If you are reading about USPS "delivery scans" today, please understand that the USPS does not scan First Class letters (mail in ballots) like they do packages. The final scan on a piece of mail does not mean it was delivered, nor does a missing scan mean it wasn't delivered. 1/
What that data shows is a destination scan and here's how that works. In a simple world, letters and flats processed through two methods - on the big machines and not on the big machines. You know, you read all about those big machines this summer and fall as they are being /2
dismantled and such. When mail is processed on a big machine, it has origin and destination scans. The origin scan is the first time it is processed on the sorting machine and its barcode is scanned. The destination scan is the last time it is scanned on a big machine. This 3/
does not mean the mail was or was not delivered. Lets use Minnesota as an example. I mail my absentee ballot in Duluth, Minnesota. The mail carrier picks that ballot up and takes it to the local post office. From there, the ballot goes to a processing facility near Duluth 4/
and run through a big-ass sorting machine at which point it is scanned (origin scan) and sorted to go with a bunch of other mail on a truck headed to Eagan, Minnesota where the Twin Cities sorting facility is located. Election mail is usually segregated from gen pop and marked 5/
as such. Once it gets to the SCF (Sectional Sort Facility), it's then run through another big-ass machine where it gets its destination (not delivery) scan and sorted to the level which takes it to where absentee ballots to be delivered. This does, however, guarantee it was 6/
delivered. In the real world, absentee ballots in Duluth aren't sent to the Saint Paul, but the example works. So is it possible ballots didn't receive a destination scan but were delivered? Yes, if they were already segregated at the facility it's quite possible. Would that 7/
be the smartest thing to do during an election with the highest mail in voter turnout in history? Absolutely not--especially not with a court order to get those ballots delivered. All these words are to point out that just because something got a destination scan does not 8/
mean a guarantee it was delivered. It just means it was scanned at the last large processing plant it was routed to go to. 9/
Stupid typos This does NOT

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joel Ingersoll 🥌

Joel Ingersoll 🥌 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FlyoverJoel

6 Nov
instance, that doesn't appear to be what's happening. This seems more like a skip tracing usage, which is not allowed. For elections, I could technically use NCOALink as an election official (and we did this) to identify people who have moved and A) not mail to people who moved
out of state and NOT mail to them or B) Mail to people who moved in-state to tell them how to re-register or change something. As a third party law firm, I CANNOT use the system to find people who filed a change of address and still voted. That's not allowed. If violating that
the licensee could have their license suspended or terminated-licenses can run from 20K to 200K annually and there can be criminal penalties as well. Data Marketing firms and mail houses take this requirement VERY seriously because violating the PAF can basically close their
Read 5 tweets
5 Oct 17
1. I know we’ve got a lot of important things to talk about in the world right now, but I have to get something off my chest.
2. You need to stop putting green things in your deviled eggs. I mean it.
3. Those glorious little cholesterol bombs shouldn’t be tainted by something that’s fake healthy.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!