“This is an internal medicine didactic conference held in purgatory.”
You want to read a book that is so subtle in its acerbic analysis of treating populations as opposed to individual people. /1
Moving Mountains by @michelaccad is cleverly written as a dialogue between Socrates and Geoffrey Rose, a father of population health medicine that is likely ruining your life as I type this. /2
I liked the book so much I read half of it out loud in the evening to my family. My excitement and enthusiasm overshadowed their lack of enthusiasm about the fallacies of public health. /3
This graph rivals the thrill of cancer mortality in the US graph as an invitation to rethink what you believe about disease, medicine, and public health influence on disease trends. /4
“The first duty of government in health promotion and environmental regulation is to protect the individual’s freedom of choice.
Every attempt to change our affairs for the better must of necessity impinge on that freedom because the aim is to influence what people do”. /5
This isn’t Kafka. This is Geoffrey Rose who as Illich would say will “bomb you for your own good”. /6
“Population medicine is not only a utopian endeavor but a potentially dystopian one if it employs unjust means to pursue its ends.” @michelaccad
Do we see this unfold in front of us during the times of Covid? /7
According to @michelaccad manipulation of population characteristics according to what public health experts imagine desirable “amounts to a confused hodge-podge of propositions that are untenable on clinical, epidemiological, social, and ethical grounds - or common sense” /8
Good part of the book focuses on specific issue of blood pressure and public health creeping into medicine that used to be about a doctor treating this person not applying population data to this person who may have nothing in common with population data. /9
Be on the lookout for Aristotle Solves the Conundrum of Hypertension by same author Michel Accad. /10
When I first ordered the book I was almost disappointed at the unclear name of the book. Now I am equally appreciative of how clever the title is to describe the process of moving statistical mountain curves of population characteristics. /11
Fun trivia. One reference was to Time cover magazine. I couldn’t believe it was 2014! I remember that cover well because I found it on my kitchen table in the morning. It was strategically paced there to get me on my usual grumble monologue about experts. /12
Probably the biggest value of the book to me was not one but many challenges to some common “truths” that public health propagates and that I swallowed and accepted as “it makes sense”. Time to learn more. /13
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A year ago in the summer a local church held a talk by a former governor on science. I know little of churches but science holds a special place in my heart. Enough for me to venture out to this Lutheran church founded by first settlers 150 years ago. I was not disappointed. /1
Villagers (without torches and pitchforks) dutifully gathered to listen to a PowerPoint presentation of what seemed to be proof of God’s existence. /2
A former chemistry professor at one of country’s best liberal colleges was showing us pictures of dinosaurs and DNA strands for nothing screams science more than dinosaurs and a DNA strand. /3
What brought you to the hospital?
I can barely make out words of a woman in her late 70’s. She is weak. Doesn’t eat. She has a leaking feeding tube in her stomach to make up for her lack of appetite.
I hear a story of a pancreatic cyst removal. The lady asserts she’s cured /2
Judging by the fact her pancreas and spleen were taken out, she is probably in denial. Not uncommon to misunderstand medical communication. Her story makes no sense but I shut up, tell her I will review her records and come back to tell her what happened. /3
This story shows how little doctors understand what they are doing to their loved ones and how much suffering the elderly suffer due to contradictory demands of confused relatives regardless of education. /2
It’s a story of a very old man who should have died quickly and at peace at home. Yet his fate was to be saved. Saved he was into endless suffering. /3
Dissent is never easy. Two broad possibilities in traditional cultures: voluntarily exit from a tribe (exile or becoming a hermit) or voluntary adoption/acceptance of madness/craziness. Both practices tied to Eastern religions. /2
Fools for Christ/Holy fools/Blessed fools were people who pretended to be insane to expose the sins of the world.
Hermits went into seclusion to find God.
Both practices are ascetic and derive from the conflict of what one may find true colliding with reality around. /3
Eating is passive. You don’t want to be passive. First step - figure out what food is. Once you know what food is, hopefully you will refuse to eat garbage.
In case of bread - flour, water, salt, yeast. /1
My (maternal) Grandmother ate bread with each meal, a small half piece of a slice. Upon seeing her eat bread with pasta my father would lament “Mom, you are eating bread with bread”. Grandmother remained unperturbed. /2
For Russians and Ukrainians bread is holy. You don’t throw it on the ground. Bread is the staff of life (Russian literal head of everything). /3