Leo Varadkar's statement effectively confirms the core factual allegation of @VillageMagIRE story - that he sent the document to the President of the NAGP.

Behind bluster about defamatory is an assertion that there was nothing wrong about it because info was in public domain.
But the document was not in the public domain. A press release about it was in the public domain. That's a very different thing.

Consider the messages between inner sanctum of NAGP. If they thought it was in the public domain, why did they refer to it as "very confidential"?
His suggestion that he can't be in breach of Section 7 the Corruption Offences Act 2018 because he didn't receive any benefit is inaccurate.

It expressly provides that it's an offence if you use confidential information for the advantage of "any other person."
Does the Taoiseach accept Varadkar's explanation? Does Eamon Ryan?

Will time be set aside in the Dail on Tuesday for questions and answers about this?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Murphy

Paul Murphy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @paulmurphy_TD

31 Oct
Given that @VillageMagIRE magazine is now online, a summary of the central allegation and the law and codes of conduct that Leo Varadkar is alleged to have broken. #LeoTheLeak

Varadkar is accused of leaking the GP contract that was being negotiated between govt and IMO.
Allegedly, he sent it to the President of the National Association of GPs (a rival organisation to the IMO) on 2 April, before it being finally concluded and published.

This would have given the NAGP a potential advantage relative to the IMO.
They could have used information contained in that confidential document to undermine the agreement before it was concluded and to undermine the IMO for their own benefit.

If this is accurate, and we haven't heard from Leo Varadkar yet, it would seem to be a breach of the law.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!