Leo Varadkar's statement effectively confirms the core factual allegation of @VillageMagIRE story - that he sent the document to the President of the NAGP.
Behind bluster about defamatory is an assertion that there was nothing wrong about it because info was in public domain.
But the document was not in the public domain. A press release about it was in the public domain. That's a very different thing.
Consider the messages between inner sanctum of NAGP. If they thought it was in the public domain, why did they refer to it as "very confidential"?
His suggestion that he can't be in breach of Section 7 the Corruption Offences Act 2018 because he didn't receive any benefit is inaccurate.
It expressly provides that it's an offence if you use confidential information for the advantage of "any other person."
Does the Taoiseach accept Varadkar's explanation? Does Eamon Ryan?
Will time be set aside in the Dail on Tuesday for questions and answers about this?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Given that @VillageMagIRE magazine is now online, a summary of the central allegation and the law and codes of conduct that Leo Varadkar is alleged to have broken. #LeoTheLeak
Varadkar is accused of leaking the GP contract that was being negotiated between govt and IMO.
Allegedly, he sent it to the President of the National Association of GPs (a rival organisation to the IMO) on 2 April, before it being finally concluded and published.
This would have given the NAGP a potential advantage relative to the IMO.
They could have used information contained in that confidential document to undermine the agreement before it was concluded and to undermine the IMO for their own benefit.
If this is accurate, and we haven't heard from Leo Varadkar yet, it would seem to be a breach of the law.