A vote is not a valentine.

It seems that we differ, more publicly and more virulently, in our politics, than we ever have before. We are imagining the worst in each other. Fueled by anger and tribalism, we conflate disagreement with an idea, with dislike for a person. [1/11]
I didn’t vote for Trump, although to my surprise, I did consider it this year. I also didn’t vote for Biden. Both have disastrous potential. Many on the left see imminent threats from our own side. For having this opinion, we are called blind, racist, traitors, fascists, more. 2/
In 1992, riots erupted in Los Angeles, after Rodney King was beaten on camera by police officers, and a jury then acquitted the officers of assault. In the midst of those riots, Rodney King famously asked, “Can we all get along?” 3/
It seemed laughable to me at the time, Rodney King’s appeal to peace and calm. Of course we can’t all get along. We’re barbarous apes after all. 4/
But I’ve changed my tune. Yes, we’re competitive and territorial, and these qualities have the capacity to derange us. But we are also collaborative and loving, and these qualities have the capacity to enhance us. 5/
In 1651, Hobbes wrote that the lives of humans without a central government are “nasty, brutish and short.” He was right, to a point. The state helps keep our worst parts in check. We seek the equilibrium wherein it can step back, and allow us to discover our best parts. 6/
"The surest defense against Evil is extreme individualism, originality of thinking, whimsicality, even - if you will - eccentricity. That is, something that can't be feigned, faked, imitated; something even a seasoned imposter couldn't be happy with." -Joseph Brodsky, 1984. 7/
And this, from the great Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. I shared this, along with the Brodsky quotation above, on #DarkHorseLive27, in the end of June 2020. 8/
Family turning against one another, some factions admonishing their adherents that they must disavow their loved ones if they do not conform—we are falling, foolishly and ravenously and exuberantly, into our worst selves. 9/
reuters.com/article/us-usa…
I have made a list of readings—history, philosophy, fiction—that explores human nature and our politics; time, memory, and resistance; emotion, manipulation, and truth. Normally it would be for my Patreon subscribers only, but this is available to all. 10/
patreon.com/posts/43467998
I will end here, once more, with the words of Rodney King. Naïve? Perhaps. Optimistic? Yes. Prescient? Let us most fervently hope.

“Can we all get along?”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Heather E Heying

Heather E Heying Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HeatherEHeying

6 Oct
On this day I am grateful. I am grateful for all the usual—love & partnership, home & hearth, the prospect of adventures to come.

Today I am also grateful for the moon, waning, high in the sky on a blue sky morning. And a grassy hill, with one tree, in whose shade I can sit. 1/4
I am grateful for a perfectly brewed cappuccino from a café that also sells art, the walls lined with beauty, the owner wondering how to proceed in these strange times, told that her efforts are noticed, appreciated. 2/4
I am grateful for the sounds of activity and connection, traveling up the air of this park where I sit: the scrape of a skateboard on concrete, the pop of tennis balls against racquets; the romping of dogs playing. 3/4
Read 4 tweets
30 Sep
Here are three conversations that brought me hope, laughter, and depth of understanding. Six outstanding humans sharing thoughts about childhood, language, society, what is coming and what to do now. The common theme: all six are unflinching.

What a gift.
From two of my favorite people: @FreeRangeKids talked with @meghan_daum on her terrific new podcast, @TheUnspeakPod (and I’m not just saying that because I was lucky to be Meghan’s first guest):
theunspeakablepodcast.podbean.com/e/how-to-let-y…
The always surprising @JohnHMcWhorter in conversation with @SamHarrisOrg is something to behold. This conversation felt audacious, and audacity is exactly what we need now.
samharris.org/subscriber-ext…
Read 4 tweets
24 Jun
“Men menstruate. Some have even given birth.” If you disagree, you are “attacking trans lives,” and likely one of those deplorables who support Trump.

I’m no Trump supporter, just a biologist who knows that this “new trans reality” is a dangerous fiction.
nytimes.com/2020/06/23/opi…
“The only difference between a trans woman and a cisgender woman is the sex assigned to her at birth.”

No. Really not.

Most people know this is flat out wrong.

Most people who hear this nod abjectly, eyes averted, hoping this will pass by and leave them intact.
Again, no.

The vast majority of us who call bullshit on reality-denial are not “anti-trans.”

Nature is not anarchic re: sex. We have 2 types of gametes, by which we sexually reproduce. Small and mobile -> sperm -> male. Large and sessile -> egg -> female. Where’s the anarchy? Image
Read 5 tweets
17 Jun
This is how it’s done.

Proclaim something to be true that is patently not. Do not mock those who disagree. Not yet. Instead, ask them, with sadness in your eyes, why you cannot just be generous and kind.

If they resist, shame them. (1/12)
nytimes.com/2020/06/16/mov…
Most people will roll their eyes and move on. At first.

But after repeated exposure to the thing-that-is-proclaimed-to-be-true-that-patently-is-not, some will begin to question their understanding of reality. Now you make your next move. 2/
Most people have an inadequate knowledge of biology (and other manifestations of reality), and know this. When pushed to the limits of what they are sure of, they may entrench (“er, no, men and women are different…?”) or they may cede small points. 3/
Read 12 tweets
8 Jun
Totalitarianism always flies in on the wings of beautiful ideals.

It lands gently, flatters you and charms you, makes you feel smart for recognizing how beautiful it is.

Do not be fooled. It is dangerous. Those ideals? They are not what they seem. (1/23)
Democracy’s ability to reveal value depends on its members being able to freely decide what they think, and what they say. 2/
How do we assess truth, and how do we assess value?

The “naturalistic fallacy” reminds us that that which *is* true (e.g. in nature) is not inherently that which *ought* to be true. Truth and value are, therefore, distinct and unique. 3/
Read 23 tweets
7 Jun
I thought “safe spaces” were necessary to protect the sensitive ears, hearts and minds of the youth from ideas they find troubling. Why is discomfort only laudable when it’s other people being uncomfortable? (thread 1/5)
Pandering to the mob is a big part of what’s wrong with the democrats now.

The quote above is from Hillary Clinton’s new essay, in which she condemns racism. #SoBrave 2/
medium.com/@HillaryClinto…
In her essay, Clinton aptly recommends fiction by Alice Walker and Toni Morrison. Yes. These are exquisite writers, who have written excellent books, and we can all learn from them. 3/
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!