuff a lot until I try it and realize it is way overhyped
What we really need in California is to combine ranked-choice voting with ballot initiatives! Vote for your top 5 preferred bond issues or constitutional exemptions for companies employing gig workers, ranked in descending order of preference.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A thread on how record fundraising has crippled a bunch of Democratic campaigns, which also ties in to people's question "can candidates do anything useful with donations a week before the election?" TL;DR no one can afford to pay for pre-reserved ad time because of Senate races
If you're running for Congress, you book a bunch of ad time right before the election, based on your anticipated budget. In most cases you can't pay up front for this ad time even if you wanted to.
There's a law that says candidates have to be charged the lowest rate available for ads they run within 60 days of the election. In the past, that has made ad costs fairly predictable in smaller media markets. It also means candidates get a better deal than Super PACs
A thread expressing some concerns I have, too. I think a lot of the articles about the genius of Biden's low-key approach to campaigning are being too clever by half, and the vital lessons of Brexit and 2016 (things can move quickly in the last week) have not been absorbed
In particular, the arrogance of relying on election models in a year when we are entirely outside the parameters of those models gives me a feeling of dread. I am encouraged that Biden plans to leave the house this week and visit places we badly need to win
The country has become so politically segregated that it's hard for most voters to get a good read on how a national election is going. It's not like you have neighbors in the other party you can talk to. The polling is a lot like financial models—it works great until it doesn't
It's a week before the election! A thread on where your money is still useful: First off, two House races in rural Maine and northwest Iowa with a record of overperforming in rural votes, both in states where we need every vote we can get to win the Senate secure.actblue.com/donate/great_s…
Second, state races in North Carolina! Not only are we in a position to win the state house there, but it's a swing state with a crucial Senate contest, and it's full of registered Democrats who don't vote. Help state candidates reach
them this year! secure.actblue.com/donate/state_s…
Third, state races in Florida. This is a must-win state for Trump, and another opportunity to win a state house, which would mean Medicaid expansion and fair redistricting in 2021. State candidates there have been badly outraised by Republicans, help them! secure.actblue.com/donate/state_s…
A nice thing about agricultural areas of Nebraska and Iowa is that the grocery stores have the usual timid "ethnic foods" aisle with ramen noodles and the like, but also a separate and well-stocked "EXTREMELY MEXICAN" section, both in the produce and dry goods departments
Like if you need to find the rare dried pepper that only grows at the bottom of cenotes in the Yucatán, you will find it in the migrant worker section of a Nebraska Hy-Vee
Err, I said migrant worker but these days it is mostly about people coming to work long-term in places like the meatpacking plants
This line of attack is interesting to unpack: it's ultimately based on a misguided decision by @OpenSecretsDC to lump political giving by employees in with political giving by corporate PACs, which makes about as much sense as comparing what autoworkers give to with what GM wants
Diane Mitsch Bush (a candidate I fundraise for) takes no corporate donations at all, but @OpenSecretsDC does not distinguish between what employees give as individuals and what their employer gives as a PAC, even when (like in the case of Google) the two are polar opposites
The whole thing is made funnier by the fact that Boebert does accept corporate PAC money, like this $5,000 donation from the American Crystal Sugar company, which for its own reasons has decided to support a Qanon-adjacent gun nut with a criminal record for Congress in Colorado