Good morning! It's Friday, last night the US reported +33.1% QoQ SaaR growth from -31.4%. As we know this number is useless in the fact that Q2 & Q3 were unique in their seasonal sense & can't be extrapolated/annualized to think that Q3 will persist.
So? %YoY GDP rose -2.9%YoY
Taking into account the -9%YoY of Q2 & +0.3% of Q1 then we have an average three quarters growth of -3.9%YoY.
In other words, Q4 will determine whether the US will contract by only a small single digit or as consensus forecast of -4%.
Jobless claims are falling a bit (talking about stock of continuing claims & existing home sales pretty strong on a %YoY). That said, the question is how needy the economy of more stimulus (2nd fiscal package not passed) & whether states will suppress activities & dampen growth.
Of course the big move last night is EUR/USD & that's because of lock-down 2.0 in Europe as EUR can't handle the heat of rising virus count & further suppression, which well, is a huge downer on all levels.
Lagarde flagged for some December easing w/ her "recalibrate instruments
Asia'll recover better than Europe &asset prices are showing that. Looking at spot FX vs USD. Winners??? ASIANS, even IDR or shall I say especially IDR because I think Indonesia will recover from the abyss thanks to its reforms & walking back on mistakes.
Let me rephrase this: I think not just Asia will recover faster than Europe but also the US. So far data shows that & there's no reason to believe that US Q4 < Europe Q4 w/ their higher virus count + more extreme suppression.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2016, Arie Kapteyn (Dutch Economist for USC) & Robert Cahaly (Republican pollster for Trafalgar Group) saw Trump coming while others didn't as they predicted Trump getting Penn, Michigan, FLorida & NC & he won all.
Let's talk about how they think current polls underestimate.
3 factors they discuss that u should know: 1) Existing polls that use PHONE is outdate b/c who has time to answer 23 mins of phone conversation & tell someone what they really think if they're a Trump supported & so people answer are EXTREME or BORED. Short & anonymous is better.
Are polls biased? Here is the map from Fivethirtyeight that thought Hillary chance of winning was 66.9% in 2016 & I circled the states where the polls were wrong & that's 46 electoral votes that decided the 2016 election.
According to polls, here is what the electoral map looks like:
*Biden solid 259 so he needs to flip 11 to win so polls showing his hurdle to win much lower than Trump
*Obvs polls don't vote, people do so we'll find out if pollsters are doing a good job
*Trump has only solid 125
So for Trump, it's clear he needs to take ALL THE TOSS-UP esp Texas, Florida, Georgia & North Carolina.
He still needs to paint that map pretty red w/ Ohio & Pennsylvania being key (polls moving towards his direction).
Still, he needs to take either Arizona or the lake ones.
Here I assume he takes Arizona but it could be Michigan although polls aren't in his favor for Michigan.
Either way, I am very very excited in the coming days for polls/voting patterns.
May be a "sure" thing & hurdle is perceived to be "lower" for Biden, all based on polls.
Asia recovery > Europe for the simple reason that here in Asia we are done w/ lock-downs (that was my call & I think a correct one). Look at India, Indonesia & the Philippines when they had high cases & suppression measures weren't intense because they simply cannot afford it.
India had a lock-down from 25 March to end of May & that resulted in a -24%YoY contraction of GDP.
Okay, but then what happened when it started easing? Cases SPIKED & deaths but it didn't continue w/ the lock-down b/c just simply barely afforded the 1st.
So? It lived w/ it.
So what happened to Covid-19 cases & deaths? Well, it rose in Q3 but then declined sharply in Q4.
And India achieved this without a lock-down. Meaning, the 1st lock-down kept cases down but delayed the spread anyway to Q3 & so w/o one, cases still fell.
Firms move to Vietnam as a China labor cost arbitrage trade. Tariffs + another cost to the equation. Trump doesn’t care about textile moving from China to VN. He wanted access for American services (financials) & limit China rise in tech & vertical integration of value chain.
People write these stories all the time about how firms shifting to Vietnam is a failure of Trump policy. US wages are expensive. No way it’s competitive in labor intensive manufacturing. Americans in trade negotiations want champions to thrive & that’s high tech & services
I met Obama negotiators for TPP & basically US admin people. Same idea. TPP is all about market access as for the Americans they don’t want Asian style FTAs (tariff reduction only & non tariff barriers up) but US style & that means investment & that means US banks/services etc.
Ready? Here we go: a comparison of the USA, Europe & the UK. New cases per millions. Look at that. Europe went from doing so well in the summer to massive explosion of cases.
US cases remained steady in comparison, still high. US suppression also not as severe & state dependent
How did Europe get here? Very simple, it had a pretty relaxing summer & judging from my friends going about holidaying w/o masks in groups basking in that beautiful Mediterrean sea while Americans bicker over masks etc, I knew, I knew this was coming & it's gonnna be explosive.
Btw, Europe had a much more severe lock-down that the US in Q2 2020. So that had social & economic costs while still plenty of lives lost anyway.
After the severe lock-down, it had a summer that was nice, sunny days, normalization etc.