United center-left vs center-right front might work. But our (c-right) primary solution (requiring testimony in public speech) puts us in opposition with the narrative and strategy of the Jewish c-left. Peterson was a bridge (token). Only Karl Smith (c-left econ) is honest.
https://twitter.com/ThruTheHayes/status/1322914618533122048
2) And I don't mean intentionally honest, because, (as in law) tort (dishonesty) does not require intent - it requires a failure of due diligence.
3) Eric is a mathematical economist but w/o full accounting. But he's one of the only people who can meaningfully discuss 'mathiness' problem he's encountered in physics and economics but hasn't himself escaped. For fellow supernerds this is probably the fundamental problem.
4) But we have no way of getting to that discussion. If we did then it's possible for right and left to have a scientific discussion of strategy and policy rather than shallow moralizing that is really just politics by sophistry and pseudoscience.
5) Unfortunately, since the Jewish left is largely responsible for the current conflict, despite center-left jews becoming aware of the consequences, and because my work explains why, and how to prevent the Abrahamic method of undermining, I'm 'burned' so to speak.
6) There are no other conservative intellectuals capable of discourse with Eric. None. And there may be no left intellectuals other than eric that could have that discussion. We'd never get Karl Smith. And there are no other honest (computationally competent) left economists.
7) So as usual. We repeat the historical cycle, repeat the Bolshevik revolution in the states, and the predictable counter-revolution. And we end up like Germany, Russia, and the western roman empire.
Those of us who grasp history are doomed by those who don't to repeat it.
Those of us who grasp history are doomed by those who don't to repeat it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
