There is some truth to this analysis, in the following sense: Both sides see the election as existential. The asymmetry, though, is that only one side is correct. The Trumpist/GOP believes many false and delusional things, and we need to reckon with that problem.
It's not enough to talk about how both sides feel about things, we need to analyze what motivates both sides' feelings.
Dems correctly see that science is being ignored, the pandemic is running rampant, the economy is in a shambles, and the Trumpist GOP is corrupting the democratic process enormously.
The Trumpists believe Trump when he says we're "rounding the corner" on the epidemic, that the epidemic will all disappear quickly, that he's "making America great again" (whatever that means),and that the economy is doing well. This is all nonsense.
When people believe nonsense and it motivates them strongly, in spite of all arguments to the contrary, then we have to realize that they are in a cult. This is the fundamental problem. Cultists need to be deprogrammed, but this is hard to do.
Here's a good analysis of the quandary facing Dems as they consider how this all went down. No simple answers. The racist, fascist cult is hard to defeat in a country where racism is systemic and authoritarians are everywhere. We need to see this clearly.
The fact that this election, after all Trump and the GOP have done, is even close is evidence for this point of view. The authoritarian racist cultists are numerous, and the coalition of the decent may not be enough to defeat them.
The negligence and incompetence of Trump and the GOP are responsible for more than 100,000 pandemic dead, for example, and will be responsible for thousands more, particularly if Trump is re-elected. ncdp.columbia.edu/custom-content…
Here's evidence of all the ways Trump and the GOP have been trying to corrupt the election:
Here's a great thread listing all the unAmerican things the Trump GOP have done in the past four years. Ripping children from their parents' arms. Ignoring Americans hard hit by natural disasters. Coddling our enemies. Nepotism. Unprecedented corruption.
How can any sane rational person vote for such incompetence, malevolence, and corruption? Nobody sane or rational could. That means that people who vote for it are not sane or rational. They are in a cult. We need to reckon with that reality. /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Koomey

Jonathan Koomey Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jgkoomey

4 Nov
I like to summarize Brandolini's law as "it takes ten times longer to debunk nonsense than to create nonsense". It describes a fundamental asymmetry related to misinformation. ordrespontane.blogspot.com/2014/07/brando…
Here's a corollary to that "law": It is a thousand times harder to debunk nonsense than it is to SPREAD nonsense, making the debunking process even tougher and more time dependent.
This is just another way of saying what Jonathan Swift said in 1710: "Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it; so that when Men come to be undeceiv’d, it is too late; the Jest is over, and the Tale has had its Effect…" quoteinvestigator.com/2014/07/13/tru…
Read 4 tweets
6 Oct
I had some fun digging back into our archives. The existence of a huge offshore wind potential in UK has been known for many years. The recent technology cost improvements are spectacular and impressive, and they've enabled more rapid tapping of that resource than anticipated.
In our technical potential analysis for the EC5 (Germany, France, Italy, Netherlands, and the UK) back in 1995 (!) we found that about 40% of total wind potential for those countries combined was in the UK offshore wind/coastal resource.
That was for 50 M hub height, and obviously the turbines have gotten much bigger, with much higher hub heights, bigger swept area, and higher capacity factors than anticipated back then.
Read 6 tweets
5 Oct
We need a balance between corporate and government power, but the scale has been tipped in favor of corporate power in the US for a very long time.
We need an honest debate about the role of government in a modern society. Anyone who says that government needs to be "small enough to be drowned in a bathtub" must be excluded from that conversation. They are not good faith participants.
In a modern capitalist society, well-functioning government is a necessity. Otherwise we get lead in children's toys, poisoned rivers, salmonella in our chicken, workers hurt in unsafe factories, and an unstable climate. We know this from history and from the present.
Read 5 tweets
4 Oct
Yesterday I wrote a thread about why even small carbon dioxide charges can be useful for reducing emissions in certain sectors (but not others).
One of my colleagues rightly asked that I lay out my data and calculations, so this thread does that. If you find any issues with the calcs or data, please let me know.
The main claim (ignoring the peripheral questions about jet fuel) is that a carbon dioxide price of comparable size to those we've actually seen in real emissions trading systems is large enough to substantially affect both dispatch and shutdown decisions for existing coal plants
Read 20 tweets
3 Oct
This is a useful thread. I wanted to add a comment about the notion that "small prices don't work", to help people understand why even a modest carbon price will help drive change.
The key for determining what effect a price change will have on demand is the percentage change represented by that price change. This % is a function of the price of fuel and the carbon content of the fuel, to first order.
For industrial and utility applications (and also perhaps jet fuel) the fuel price per unit of energy content is relatively low and the carbon content relatively high (for coal especially) compared to consumer applications.
Read 7 tweets
29 Sep
This is a nice example of how speed of computation is a function of ALGORITHMS. More efficient algorithms make computation faster. It's not just about hardware (e.g. Moore's law) and in fact we will come to rely more on algorithms to speed things up as we approach physical limits
Leiserson, C E., N C. Thompson, J S. Emer, B C. Kuszmaul, B W. Lampson, D Sanchez, and T B. Schardl. 2020. "There’s plenty of room at the Top: What will drive computer performance after Moore’s law?" Science. vol. 368, no. 6495. pp. eaam9744. [science.sciencemag.org/content/368/64…]
There's a field called "codesign", in which software and hardware are optimized together to make certain calculations faster.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!