. @GATEOrg are looking for a consultant to write a hit piece on UK feminists who are concerned about the replacement of sex by gender in law and policy and the transing of children...
Gate have noticed (as we have been saying for ages) that the movement of people concerned about gender ideology in the UK are not in the main right wing or religious but feminist and LGB lead.

These are people who founded and supported Stonewall and marched against section 28.
This does not fit with the story that the LGBT orgs and their funders have been telling themself: that the only people who object to the replacement of sex by 'gender identity' are conservative political and religious groups

globalphilanthropyproject.org

@GPP_Updates
So now Gate want a consultant to map the UK gender critical scene

...and "identify key entry points for international solidarity"
They'd like someone with excellent research skills
But also sex workers are encouraged to apply 🙄

(if sex work is work why would this make sense?)

Also indigenous people... Celts, Picts, Angles amongst you get your applications in
Who are Gate? They are an organisation based in New York lead by Mauro Cabral - one of the lead authors of the Yogyakarta Principles and the YP + 10
They've got nearly a £3/4m budget (thats only about 1/10 of Stonewall - not a huge org, but well funded for 7 staff )
And a drop in the ocean of $200 m of foundation funding for LGBTQ issues

(which in itself is a relative drop in the ocean of global philanthropy - Gates Foundation spends $5bn, Open Society Foundation $1.2Bn)
They are funded by @ArcusLGBT and @OpenSociety and others.

More broadly they are influential of the funders that fund stuff in this area they include many w wider goals of democracy & inclusion like OSF @hivos @SRausingTrust @GlobalFundWomen @Baring_Found & @FordFoundation
Given the way the TORs are framed I strongly suspect the final report will score big on GenderWang (HT @jebrux for the cards)

Along the lines of "why are there so many TERFs in the UK"

nytimes.com/2019/02/07/opi…

....which is a real shame.....
Because these funders really should engage their brains on what is going on in the UK and ask themselves the @jackappleby question
Because the elitist authoritarian top-down imposition of the idea that sex doesn't matter, and the accompanying clamp down on freedom of speech and belief, and against grassroots civil society organising is the exact opposite of what they say they stand for.

@OpenSociety
Read what happened to @abigailshrier

The organisations that are against authoritarianism find themselves on the same side as those trying to shut down her compassionate carefully argued book about dangers to vulnerable children and teenagers

The UK's established, funded voluntary sector is cowering already.

In every org there are women and men who think that the move to erase sex and replace it with gender identity is scary, scary stuff.

Who are scared to like the tweets they agree w or even find interesting
What will Gate's "international solidarity" look like?

I fear it will look like more ways of bringing international money and influence to try to crush the plucky little resistance movement that has grown up in the UK.
It will involve the trans activist tail wagging the LGBT dog and then the LGBT tail wagging the global philanthropy dog towards more measures to try to make sure that anyone who might speak on concerns about gender identity ideology is scared or persuaded out of it
If there is anyone in the global open gov, democracy, philanthropy world is thinking about these developments they might want to commission a better report than the Gate hit job, to understand rather than set out to crush the positive deviance in the UK

Oh i should have linked to the thing itself....

gate.ngo/anti-gender-uk…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maya Forstater

Maya Forstater Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MForstater

1 Nov
The examples in the statutory code are v. odd.

They are coy about crucial bits of info

Like here. Was it a women's health spa? In which case yes it is legitimate to exclude members of the opposite sex

If it was a mixed sex spa why does the example only ref women complaining?
And this one - a female who has no surgery or medication but passes for male (is the EHRC on drugs?)

But it's a non threatening example.

Why no make it about a male who has no surgery and lives "as a woman"

Would be covered by S7. But should they be in the female spa??
And this one. A clothing store has a women's changing room . So it excludes men. Men can't just say "but there are cubicles!" They'd still be turned away presumably... So the cubicles don't make it ok
Read 4 tweets
31 Oct
Kemi Badenoch confirms "Providers have the right to restrict the use of spaces on the basis of sex, and exclude transgender people with or without a GRC if this is justified."

But what does "if this is justified" mean?

a-question-of-consent.net/2020/10/31/a-g…
The Equality Act allows for single sex spaces - including everyday privacy and dignity.

A single sex service means applying a sex based rule to the space
The question is does the Equality Act allow some people to claim that the sex based rules don't apply to them -- that some males can use female only spaces?

There isn't much specific case law on this - but there are good principles that apply from age discrimination cases.
Read 7 tweets
29 Oct
It's shocking that the @Commonswomequ Inquiry does not ask about the impact on women, but of course it can't because it has no word for them.

This erasure of the word is not just about Tampax marketing but about policy making.
Of course difficult women will answer w evidence on why this matters for women's rights

But established, funded womens groups, voluntary orgs, industry bodies will follow the ToRs which tell them from the start to discount women.

This happens in Equality Impact Assessments too.
Raising women's rights has been branded transphobic.

No one's asking about women so you have to be brave and difficult just to say there are women's rights at stake

It's shocking that after an amazing mobilisation of grassroots women's concerns that WESC don't see this
Read 6 tweets
28 Oct
The @Commonswomequ today announced a call for evidence on reform of the Gender Recognition Act

committees.parliament.uk/call-for-evide…
Select Committees are cross party groups of MPs.

This is not the government.

What they do is make recommendations to government, which the government have to respond to.
There is no formal template for inquiries. They can vary in length, with some published at short notice in response to high profile events.

This one is a tight timetable though.

Deadline is Friday November 27

(and it says it opened on October 6 🙄)
Read 17 tweets
27 Oct
This is the most shocking thing about @fawcettsociety fence sitting position

They say (with no evidence) that it is not safe or appropriate to house males who identify as women in the male estate.

They should be treated as women with "appropriate risk assessment"
That was in 2018 .

In 2020 they admitted that current brisk assessment processes are not reliable (so appropriate ones are just wishful thinking)

The prison system has to "find another way" ( but not in the male estate, they've already ruled that out).
As @Samsmethers said in her post on ways forward trans people want validation of identity , while womens concern is safety and dignity.

It is *inexplicable* that a woman's rights organisation should trade off womens safety for men's validation
fawcettsociety.org.uk/blog/sex-and-g…
Read 5 tweets
26 Oct
Whats happening? (as twitter asks...)

Sex.....
"Gender"..... the way society treats people because of their sex.
Feminist political organising, combined with (and enabled by) material progress - electricity, washing machines, contraception etc... has enabled greater equality for women
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!