Still some law firm partners joining webinars as innovation experts even though their experience is really on advising tech clients, not instilling change in a law firm. It’s GREAT when they do u/s these things and can combine their legal skillset with product/change/etc skills
Also it’s fine if they don’t have those skills, everyone should still speak up about their thoughts. My issue is more acting as if they are experts on everything and not having an understanding of the real issues at play (and not knowing they don’t have that understanding)
It’s always very obvious when this is the case...ppl think innovation is “telling IT to give me access to Google Docs”, talking as if tool = innovation, and not even mentioning the underlying business model of #biglaw firms
Attended a webinar last week w/ a partner who was all over the incentives of lawyers to change, u/s where the low hanging fruit was, open on the challenges, talked about business models, clear on how to innovate w/out dumping tools on users. One of the best webinars this year
Sorry for the rant. I am by no means saying all law firm partners are like this, nor am I saying law firm partners shouldn’t have a voice. Just think there can be an unknown skills and knowledge gap (I am the first to admit I didn’t realise this when I was a lawyer)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jack Shepherd

Jack Shepherd Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jackwshepherd

6 Nov
1. Innovation is not all about you using Google Docs instead of Word, or Slack instead of email

2. Even if it was, getting Google Docs or Slack is not the hard part. Unearthing long-standing processes and adapting them to fit with those new tools is the hard part
3. Innovation is about looking way beyond "tools" and thinking about how you can be a better business regardless of snazzy tools

4. So the first step is to think of "how can we be a better business?". More profit? Better culture? Probably lots of things. Name them. Discuss them.
5. Then you ask, "how can we achieve a business goal, and how will we measure it?". Then go on a hunt and find pockets of the business where you can start doing stuff

6. You'll find out LOADS AND LOADS as you start doing stuff. Doing stuff is the best way to find out things
Read 10 tweets
9 Aug
I hope that at some point in the future, we "componentize" legal documents. What I mean is: move from one huge document to lots of smaller documents that collectively make up the document. I've had a fun day playing around with this in @obsdmd
I firmly believe that we won't (and probably shouldn't) be switching away from Word anytime soon. I also believe lawyers need to use Word properly before more sophisticated tools are developed. My opinion: for complex contracts, lawyers do not want anything other than Word
But in the midst of a heat wave on a Sunday afternoon, that doesn't stop me wondering what the future could hold...
Read 16 tweets
5 Aug
Had some interesting discussions this week on things lawyers often miss when using Microsoft Word. Here are some things I think are pretty important that most people don’t know about
This is probably teaching the legal tech community to suck eggs. But just want to make the point that the reaction I usually get when I tell people about these is, “oh wow that’s clever”. That’s where most are at
1️⃣ Split window view. You can have two windows open for the same doc and scroll them independently. Definitions (start of doc) on the left, clauses etc on the right (middle of doc). Means you don’t flick back and forth all the time
Read 9 tweets
24 Jul
It’s been an interesting few months for e-signatures in law. Just my opinion: none of the platforms are yet in a place where they really cater well “out of the box” for transaction signing processes run by law firms. Anybody looking at this area I welcome your thoughts
1️⃣ First and foremost, a signing process is a mission critical thing for lawyers. Once we trigger the signing process, things become pretty urgent and people get scared. Responses need to be snappy where people are having technical issues
2️⃣ Many transactions involve 100s of signatories in different time zones. Often documents need to be executed at a specific time. We can’t wait to trigger the process until the document is fully ready. People need to get signatures in advance + delegate authority to release
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!