The Senate’s decision to have a trial without witnesses or evidence is disappointing. We’ve never removed an impeached president before, and this new hurdle created by the Senate— whether to actually hear the entire case— will only make future removal from office less likely.
Much more concerning is that the Senate has effectively endorsed the Dershowitz standard— that nothing an American president does to get re-elected is impeachable, as long as he thinks his re-election is in the national interest.
This new precedent for impeachment is scary.
Under the Dershowitz standard, a president could trade America’s nuclear launch codes or betray American troops on the battlefield in exchange for foreign help with re-election.
A president could refuse to release federal disaster aid to a state unless its governor endorses him.
It's interesting that school bussing as a means to integrate schools is topical again.
I was a white student bussed to a predominantly Hispanic and black school in the 1970s.
Here's my take.
First of all, it's difficult to remember now how divisive this issue was among whites back then.
Parents who wanted their kids to go to the best schools possible moved to neighborhoods which were not coincidentally all-white, only to be told their kids would be sent across town
Many whites were upset that bussing denied them the opportunity to send their kids to the best schools in the exclusive garden-community suburbs where they lived.
Obviously, minority students living in less desirable neighborhoods lacked that opportunity as well.
You know, the thing that really gripes me the most about Barr's behavior doesn't have a lot to do with Donald Trump.
I mean, it does, circumstantially, but as bad as Trump's grifting and lying is, Barr's performance as AG has been so much worse.
Let me explain this, or try to.
It's hard to remember, now, but committed Republicans weren't always firmly in Donald Trump's camp.
Back on November 9, 2016, as the presidential election returns came trickling in, not one of my Republican friends or family members was enthused about a Trump presidency.
I mean, sure, they all voted for the guy, but for them it was more about NOT making HRC president than a burning desire to see Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
They saw his faults
They knew what he was.
They thought it was awful that they felt like he was their only option.
Okay, here's my thread on Brennan having his security clearance stripped, offered because I'm seeing a lot of Twitter experts expressing profoundly ignorant opinions about national security issues.
First, though, a disclaimer: I haven't held a security clearance in years, and my own clearance was strictly low-level. I'm not passing myself off as an expert here, but I am at least informed.
First, "He doesn't need a clearance," or, "He hasn't held a government job in years." Here's why that argument is so off. The clearance follows the person, not the job.
I turned fifty in October, and I'm just starting to realize all of the ways that being an abused child has molded and shaped me over the years. This thread will be a work in progress, that I can add to over an extended period.
I remember having happy childhood moments, mostly reading and playing with other kids; during the abuse itself, I experienced sheer terror. The rest of my childhood was a vague sense of dread-- waiting for more physical abuse.
When parents punish their children for misbehaving, the kids learn not to do whatever it was that got them into trouble. Since the physical abuse that I endured always seemed to erupt out of nowhere, it broke down "the rules." I grew indifferent to being punished.