Oh alright then I guess that's settled

--

"If the bond has been issued in the last week, we will steer clear of that bond," Dr Lowe said, "We are doing this partly because we want to avoid any possibility that people see us as financing the government."

afr.com/policy/economy…
How stupid do you have to be to find this remotely credible?

--

"Dr Lowe drew a distinction between "providing finance" and "affecting the cost of that finance".

"The RBA is not providing finance to the government, but our actions are lowering the cost of government finance.""
I can think of, oh, I dunno, one pretty big difference in what happens to those payments.

--

"He said the bonds purchased by the RBA will have to be repaid by the government at maturity "in exactly the same way as would occur if the bonds were held by others".
I get that it's the RBA's job to pretend they aren't doing the-thing-they-are-clearly-doing, but making such transparently false and unconvincing arguments doesn't help their cause.

If you can't do better than this, just don't say anything.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rohan Grey

Rohan Grey Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rohangrey

4 Aug
After thinking more about @TheStalwart's argument that Microsoft should pay a fee to govt to offset the undue benefits it gets from a govt-induced acquisition, I've decided I think it's a bad idea (no shade at Joe, the motivation is sound). The reason is that the real benefit to
Microsoft long term is not in acquiring a specific product or business but in expanding its already vast data empire. The problem is that the social harms and risks posed by that kind of expansion can't be offset by "paying money". Once the data is collected and consolidated the
Damage is done. In this sense, making Microsoft pay a fee is the firm-level equivalent to trying to impose a tax on data-gathering as a solution to the threat of surveillance capitalism. It's a category error to think this risk can be stripped from larger social context, priced
Read 6 tweets
24 Jul
One of the bait-and-switches that JG opponents make, in addition to pretending a JG and UI are competing rather than complementary policies, is to claim in one breath that unconditional income is necessary to recognize and reward all the forms of informal labor not captured by a
JG, and then in the next claim that there simply cannot be enough productive work for everyone to be employed. It allows them to claim that they are truly committed to remunerating labor, even as they are, regrettably, concluding some people are just too unproductive and useless
To ever work. And of course, hidden underneath it all is a theory of "productivity" that has no problem with the private sector employing people in all sorts of socially handful jobs, and no problem with the human costs of unemployment beyond merely the lack of income. Ultimately
Read 5 tweets
15 May
@jasonfurman Jason, this is wrong on several levels.

1) As @NathanTankus notes here (), the Fed is ultimately responsible for determining the distribution of long vs short-term govt liabilities in circulation, regardless of what Treasury issues in the first instance.
@jasonfurman @NathanTankus So financing deficits by issuing long-term bonds does not “lock in” low long-term rates for Tsy, since the Fed can and will always ‘sterilize’ that action by purchasing those bonds and replacing them with short-term reserves to meet its preferred maturity distribution curve,
@jasonfurman @NathanTankus which leaves us back in the exact same position from a consolidated govt perspective.

2) This also ignores the significant psychological and practical effects of transitioning from the current budget process to using overt monetary financing. Presently huge swaths of the public
Read 17 tweets
16 Apr
***BREAKING***

I am thrilled to announce that the full legislative text of the #ABCAct bill to #MintTheCoin is now public:

tlaib.house.gov/sites/tlaib.ho…

More details are available in the press release here:

tlaib.house.gov/media/press-re…
I'll discuss details below, but 1st, a huge shout out to @RepRashida (@RashidaTlaib) & her brilliant staff for their vision, courage & leadership.

It's been thrilling to watch the bill take form, and I look forward to it being passed into law & providing urgent relief to all.
Special thanks to @PramilaJayapal, as well as @RepChuyGarcia, @RepHastingsFL, @EleanorNorton, @AOC, @IlhanMN, @AyannaPressley, @RepBobbyRush, @janschakowsky, & @NydiaVelazquez, for cosponsoring the bill.

Solidarity between progressive leaders is a beautiful thing to see.
Read 22 tweets
15 Apr
@StephanieKelton - preach!
Never thought i'd see the day when Fed-Tsy remittance policy gets multiple paragraphs in the NYTimes...
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!