I bought this shirt one day in 2015 on which I had back-to-back meetings with two heads of NSD: the incumbent, John Carlin, at DOJ, and @DavidKris, one of his predecessors, whom I was meeting for a drink at the Hotel Sofitel afterwards.
It was cloudy out, but I decided to walk the several blocks between DOJ and the Sofitel, which is right next to the White House. Mistake. A few blocks into the walk, the sky opened up, there was not a cab in sight, and I and my suit were completely drenched.
I mean really drenched.
The thought of having a drink with David like a shivering wet rat was, uh, unappealing, and while my pants and shoes were a hopeless case, I figured I could at least get a different dry shirt, a dry one.
The only store that sells clothing right there was an outfit called the White House gift shop, which sells overpriced tchotchkes to tourists. Mere shirts are not their thing; think, instead, commemorative coins, gold-leafed Christmas tree ornaments—that sort of thing.
But they did have one shirt: a nice t-shirt with a beautifully embroidered presidential seal. I snatched it up, went across the street, changed shirts in the bathroom, and found @DavidKris.
On November 12, 2016, I put the shirt away, tweeting that I would not wear it again until I had reason to have pride in the presidency again. I take it out today because #itsddaymotherfuckers and today is either going to justify the shirt—or, if we’re going down on the beaches...
...it’s the shirt I want to get shot in.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Models.
The big analytical winners here are the modelers. If you look at @NateSilver538’s model, for example, this results is at the edge of the fat part of his distribution. @micahcohen
The President of the United States has declared this week, "National Character Counts Week." Let's examine his proclamation line by line: whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
"The foundation of any free and virtuous society is the moral character of its people."
I wholeheartedly agree.
"Personal responsibility, integrity, and the other values which define our unique American spirit underpin our system of self-government and inspire us to continue working toward a more perfect Union. "
The person who should write such a thread is @BobbyChesney, who did pioneering studies of how conspiracy and material support law changes pushed the criminal law further and further to the left of boom.
But the bottom line as pertains to this case is threefold: (1) conspiracy law is very broad. If you agree with one other person (or 12) to commit a serious felony and take a single overt act in furtherance of that agreement, you are guilty.
(2) under case law, the FBI is legally allowed to get deeply involved in facilitating your conspiracy by way of investigating it without getting anywhere near the line of entrapment, which requires that they induce you to commit the crime.
I refuse to discuss Amy Coney Barrett’s jurisprudence or character or views. The issue of her nomination should not be about that. It should be about the fact of her nomination in the first place.
The nomination stands for the proposition that an impeached president who demanded that a seat on the Supreme Court be held open for him to fill only four years ago should be able to fill a seat with only 38 to go before he faces the voters.