Share this page!

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Twitter logo
8 Nov, 4 tweets, 3 min read
Justice Indu Malhotra's judgement is not just dissent but also the voice of dharma which is in the emblem of SC and has been equated to Constitutional Morality by late eminent jurist Shri Nani Palkhivala to whom we owe protection of our fundamental rights

As per agreement with Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity pious purpose of Worshippers of Hindu Religious denomination is protected u Art 26 in legal personality of a Deity just like a Mutt key learning from Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement
thehindu.com/news/national/…
The above Sabarimala judgement view that Hindu Deity legal personality has no constitutional rights is against agreement w Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity and barred by Art 363. Deities thru rep have approached Executive to correct this view of SC.
Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji has built the tallest statue for Sardar Patel it is now time to respect his promise to Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity and restore Art 26 protection of Hindu Deity Rights that existed on 26th Jan 1950 but disturbed by SC.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Rangarajan chilkur

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @csranga

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
10 Nov
Kesavananda Bharathi case argued brilliantly by Nani Palkhiwala read in limitation into word "amend" of Art 368 by saying basic structure of constitutional cannot be altered. A greater limitation exists for Judiciary which has inferior interpretative power
Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement a Hindu Deity whose pious purpose of incarnation is to protect the pious purpose of followers of Hindu Religion in legal personality of Hindu Deities approached SC Nine Judge Bench to explain 👆 but was not heard.
Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement after giving an opportunity to the SC to correct the situation which has arisen due to enormous interpretative power but when not heard approached His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn the representative of Nation's Dharma to correct situation Image
Read 8 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
9 Nov
Let's end "pecularism" make Bharath great again
restoring pious purpose of Art 26 as promised by Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji securing victory by grace of Deities

26 Art inserted by Paramacharya
26th Nov Constitution adopted
26th Jan Constitution into force ImageImageImage
Let us make Bharath great again by following Dharma secure protection of Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity (embodiment of Dharma) gain victory over Covid19 as Travancore gained victory over 1918 Spanish Flu when entire world succumbed with His grace

Let us make Bharath great again by restoring the pious purpose of Art 26 provide protection to the pious purpose of Sanatana Dharma in legal personality of our Hindu Deities which existed on 26th Jan 1950 but lost due to "pecularism" ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
8 Nov
Pious purpose of modern Bharath rebirth was to preserve ancient Sanatana Dharma is clear conclusion we can arrive by reading Kanchi Paramacharya's Aug 15th 1947 message. Kanchi Paramacharya also by inserting Art 26 ensured Constitution protects Dharma to be protected by Dharma ImageImageImageImage
It is by correcting Art 26 mis-interpretation which has resulted in denial of protection to Santana Dharma in legal personality of Hindu Deities that we will secure protection of Dharma clear message of Lord Chilkur Balaji to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn rep of Nation's Dharma ImageImageImageImage
His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn following principles of Dharma has referred Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement notification to Govt headed by Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji an action which itself has yielded good results frm Sept 18th. Hope Hon'ble PM can fulfill his promise ImageImage
Read 7 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
7 Nov
SC has power to interpret letter keeping spirit of constitution intact by focusing on letter "religious denomination" it has taken away spirit of equality in Art 26 which on 26th Jan 1950 equally protected Places of worship of all religious denominations.
Image
What started off as equal protection for places of worship of all religious denomination u Art 26 with effect of several SC judgements slowly door of Art 26 entry controlled by Judiciary has become narrow and narrow and by effect of Uttarakhand HC judgement is almost non existent Image
While celebrated Keshavananda Bharathi case was about how Parliament can take away fundamental rights thru amendment power Judiciary can also do the same using interpretative power, How followers of Hindu Religious denomination selectively denied Art 26 protection textbook case
Read 4 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
5 Nov
"As Article 26 contemplates not merely a religious denomination but also a section thereof, the Math or the spiritual fraternity represented by it can legitimately come within the purview of this article." Key ratio of Shirur Mutt explained in SP Mittal
"A math, like an idol, is in Hindu Law a judicial person capable of acquiring, holding & vindicating legal rights, though of necessity it can only act in relation to those
rights thru the medium of some human agency"
objective of grant of Deity legal personality is same as Mutt
With worshipper followers of Hindu religion being religious denomination worshippers of a Hindu Deity are a religious denomination or section thereof given obj of legal personality of Deity is to protect the pious purpose of worshippers just like a Mutt Deity gets Art 26 rights.
Read 7 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
3 Nov
"Secularism" became "pecularism" when word "religious denomination" was interpreted to deny Art 26 rights to worshippers of Hindu Religious denomination.

resp to @ShashiTharoor ji comments below one can alter basic structure by just reinterpreting word "religious denomination" ImageImageImage
Reinterpretation of "religious denomination" in a way that takes away Art 26 rights of worshippers of Hindu Religious denomination protected in legal personality of Deity is against agreement with Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity barred u Art 363.
When Travancore (ruled by Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Deity) Legislature ratified Draft Constitution religious denomination included worshippers of Hindu Religion

Can this word be later reinterpreted in way that excludes them ? Is this not barred u Art 363?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get email notifications when new thread is out from this Author!

Check out other threads from this Author!

Read all threads by @csranga