One thing that does seem clear in the Election Day numbers is that the GOP vote came out early but the vote is becoming less Republican (and more indie) over the course of the day.
e.g. in Broward County (the rare FL county where Democrats are winning the Election Day vote)

From 7am to 1030am, the vote was D38/R34/I28 (D +4)
From 1030 to 1230pm, it was D39/R31/I31 (D +8)
From 1230 to 3pm, it was D37/R26/I37 (D +11)
From 3pm to 4pm, Broward was D41/R26/I33 (D +15). So this gap keeps growing.
I know that it's not uncommon to see these sort of shifts, but these seem like pretty sharp ones. It could be that the voters who showed up at 7am (usually enthusiastic/reliable voters) were atypically Republican because the most enthusiastic Dems voted early or by mail.
Among other things I would be VERY CAREFUL WITH EARLY EXIT POLLS. Even more so than usual. If there are big splits in the partisan composition of the electorate over the course of the day, and we're seeing that in FL, AZ and NV, exits conducted early on could be quite misleading.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nate Silver

Nate Silver Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NateSilver538

5 Nov
If you take a weighted average of these counties, they're about 15 points bluer than Georgia overall, based on the results of the 2016 election.
Although there do seem to be about 12,000 votes in other/unspecified counties in this tally. If we assume the unspecified counties are slightly redder/rural than the state on average and voted for Trump by +10 in 2016, then that would make the average more like 11 points bluer.
A few more counties here, although not enough to get up to 61,000 votes. Assuming unspecified counties went Trump +10 in 2016, the outstanding vote is in counties that are D +9 relative to the state.

Read 5 tweets
4 Nov
You could debate the order. I think WI is actually the most certain since I don't see many ways for Trump to gain votes there. The same probably holds for NV although *in theory* it's possible late-arriving mail votes could be red if R's waited longer to send in their ballots.
AZ is the only one of the four that's been *called* by anyone, including the AP, which is usually pretty cautious, but some AZ-focused data folks think that was too aggressive.
There's a LOT of vote left to count in MI and I haven't spent too much time looking at it myself, but it *seems* like it's mostly mail votes from blue counties which you'd think would be quite good for Biden.
Read 5 tweets
4 Nov
I believe it's the city of Green Bay, specifically, that's unreported. I think both election day vote *and* absentees in Green Bay are uncounted, and that the rest of the country is in. Green Bay went narrowly to Clinton in 2016.
So I don't think there's much upside for Trump in Brown County. If it's *all* Green Bay, those ballots should be slightly blue. If it's only Green Bay absentees, they should be quite blue. (I think it's all of Green Bay, not just the absentees.)
The reason I'm using terms like "believe" and "think" is because I'm trying to infer from this rather confusing note on the Brown Co. website, plus one very brief conversation I had. Image
Read 4 tweets
4 Nov
Not sure what this is about, but Decision Desk HQ has Biden a tiny tiny bit ahead in Wisconsin now. results.decisiondeskhq.com/2020/general/w… Image
I believe they don't have the Kenosha absentees counted, either, which netted like 10k for Biden. Image
Did DDHQ get its hands on the Milwaukee absentees? Or is this something different? All night long there hasn't been a whole lot of clarity on exactly how many uncounted votes there have been in Milwaukee County, so I really don't know.
Read 4 tweets
4 Nov
If there's a shift in focus here, it's that we're sort of going from "make inferences about MI/WI/PA based on results from other states" to "it's close enough to the end to actually try to count the votes there." This is especially so in WI, which is faster to count than MI/PA.
You'd *infer* that Biden was in pretty good shape in WI based on his winning MN plus his large leads in pre-election polls. But it's not quite exactly what's out there beyond a lot of Milwaukee absentees, which should make the race much closer but may or may not put Biden ahead.
There are also absentee ballots left to be counted in Kenosha, apparently. The WI absentees are likely to be very blue, so a few unreported absentees here and there in non-Milwaukee cities could make a fairly big difference.
Read 4 tweets
3 Nov
All right, folks, here's our last PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION UPDATE of 2020 to accompany our final forecast. fivethirtyeight.com/features/final…
At the end here, our model defaults to a very "polls-only" forecast. So here's our version of a "no tossups" map based on final polling average in each state. Very unlikely that all of these turn out right as NC, ME-2, GA, OH, IA, TX all within 2 points.
If Biden beats his forecast by 3 points nationally, here's the map you wind up with instead, with OH, IA and TX flipping blue.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!