I've been spending a lot of time in hospital here in Bashur and am struck by two things that I had noticed among my own friends and family that are apparently turning into the norm here:
Women choosing to not breastfeed and women choosing to schedule C-sections before their ED's
Normally, I would shut up and remind myself to shut up about women's health issues since, of course, I am not a woman.
However, I believe in this case, the pressure to do both of these things comes from the expectations of men.
Myths and ideas about what happens to women's bodies as a natural part of child birth and feeding children have turned from something that is miraculous in itself into a perceived negative with women being urged to avoid "destroying" their bodies.
I have heard the conversations themselves from men and women talking about the value of both of these things regarding the sexual worth of women.
In terms of women's and children's health, putting the sexual gratification of men before anything revolts me.
Conversations about women's health here are close to non-existent in the public sphere, but man is it upsetting hearing some of the justifications for some of the things that are becoming the norm.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I found the account @ErasingWomen recently and I was stunned both that it existed and the extent of the issue it is covering.
The account is dedicated to highlighting the corporate erasure of the term "women", instead replaced by anatomical or fad terms.
As a man, I don't really find my male identity being targeted a lot. No one has ever referred to me as a "testicle haver" or "penis owner" or other mildly amusing terms and expecting me to accept these new terms out of a sense of solidarity with someone who is offended by "man".
On the other hand, women do seem to be battling with their identity bot being apparent but open to debate. They can, in all seriousness, be called "vulva people" or "ovary havers" or even "birthers" in even governmental service announcements.
What is fascinating is both sides actually say this often. "After peace, we have to live together" or some variation thereof, yet both also deny the right of the other to exist calling Azeri mosques "Persian" or Armenian churches "Caucasian Albanian" etc.
The dynamic created in modern ethnic conflicts, and very evident in the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict, is that of revisionist history turned into unwavering national narrative to which modern identities are formed.
Each side grotesquely mischaracterise the other and both sides are unwavering in narrative.
Unlike Germany or Italy during WW2, where military dictatorships had seized power, consecutive Armenian/Azeri governments have promoted these stories.
Ett någorlunda akademiskt perspektiv på den här tråden:
Enligt flera forskare som studerar socialpsykologi så finns det både rimliga och rationella anledningar till varför etniska svenskar kan känna sig obekväma eller rent sagt hotade av saker som hijab eller böneutrop.
Enligt Social Identity Theory (tillämpat till etniska grupper av Mummendey et al) så kan olika grupper anse varandra som 'normativa' så länge de anser att den andra gruppen beter sig på ett sätt som överensstämmer med en tänkt överordnad identitet.
Dvs en norrländing och en skåning till exempel kan förstå att de tillhör två olika grupper, fast båda är normativa inom grupperingen 'svensk' som är den överordnade gruppen i det här sammanhanget.
I just wanted to add to the growing chorus and remind people that none of these refugees are from Afrin.
You cannot just be given sombody's house by another country's occupation army. This is an openly stated goal which amounts to a war crime.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @TurkishMinuteTM view original on Twitter
Turkey, for its part, has not been silent on the goal of changing the demographics of the region.
Erdogan himself stated he would "return Afrin to its rightful owners" and expell a percentage of the Kurds he deemed came later.
Afrin is the one contiguously Kurdish populated area im Syria. It is the only area with an overwhelming Kurdish majority and no attempt by the central government at any time to change that demographic reality.