When we were negotiating to join the EEC, even before we had come to terms, there were a few court cases...
First there is Blackburn vs Attorney General. Raymond Blackburn took the government to court arguing that a referendum or an election was needed to sign over that level of sovereignty. He lost.
Why are the press being rude for Trump not accepting the result? Because the Revolution of 1800 is a US event they pride themselves on the first peaceful transfer of power.
It's not just an important part of democracy, it's a very important part of US democracy.
Kenya hasn't always grown and exported so many flowers, but it now exports them in serious volumes.
In the Patrick Minford model of trade this happened because the Lomé agreement was signed in the mid-1970s, but the growth did not come as a result of the trade deal.
You've already concluded one agreement where you've legislated in such a way as you can break international law. This is all just nationalistic bullshit.
1. Fish is one of the sticking points of a new deal, so let’s talk about why this is going to be a difficult thing for the UK to negotiate. (Thread)
2. Fishing limits are a protectionist trade off between In-shore fishing deep sea fishing. The bigger the exclusion zone countries set for in-shore fishing, the more deep sea fishing is impacted.
3. Although, when it comes to wildlife, conservation is actually important, and this was the argument Iceland made when they wanted to increase the 3 mile limit set by the North Sea Fisheries Convention of 1882.
They are offering the right to regulate, it's in the proposal. It does *not* control our legislative freedom, what it does it set a standard that we both agree on.
The UK continues to say that their standards are better, and that they won't lower theirs beyond that of the EU.