Okay, I’ve got a couple of election-aftermath takes I want to share.

Each of these ought to be a column, but 👏parenting 👏 in 👏a👏pandemic👏is👏exhausting.

(1/who knows?)
First, I know everyone is mad at Nate Silver and the pollsters. I agree that we’ve probably gotten a little too into modeling and polling aggregation.

BUT!

The rise of Nate Silver was a response to endless utter-vacuous-bullshit punditry.
(2/x)
There is a news hole to be filled. In the epic-long campaign, there’s demand for some expert commentary on where things stand. Sites like 538 aren’t perfect, but they’re so much better than the alternative.
(3/x)
If 538 disappeared tomorrow, it would leave a vacuum. You know what would replace it?

More Chris Cillizza. More David Brooks and Bret Stephens. An endless sea of overconfident, underwhelming white dudes offering howlingly bad predictions.

(4/x)
Second take: the Lincoln Project.

I don’t think democratic dollars should go to moderate republicans, even if theyre VERY snarky moderate republicans.

Our dollars should go to (1) Stacey Abrams and (2) whoever else Stacey Abrams suggests.

BUT!

I’m kinda pro-Lincoln Project
The USA is designed as a two-party system. I’d like to change that through a constitutional convention, but I’d also like a unicorn and a good night’s sleep. None of that is gonna happen anytime soon.

We need two responsible/responsive parties. We only have one.
(6/x)
In the short-term, the answer to the Republican Party abandoning any semblance of interest in responsible governance is for Dems to humiliate them at the polls.

In the medium term, the answer is Republicans doing better.
(7/x)
Maybe the Lincoln Project will just be a grift.

That would suck.

But maybe it becomes a space for Republicans counter-organizing within their own caucus and finally starting to fix their bullshit.

That would be very, very good.
(8/x)
And, in the meantime, if they’re gonna constantly pwn Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz for being empty vessels masquerading as leaders, I’ll bring some popcorn and happily watch.
(9/x)
But the real point is that Republicans are going to be the ones to reform the Republican Party. Not progressives.

And they need to get to work on that right away. Otherwise the system keeps not working even a little bit.
(10/x)
Last thought, on the “be civil/nice to Republican activists who have the sads now.”

No. Absolutely not.

We are governed both by laws and by norms. Republican leaders have broken BOTH with impunity for the past four years.
(11/x)
You handle the lawbreaking through lawsuits. You handle the norm-breaking through public shaming.

If norms are broken without consequence, they cease to have any force. It makes the norm-breaking okay. It makes it normal.
(12/x)
We hold them accountable not to be spiteful, but to be responsible.

It is our civic duty to stand firm behind our norms.

It is our civic duty to make clear that weaponizing the administrative state in support of authoritarianism was wrong, and has consequences.
(Fin)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with dave karpf

dave karpf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @davekarpf

10 Nov
A key dynamic over the next few weeks is the absence of any meaningful leadership or strategic direction within the Republican Party.

You have Trump - a tinfoil-hat autocrat at the top.
You have lickspittle cronies currying favor by promoting the latest harebrained scheme. (1)
And then you have a sea of elected officials, each deciding on their own what statement or action is most likely to improve their standing.

(In other words, what will get them on Hannity and juice their fundraising numbers?)

(2/x)
There’s no one positioned to say “here’s what’s best for the country,” or even “here’s what’s best for the party.”

The result is the race-to-the-bottom we’re currently watching.

(3/x)
Read 8 tweets
10 Oct
Okay, so everyone is dunking on this take. And I’m gonna dunk on it too. But from a sliiiiiightly different angle.

I think the Biden/Harris non-answer is basically fine. It’s also identical to the answer Leonhardt suggests they give instead.

(Short thread)
Trump and Republicans desperately want to make this election about something other than COVID.

(Self-plug: I wrote about this for @wired last week) wired.com/story/the-elec…

The reason they keep asking “is he gonna pack the court” is because they see a potential reframe.
When Biden says “I’m not going to answer the question because they’re just trying to change the subject” he is 100% correct.

Any answer will get stripped of context and nuance and played on a loop. That’s the whole purpose of pursuing an answer.
Read 9 tweets
28 Sep
I’m actually optimistic that this Trump taxes NYT story will *matter*, even in this #lolnothingmatters moment in history.

That’s not because some crucial subset of voters will read this and change their minds.

It’s because of how Trump will react.
(1/x)
Trump is already an undisciplined campaigner. Even on an average day, he is routinely his own worst enemy.

The thing he is best at is maintaining constant attention and repeatedly creating new distractions.

It’s a reality TV gimmick. It’s his one superpower.
(2/x)
When Trump flails—when he’s really wounded—he loses that superpower.

Instead of creating another news cycle that leaves us forgetting the previous one, he just intensifies and extends the one he’s stuck in.

He is not a man who is capable of strategically staying quiet.
(3/x)
Read 10 tweets
14 Sep
There’s a tension in election coverage that is going to become increasingly jarring in the weeks ahead.

We’re going to read stories about business-as-usual campaigning, alongside stories of structural voter disenfranchisement.

The two storylines don’t easily coexist. (Thread)
Here’s a business-as-usual example:

Florida is an important battleground state. Polls show a close race. Whose message is resonating/what strategic choices are the campaigns making/who will win?

It’s a genre of reporting that we’re all used to — horse race reporting.
But then there’s this alternate storyline:

The courts have just effectively barred 770,000 Florida citizens from voting. This is part of a multi-year disenfranchisement effort that FL Republicans launched after FL voted to restore voting rights for ex-felons.
Read 11 tweets
28 Aug
Here's what I think will matter from tonight's speech/this convention:

The premise of the RNC is that everything was going great, COVID has been a blip, but we're totally past it and back to fine now.

That's comforting to an audience that wants to believe it. But it's fleeting.
It's nine and a half weeks until the election. That's a really long time. Particularly now, when every week brings another disruptive horror.

Nine and a half weeks ago was June 16th. What news do you recall from June 16th? What has stuck with you that long?
Reality is the unavoidable problem for the Trump campaign.

They just spent four weeks utterly ignoring reality. I'm sure that felt nice for the supporters who tuned in -- it sure felt infuriating to us critics!

But, tomorrow, reality will start setting in again.
Read 7 tweets
25 Aug
My real takeaway from RNC night one is how much the program felt like a fan-service episode of a long-running tv show.

If you aren’t tuning into FNC every night, you don’t know who the McCloskys are, or what “cancel culture” is all about.
(1/2)
There was a moment in DJT jr’s speech where he mentioned Biden “supported TPP. Goodbye manufacturing jobs!”

Dude... normal people don’t know what that acronym stands for. The ones who do are already firmly for or against you.
(2/3)
And please don’t reply with “but... base mobilization!”

A political base-mobilizing message should resonate wider than a fan base-mobilizing message.

It has to. The Fox News audience isn’t large enough to win an election.

(3/4)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!