Kind of inevitable Farage would return. Be interesting to see whether he is once again able to mobilise distrust and discontent when his two winning issues - immigration and Europe - are no longer at the top of the agenda.
The problem for Farage is that opposing lockdown is a libertarian stance, while the kind of voters he ha traditionally appealed to are older authoritarian types who are generally very keen on lockdowns.
As for government reform that’s not an issue to send anyone to the barricades unless it can be married to populist or nationalist resentments. Still, the Scottish elections next year may soon give him a target for such resentments in England
All that said, there are a lot of 2019 Tory voters who are at present, for a whole range of reasons, not at all happy with the government.
Many may be willing to indicate support in polls for a vaguely defined Farage vehicle as a way of expressing their discontent.
If they do, a media class always eager for new stories about electoral volatility and ever eager to give Farage attention will no doubt hype up any poll showing for the Reform party of over 5%
Then said hype will in turn get Farage’s message in front of many more voters, potentially further driving up his poll numbers, and then triggering lots of “Tory panic about Farage stories” which set the virtuous (for Nigel) circle turning again
Wouldn’t be at all surprised to see a reform party bubble in the polls, if not now, then sometime in the next 18 months

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rob Ford

Rob Ford Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @robfordmancs

26 Oct
*Sigh*. Disappointing to see that Guardian, like many media orgs, continues to focus exclusively on the "numbers game" Q, which is a poor way to measure imm attitudes. 1/2
2/2 In the article, authors acknowledge "people had generally moved away from the belief that the costs of immigration outweigh the benefits". That is a *better* measure of views to imm, but is dismissed because it doesn't fit alarmist framing of authors
We observe in survey data repeatedly that people default to saying they want "a little less" immigration *regardless* of immigration levels. It is just a default response pattern. It is informative in that it highlights that many ppl default to seeing imm as a negative thing
Read 5 tweets
15 Oct
Brexitland is out today! To celebrate the release of our new book I'm going to put up a graph a day here highlighting some of the big themes we discuss.

Graph 1: share of graduates and school leavers in the population 1986-2016 Image
Educational expansion has reshaped our nation over past few decades. In the Thatcher years, nearly half of voters had no educational qualifications at all, and fewer than 10% had a university degree.

School leavers outnumbers graduates 2:1 when Blair was first elected in 1997
By the time of the EU referendum, graduates were one quarter of the electorate, and voters with no qualifications had fallen to 20%.

The shift is still ongoing - the share of graduates rises about 0.7 points a year, the share with GCSEs or less declines over a point a year
Read 60 tweets
20 Aug
This claim re: trust in the BBC bothered me a bit - the decline seemed implausibly large and, to the extent there has been a decline in trust, this seemed unlikely to be a BBC story.
So I did a little bit of digging around. Here's the latest MORI polling (2020) which shows when asked to choose a single most trusted news source, 62% said the BBC, far ahead of any other source: ipsos.com/sites/default/…
Here is some recent polling from YouGov which, again, shows that trust in the BBC is higher than in any other outlet: yougov.co.uk/topics/media/a…
Read 15 tweets
5 Jul
I'm unsure whether the rolling back of lockdown restrictions is going too quickly, but I *am* sure that the level of doom-mongering about it from some, all sharing the same pictures of that one Soho street, is overblown theguardian.com/world/2020/jul…
In a country of 65M plus people, basically *every* weekend there will be some pocket of bad behaviour. This gets amplified out of all proportion every single time because people nervous about lockdown or angry at the Conservatives share it like crazy
Until we get a vaccine, this country and others are going to have to engage in a constant v difficult balancing act in terms of social behaviour. People freaking out & flooding social media with angry rangs about one street or one beach every damn weekend isn't going to help that
Read 8 tweets
25 Jun
As Sunder rightly points out, the sample Kaufmann presents as representative of "liberal opinion" in his latest Quillette diatribe is nothing of the sort. The items he presents as demonstrating evidence of liberal support for a cultural revolution are also nothing of the sort 1/?
Here are the items he finds majority support for among his (unrepresentative) sample of (self-identified) liberals:
Rebalancing art in museums to better reflect national demography
Public consultation on a new national anthem better reflecting diversity
Rewilding parks 2/?
[ctd] Rebalancing history curricula
Rebalancing public statues by removing white and replacing with other groups
"Gradually replace" older buildings with new ones that "don't perpetuate a Eurocentric order" (nope, me neither)
3?
Read 21 tweets
23 Jun
Giving people leeway to assess their own risks makes no sense in this situation, because if people at low risk engage in more contact, then the epidemic spirals and it becomes impossible for people at high risk to avoid the virus
Imagine millions of twentysomethings decide its fine to go out partying again. Some pass on the disease to people who are also themselves low risk but come into regular contact with the elderly or the immunocompromised. Who, if they have care needs, cannot avoid this contact
Meanwhile some will get ill enough to be hospitalised, exposing healthcare workers to a greater risk of infection. Many of whom are at higher risk due to being rather older. Many such healthcare workers have died already.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!