Amazon's ACX is a self-serve audiobook production platform: writers spend thousands of dollars to produce audiobooks of their own work. Amazon strongly incentivizes ACX producers to sell exclusively through Audible (which also distributes to Itunes).

1/
If you go exclusive, you get a better split of the proceeds - 40%. That's right: though you bore all production costs and Amazon has no costs associated with selling your audiobook, Amazon still keeps the majority of the revenue from it, even if you grant them exclusivity.

2/
As unfair as that may sound, it gets a LOT worse. As part of its effort to lure customers to Audible, Amazon now grants no-questions-asked returns on audiobooks, and claws back the lost revenue from those returns from the audiobook creators.

susanmaywriter.net/single-post/au…

3/
Amazon's return policy is very generous: you can return an audiobook for a full refund for a full year after you buy it. When you finish the book, the Audible app even shows you a "return book" button. Hit it and you get a refund.

4/
But Amazon won't tell its authors how many returns they're getting. The only way to estimate is to sell a book for a month, take it out of circulation the next month, and see how far below zero the book's net sales are in a month when it isn't even for sale.

5/
If you sold 10 copies in April, take the book off the market, and "sell" -5 copies in May, your returns are probably 50%.

This is the system creators have bootstrapped because Amazon, the world's most aggressive retail data-collector, somehow can't provide this number.

6/
These authors spend thousands of dollars though an Amazon self-publishing platform, then the company conspires with unscrupulous readers to confiscate their payments, making the system more attractive off the backs of creators.

7/
And here's the sting in the tail: if you opt for "Amazon exclusive," you are locked in for SEVEN YEARS. Amazon silently made the switch to "no hassle returns" and clawed back half its creators' money, with no chance to opt out.

8/
Amazon gets to change its deal with creators when it wants to, but the creators don't get to change their deal with Amazon. For seven years after they spend thousands to produce their own audiobooks, they are locked to Amazon, regardless of Amazon's policy changes.

9/
Seven.

Years.

Audible controls 90% of the audiobook market.

Image:
Paris 16 (modified)
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Atte…

CC BY-SA
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa…

Dmitry Baranovskiy (modified)
thenounproject.com/term/ink-pen/1…

CC BY
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.…

eof/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Cory Doctorow #BLM

Cory Doctorow #BLM Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @doctorow

3 Nov
Highlander, Parking fight intro sequence (1986) wilwheaton.tumblr.com/post/633782023…
Highlander, Parking fight intro sequence (1986) wilwheaton.tumblr.com/post/633782023…
Highlander, Parking fight intro sequence (1986) wilwheaton.tumblr.com/post/633782023…
Read 5 tweets
3 Nov
Today's Twitter threads (a Twitter thread).

Inside: Deep Reckonings; Past Performance is Not Indicative of Future Results; How Audible robs indie audiobook creators; Get an extra vote; A hopeful future; and more!

Archived at: pluralistic.net/2020/11/03/som…

#Pluralistic

1/ Image
Deep Reckonings: Using deepfakes to conjure a contrafactual reality in which monsters confront their legacies.



2/ Image
Past Performance is Not Indicative of Future Results: The limits of theory-free statistical inference.



3/ Image
Read 18 tweets
3 Nov
I've been talking to @Polygon's @TashaRobinson about my books for nearly two decades. She was one of the reviewers to dig into Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom, my debut novel, all the way back in 2003 when she was at @TheOnion's @TheAVClub.

aux.avclub.com/cory-doctorow-…

1/ Image
She's always had smart things to say about my books (and is never shy about criticizing them) so I was delighted to talk with her about my latest, ATTACK SURFACE, for an interview: "Cory Doctorow on his drive to inspire positive futures."

polygon.com/2020/11/2/2154…

2/
As the title suggests, the interview digs into the relationship between our narratives about the future and the future itself when it arrives - the delights and perils of dystopianism, a philosophy that I find seductive even as I reject it.

3/
Read 19 tweets
3 Nov
Today on @xkcd, an "Election Impact Score Sheet" that turns on the theory that "reminders from friends and family to vote have a bigger effect on turnout than anything campaigns do."

xkcd.com/2380/

1/
It's a call to action: if you have friends or family PA, ME, AK, MT, NM, WI, MI, IO, NC, NH, GA, NE, MI, FL, KS, MI or CO, drop them a line today - text, call, email - and remind them to vote. Prioritize these calls in roughly that order.

2/
If the people you reach need help with their plan to vote, refer them to a guide like this one, and help them work through it, figuring it out together.

projects.fivethirtyeight.com/how-to-vote-20…

3/
Read 5 tweets
3 Nov
My latest @locusmag column is "Past Performance is Not Indicative of Future Results," an essay about the limits of machine learning and the reason that statistical inference will not lead to consciousness.

locusmag.com/2020/11/cory-d…

1/
At its core, machine-learning is "theory free correlation-detection" - that is, it takes training data and finds things that appear together in it. Two things labeled an eye and one thing labeled a nose and one thing labeled a mouth all add up to a face.

2/
But the classifier doesn't know what a noses, eyes, or mouths are. It doesn't know what a face is. Your doorbell camera doesn't know that the face-like thing in the melting snow on your walk CAN'T be a face, so it repeatedly warns you about a stranger on your doorstep.

3/
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!