Cognition is all about the regulation of selves and their intrinsic motivators.
Motivators are indexical signs that are significant for the regulation of a self-model.
A self-model does not remain static, but is in constant negotiation with its many motivators.
A self-model generates from the past the behaviors in its present to coordinate with its future.
But what motivators drive every single human in the planet?
It is the motivation that their future self can be shared with others.
We are a very long way from AGI. In green are current capabilities.
It'll never be complete unless it gets connected with the capabilities defined by living things.
Where do intrinsic motivators come from?
If we look at dogs as an example. Dogs are bred over multiple generations to have a specific trait. I have a Corgi, and she is motivated to herd balls and herd people as well!
This is likey true of humans also. Societies select for humans with a specific kind of motivation. This motivation reveals itself in terms of behavior that is selected for.
Motivations reveal themselves in personalities. If we think of a person's behavior as being driven by their past experiences. Past experiences being accumulated due to a person's personality. It is no surprise some people are more skilled than others.
It's a consequence of their motivations. Humans have taken over this world because we are inclined towards cooperative behavior.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Carlos E. Perez

Carlos E. Perez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IntuitMachine

1 Nov
Netflix's Queen's Gambit must be the ultimate mathematical nerd series. One cannot underestimate the detail of this movie and how it takes you back to a different time.
The movie takes place in the decade of the 1960s. Where a young child mother dies and is sent to an orphanage. What's incredible is how this movie reveals the changes in 60s, the technology, architecture, interior decoration, music and fashion style.
But that's just a slice of the movie, it's about a gifted chess player. Few may have noticed that her natural mother wrote a Ph.D. thesis in group theory. This reveals her unique innate ability.
Read 13 tweets
29 Oct
Self is the process of identity.
Revised to capture Varela's self-referentiality->closure->autopoiesis->autonomy
Self leads to modularity. The Self with Others leads to conflict. Empathy leads to a resolution between the Self and Others.
Read 14 tweets
28 Oct
We use the word causality as a means of understanding cognition but we don't really understand its distinctions. Let's look at what C.S.Peirce had to say about causality.
What @yudapearl says is that to understand a system one needs to hypothesize a model of the system and then see how this model is in agreement. Statistics is just one of the methods of testing. But it's not how one formulates the original model.
Peirce called this cognitive capability to hypothesize about the world as Abduction. Bayes rule is in fact a kind of abduction. When Bayesians talk about formulating priors, they are actually implicitly talking about an impoverished form of abduction.
Read 16 tweets
26 Oct
(1) All technologies are combinations. Individual technologies are combined from components. (2) Each component of technology is itself in miniature technology. (3) All technologies harness and exploit some natural effect or phenomenon.
This is Brian Arthur's definition of technology in amazon.com/Nature-Technol…
His framework is general enough so that we can recognize things that we don't conventionally consider as technology. These include culture, human organizations, processes, language and biology.
Read 29 tweets
25 Oct
John Krakauer in a recent Learning Salon conversation focused on the huge gap between participatory learning and propositional learning. It occurred to me that propositional learning is a kind of hypnosis!
Coincidentally, today's currents events are a consequence of hypnosis. @scottadamssays was the first to notice Trump's apparent use of hypnosis methods. fortune.com/2020/09/27/don…
Hypnosis can be scientifically described as 'believed-in imagination'. asch.net/portals/0/jour…
Read 9 tweets
24 Oct
Both evolution and the brain are massively parallel discovery processes. But what is the difference between the two?
As a model to understand evolution, let's take the super organism known as bacteria and its adversarial viruses. This process involves horizontal gene transfer and endosymbiosis. Often overlooked by many models of evolution that confine themselves only to mutation.
In an abstract sense, the 3 mechanisms of evolution to drive innovation involves: chance (i.e. mutation), local information propagation (i.e. HGT), information reuse (i.e. Endosymbiosis). What are the equivalences for this in brains?
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!