Whenever I see Jeremy Corbyn interviewed nowadays, I'm always shocked. Shocked by his gaunt, exhausted appearance. He's aged 20 years in no time.

And the reason I'm shocked is: that was done to him. By a witchhunt the likes of which I've never seen done to anyone else anywhere.
There's people out there who won't be satisfied until the poor man's in a box. With gold handles.

Movements which speak of 'solidarity' do not do to decent, kind people.
Do you know what I think brought him down? Shame. On two levels:

1. Being made to feel ashamed for even existing for day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year, by a disgusting daily drumbeat of hysteria and nonsense.
2. Because he's a decent, kind man, personal shame too. He'll have asked himself again and again: "Am I an antisemite? So many people say I am, so am I?"

Because Corbyn, unlike the narcissists who usually lead political parties, DOES care about what others think.
In the end, the Labour Party and movement cannot just be about one man. That's a road to nowhere. As it is for the left elsewhere. The left has a horrible tendency to end up worshipping or idolising one individual.

But Corbyn's treatment has been despicable.
He inspired millions. He helped them believe that a better world was possible.

For that, one of the most corrupt countries in the advanced world treated him like he was Lucifer.

It's not and it will never be acceptable. In fact, it's terrifying.
The message it sends to young people who want to get involved in politics because, y'know, only the future of our entire species depends on it is:

"No. Fuck off. And if you don't do what we tell you, we won't just defeat you. We'll party on your grave".
Even in the US, while Bernie Sanders has many enemies, he was never ever treated remotely like this. He's inspired a whole new generation of brilliant young activists and politicians: many of them female and multi-ethnic. That's fantastic.
UK politics is worse than that. It is mean, it is cruel, it is nasty beyond belief.

When I voted for Keir Starmer, I believed he was on the side of the angels. I have mounting doubts about that. He cannot talk about "uniting the party" while making no effort to do so.
Unless his idea of "uniting the party" is to do so with a clenched fist from the top down? "Sit down, pay your subs and shut up". Not acceptable. Not in any way.

The left forms just as vital a part of the Labour Party as any other. It is brim full of vision and ideas.
Quite categorically, it does not deserve to be treated in such a dismissive, scornful, sneering, contemptuous way.

What happens to Corbyn now and what happens when the inquiry into the leaked report is published will be hugely instructive in that.
"Uniting the party" means reaching out. To all sides. It does not and can never mean silencing one part of the party and pushing it away.

The Labour movement should be such a force for good in Britain. Ultimately, that's up to the leader. To coin a phrase: I hope HE reflects.
Solidarity with Jeremy Corbyn.

#IStandWithJeremyCorbyn #ReinstateJeremyCorbyn

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shaun Lawson

Shaun Lawson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shaunjlawson

1 Nov
Margaret Thatcher? Supported Pinochet and Pol Pot; opposed sanctions on apartheid South Africa.

John Major? Met proscribed terrorist groups.

Tony Blair? Met proscribed terrorist groups, launched illegal war, oversaw torture and rendition, takes money from Saudi headchoppers.
David Cameron? Wrecked Libya and left it to be overwhelmed by terrorists, left migrants to drown in the sea.

Theresa May? Windrush, hostile environment - both as racist as it gets. And like Cameron, did deals with Saudi headchoppers.

Boris Johnson? A criminal and racist.
And Corbyn's 'interference' amounted to trying to SPEED THE PROCESS UP TO GET RID OF ANTISEMITES.

That same 'interference' was, plainly and obviously, commited by Keir Starmer on Thursday. As the brilliant @alexnunns explains:

Read 10 tweets
1 Nov
Angela: facts don't care about feelings. Nor should they ever do so.
- "To suggest that internet conspiracy theories about 5G, Bill Gates, microchips and plandemics are utter nonsense...
Whilst that might be true, it's completely unacceptable not to understand the hurt that causes internet conspiracy theorists"
- "To suggest that No Deal Brexit is an utter disaster and must be stopped at all costs...

Whilst that might be true, it's completely unacceptable not to understand the hurt that causes No Deal Brexiteers"
Read 5 tweets
1 Nov
Right then: schools. This is a profoundly emotive question. Nothing alarms most people more than the thought of children being put in harm's way - and my objection here isn't so much that they're staying open, but that Starmer has not properly explained why they need to.
Absolutely nobody anywhere thought - or thinks - that no children would or will contract Covid at school. That's impossible.

By the same token, the 'gotcha' graphs of case numbers from schools also miss the point.
The point being:

1. The number of children who'd have no proper meals at all if they weren't at school (if Marcus Rashford's campaign didn't educate you on that, then well...)

2. The number of children who live in cramped, unsafe, frequently abusive environments
Read 27 tweets
1 Nov
If you ever wanted an insight into how these disgusting people think and act, watch the video below.

Per @ChrisGiles_ of well-known Marxist conspiracy theory organ, the FT (!), there have already 67,500 excess deaths, with horrible numbers more to come.

Swayne denies this.
Worse: Swayne displays zero awareness, none whatsoever, of exponential growth. In that, he's not alone - as his fellow swivel-eyed loonies once again confirm they don't understand basic maths,

They didn't over Brexit. They don't over No Deal Brexit. They don't over Covid either.
Exponential growth and the time it takes for patients to die mean that for the next 2 weeks, minimum:

- Case numbers are GUARANTEED to rise alarmingly
- Death numbers are GUARANTEED to rise alarmingly

It's only after that that we'll see if these measures work.
Read 7 tweets
31 Oct
Question for all those who say Labour are "the same as the Tories" and Blair was "the same as the Tories" - hence Labour's lead now and Blair's three election wins.

You do realise what you're saying is that the British electorate must be quite massively Tory?
And if the British electorate is, based on your argument, quite massively Tory, exactly how do you suppose a left wing platform will ever win?

By the way, it *isn't* quite massively Tory. Like most electorates, it wants a combination of competence and compassion.
But forced to choose between one and the other, it will always favour the party it sees as more competent. Because elections are not charities.
Read 10 tweets
31 Oct
Just a quick note on that IPSOS MORI poll showing Labour 5 points ahead - and ahead on 'Fit to Govern' for the first time since it started measuring that almost a decade ago.

'Il Sorpasso' is both the title of a 1962 Italian comedy film and a phrase that's used in polling.
In the latter case, it effectively means 'the decisive shift': the moment one party goes past the other and will stay there.

We've not reached Il Sorpasso yet - and we're a fair way off doing so. When will we do so?

When Labour go past the Tories on economic competence.
When does one party go past the other on economic competence? When there's a crash or political disaster involving the government.

Tories have been ahead - often, miles ahead - on economic competence since 2008.

Labour were ahead - often, way ahead - between 1992 and 2008.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!