Boris Johnson has just talked about a massive expansion of rapid result home testing kits which seem to be the saliva tests made by Innova. theguardian.com/world/2020/oct…
The evidence supporting this test is really weak. The Government study reported here has meaningfully no detail at all. gov.uk/government/pub…
You can see the CE Marking for the Innova Test here. A few comments on it follow. 1drv.ms/b/s!AgDubbkGwE…
First point.
It's not a home test. It is "intended for use by trained clinical laboratory personnel specifically instructed and trained in the techniques of in vitro diagnostic procedures."
Second point.
It is not for use for people without symptoms.
Third point.
It is only designed for use "within the first five days of the onset of symptoms."
A leading academic in the field has told me: "If a company was marketing the test with these statements the MHRA would act to stop them as it is putting the population at risk. It is truly dreadful that the Government is proposing this."
We had spent approximately £130m as of 2 October on tests that are going to be used for a purpose otherwise than that for which they were designed and which will be administered by people not trained to administer them.
I can't help but feel that the exercise might help the Prime Minister's standing in the polls but it's hard to see how it helps public health.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@GoodLawProject is bringing some litigation to protect the rights and dignities of trans people; we've hired the legal team and sent the formal letter before action and we're just waiting for the right time to launch.
Anyway, we recorded an interview I did with a trans woman in her late fifties. She talks about how as a child - she was brought up Catholic - she would say her prayers at night that she might wake up fully as a girl. She's in tears, I'm in tears. It's totally heartbreaking.
She goes on to talk about what her relatively late transition has meant for her sense of self and how immeasurably better her life would have been had she been able to transition earlier.
One of the many extraordinary things about the world the Government is creating is the institutionalisation of political patronage. Lucrative public contracts - and jobs too - for their mates.
There is also Dido Harding who was appointed as Head of the National Institute for Health Protection. She is the wife of a Conservative MP and friend of former Prime Minister David Cameron.
Embedded in this decision is an assertion that the question 'should one discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, or sexual preference, or gender identity?' is one that requires balance, one on which reasonable people can disagree. theguardian.com/media/2020/oct…
Decisions like this - which implicitly legitimise racism or homophobia or transphobia - are one reason why I hope the Labour Party finds its focus, and quickly. The country is changing before our eyes, and not for the better.
Personal take. The BBC (in common with much of our media, including, shamefully, the Guardian) has a number of transphobes in its editorial structure. The efforts of those transphobes to institutionalise their prejudice is landing the BBC in all sorts of legal hot water.
In October last year, after I won the Prorogation case and whilst I was litigating the Benn Act case, a dormant company which had carried out building works for me three years previously sued me for some £500,000.
The dormant company, EA Chiverton Limited, repeatedly refused to say who is funding the (considerable) costs of that litigation. Today, after releasing details of the Government's procurement practices, I received an enquiry from the Daily Mail about the litigation.
I don't know whether the litigation is politically motivated but the Claimant's conduct of the litigation, and the timing of this enquiry, are difficult to understand. The Daily Mail tells me "there is nothing odd about it."
We need to talk about isolation suits - also known as "coveralls". THREAD
Experimental data shows that during the pandemic we have used 533,000 coveralls using the emergency procurement procedure that bypasses all normal governance controls. But how many have we purchased? gov.uk/government/pub…
Well, it's rather difficult to tell. If you add together the eleven biggest contracts for coveralls - and I'll return to these below - you can see we've spent a total of £708m on them. But Government has done a very careful job of redacting the per unit price.
Way back in April 2017, we announced we were going to take on HMRC's failure to assess Uber to VAT "tens or hundreds of millions of pounds every year" which corroded public trust in HMRC and the establishment generally. crowdjustice.com/case/uber/
It's been quite a scrap.
There have been lows - like us spending all the money we raised in the crowdfunder trying to get a protective costs order - and failing. bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/…