I think @realDonaldTrump and @SWAtlasHoover were committed to a policy with no scientific basis and would have dragged the country there regardless. But GBD provided a veneer of respectability for this deliberate subversion of public health
The GBD is an extreme fringe view repudiated by a dozen public health organizations apha.org/news-and-media… and....
And by @NIAIDNews director Dr. Anthony Fauci who calls it total nonsense nytimes.com/2020/10/19/hea…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marc Lipsitch

Marc Lipsitch Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mlipsitch

7 Nov
The @aier, the Libertarian think tank on an estate in Massachusetts that offered @MartinKulldorff @SunetraGupta and Jay Bhattacharya a comfy country retreat to write the Great Barrington Declaration clearly states the contents of same:
It advocates MAXIMIZING infection among the allegedly low-risk. aier.org/article/lockdo…. They should ask for their money back from Dr. Bhattacharya who argued today that it recommends trying to slow the spread. It advocates trying to speed it, as is clear from GBD's text.
This is just simply saying one thing when trying to influence policy and the opposite when trying to deflect criticism from scientists.
Read 9 tweets
19 Oct
This thread by @AlexBerenson distorts my work in a way that can only be willful, given that others have made the same arguments in the past on twitter and I have clearly refuted them. threadreaderapp.com/thread/1318176…
He takes a commentary I wrote with @ted_h_cohen about Listeria -- a bacterial disease we get typically from food -- that suggested (citing another paper -- this was not original research) that a lack of herd immunity to listeria could be leading to increased case numbers.
(of symptomatic Listeria infection). It also mentioned the idea that rubella vaccines used in the wrong way could increase severe (congenital) rubella through modest amounts of herd immunity that delay but do not prevent infection, increasing its incidence in pregnant women.
Read 12 tweets
6 Oct
This is just crazy. Mainstream experts have been trying to get through with almost no success. But take an out-there position and you get access. Of course take extra precautions for the most vulnerable. But don't relax everything else before evidence these precautions work.
The argument is incoherent if you don't do low-cost low-inconvenience things like universal masking. Surely any rational strategy uses low-downside strategies to reduce transmission in the whole population while shielding the vulnerable.
Two of these scientists, @SunetraGupta and @MartinKulldorff, have long been my friends. But I think they are dead wrong without a demonstrated plan for how such shielding would work. There is no good example in a dense western country.
Read 8 tweets
28 Sep
New chart reveals military’s vast involvement in Operation Warp Speed. Fascinating article. statnews.com/2020/09/28/ope…
Don’t quite understand how source thinks “foot on the neck to make them go go go” is ok to say in 2020 or even, insensitivity aside, makes sense.
Also don’t know how @HHSGov Spox Mango can say with certainty what the vax trial results will be when they are still not unblinded. Every time someone corporate or govt says something like that they should be asked how they know.
Read 4 tweets
31 Aug
This is simply wrong. washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…. Herd immunity is not a strategy or a solution. It is surrender to a preventable virus.
A much better take from @ScottGottliebMD here wsj.com/articles/swede…
Truly amazing how much bad but policy-impactful advice has come from nonexperts @Stanford. Who says academics don't matter?
Read 7 tweets
2 Aug
usually agree with both @StevenSalzberg1 and @nataliexdean. In this case agree with the cautious view. Even if safety were known (which I don’t think it is for this) RCT r really important for efficacy. Alternatives, which both @nataliexdean & I work on, are full of pitfalls.
The article by @StevenSalzberg1 just gets some things wrong. Published test of eg the Oxford vaccine had 126 and 253 vaccinated, enough to detect adverse events if occur in 2.3% and 1.4% respectively.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!