All five are important. We have focussed a lot on sustenance and destruction in past 1000 years
Times were such. Sustenance and destruction were key traits needed to Hindus. Hence vishNu and shiva are the most prevalent dèvatās in last 1000 years.
Dèvī is extremely prevalent too. Māyā needed to maintain the dvaita and do required puruShārtha and parākrama to defend dharma
gaNapati prevalent only in mahārāshTra. And here and there in other KrishNa-Godāvari basin states.
Other regions have very few temples where gaNapati is the main presiding deity (except those built by Marathas)
But anugraha part is at least alive in some parts of India.
But the creation or the creative part is sūrya-brahmadèva. Now brahmadèva in his four-headed form cannot be worshipped widely (BhRgu’s shāpa).
But we used to worship creator/creativity in form of sūrya nonetheless. There is a reason why Shruti calls viranchi as hiraNyagarbha.
Hindus have neglected it in last 1000 years.
Hindus need to worship and invoke the creator now.
Rest of India needs to worship and invoke anugraha kāraka gaNapati now (happening slowly in cities - surprisingly thanks to Bollywood actually - but I will take it).
I believe preserving gāNapatya tradition gave a certain edge to western coast of India in medieval times as opposed to rest of India
First deed that Shivaji did was jīrNoddhāra and punah-prāNapratishTHāpanā of a desecrated and abandoned gaNapati in Pune.
The shrauta dharma (I think all four vedas and at least one of their branches) are very well preserved in Gurukulas of western India. This is very unique. @vvaayu can confirm this. He told this to me long ago (or so I remember) and I was surprised.
We need to popularise sūrya upāsanā to jumpstart Hindu creativity.
We need to popularise gaNapati upāsanā in rest of India to jumpstart Hindu “awakening”.
Yes. When Hindus gave up daily sandhyā Vandana (which is mandatory to every Hindu), we threw away our best asset
Even Brahmins are giving it up now, kicking away the ladder that put them where they are. And looking at this downfall of Brahmins, others feel it’s OK too
Bhai @harshmadhusudan - nirishwarvaadi is different from atheist. It is also different from not following any rituals (which Savarkar stopped in his later life).
But his death itself was an elaborate and difficult Yogic and Hindu ritual
Here "I" is aatma. The transcendance of Aatma beyond time, space and matter - it being immortal (amruta) etc is fundamental vaidik position. It arises out of the principle of apaurusheyatva of vedas.
One wears upanayana on ear during excretion (urine/stools). Women have third level of excretion (menstruation). Difficult wear janeu on ear for 4-5 days at a stretch.
Post that, one would need discard old & take up new janeu in new month.
Point is - only one who has a Pvt puja room May do it, provided she somehow uncomfortably tackles the janeu management around ear problem for four days.
Shuddha “Satva-rajas-tamas” trio of triguNātmakā mūla-prakruti become Vishnu-Brahmā-Shiva when they manifest themselves on adhidaivik plane
When they descend down to more jaDa level, they manifest themselves as Kapha-pitta-vāta of Indriya and body.
Balance is the key.
Out of the trio, shuddha-satva is the hardest bond and last to cut. Signified by Shri Vishnu.
Hence Shruti proclaims shri vishNu as “इंद्रस्य युज्यं सखा” (one who is almost an inseparable and linked “friend/cohabitor” of Indra [real seer : drashTā - puruSha])