I RTed this thread by @mattsheffield yesterday because it contains crucial observations on conservative media.

However, I strongly disagree with the idea that Trump’s supporters are being "misled" and I don’t think "love can defeat hate" is a helpful motto. A few thoughts: 1/
To begin with, there is very little empirical evidence for the assertion that Trump’s supporters are simply being deceived by conservative elites. 2/
Considering that the question of what’s animated millions of Americans to stick with Trump has received more media and academic attention than any other topic over the past few years, that’s significant. 3/
So why are so many people clinging to this idea? The answer, I believe, has a lot to do with the pervasive myth of white innocence that has been so foundational throughout America’s history. 4/
It’s noteworthy that regardless of how racist/racially discriminatory the concrete outcomes of policies they support, and how overtly racist the programs and candidates they support, it must never be assumed that white people were actually animated by racism/racial resentment. 5/
It must never be assumed that they knew exactly who and what they were supporting, that they rallied behind such policies because they were the beneficiaries of racial stratification and therefore wished to uphold this particular social order. 6/
Instead, we have to go look for innocent explanations, explanations that portray white Americans as fundamentally decent and ultimately blameless for the very outcomes they pushed. 7/
And so we are told they were driven by sheer desperation, economic anxiety, by circumstances outside their own control, or deceived by sinister forces. 8/
This is also where much of the attractiveness of the “Trump the political genius” narrative stems from. Empirically, the idea that millions of people have simply been overwhelmed by the seductive powers of Donald Trump is not persuasive. 9/
But: If Trump is indeed a political genius, then how could we blame the American people for making him president? The Trumpists might be fools; but mostly, they were unlucky to have encountered such a brilliant demagogue. 10/
It is revealing that this type of apologist tale is readily believed by people who did not vote for Trump, as the desire to self-exculpate is felt not only by those who have actively supported the wannabe-autocrat, but also by those who have failed to prevent his rise. 11/
And so (mostly white) Americans from a broad political spectrum - including “Never Trump” conservatives and liberal Democrats – are buying into the narrative of Trump’s political genius, as it helps to justify their impotence. 12/
And then there’s the idea that "love can defeat hate," which, in the concrete context of American politics, as @C_Stroop rightfully points out, sounds like a recipe for taking a pass on holding anyone accountable - in the name of "unity." 13/
Moreover, this fails to acknowledge that there is real conflict, with real stakes. The two sides clash over what America is and should be: a white Christian nation, in which white Christian men are at the top, or a multi-racial democracy that abolishes patriarchal rule. 14/
That’s a real conflict, those are real stakes, there is real disagreement – not just a misunderstanding, something that can be solved by hugging it out. 15/
And while it might be true that some or many of Trump’s supporters feel disrespected, it’s weird to me to portray them as emotionally needy, like children who are throwing tantrums and just want to be cuddled. 16/
It is true that in a narrative in which conservative elites are misleading the people and Trump is a genius demagogue, Trump’s supporters are not stamped as "deplorables." But they are imagined as mere children following the Pied Piper. 17/
If we want to take them seriously as political actors, we need to acknowledge that most of them understand precisely who and what they were supporting – that their interests are aligned with the white grievance state Trump promised. 18/
Taking Trump’s supporters and enablers seriously shouldn’t just mean sanitizing their motivations – it means holding them responsible for the politicians and policies they choose to support. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Zimmer

Thomas Zimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tzimmer_history

1 Oct
I find this question, prompted by @SethCotlar’s criticism of what he rightfully calls the "naïve, American Exceptionalist idea that 'it can’t happen here'," really interesting. A few thoughts from a German perspective. 1/
I’m not necessarily an expert on this topic and have not been following the debate among German conservatives super closely (keeping up with what’s happening on the American side of the Atlantic keeps you pretty busy these days…). So these are really just a few thoughts. 2/
Interestingly, German post-war history has been shaped by almost the reverse exceptionalist idea: "It happened here, so it can always happen again, and it is our responsibility to make sure that it won’t, at least not here." 3/
Read 21 tweets
13 Aug
Conservatives claiming to be “confused” by the - honestly not all that complicated - idea that “race” is not a biological reality, but a social construct that has dramatically shaped the social, political, and cultural hierarchy in the U.S., is so very tiring and silly.
It’s always hard to discern how much of that stems from pure ignorance and how much is just bad-faith debate club nonsense. In any case, they honestly think their “confusion” is an indictment of the theories and ideas of race and racism they don’t like.
Of course, contrary to what conservatives want to pretend, this sort of “confusion” does not cast doubt on well established and empirically proven theories of - it simply reflects very poorly on those who are unable or unwilling to grasp and engage with them on an adequate level.
Read 4 tweets
8 Aug
To elaborate on this excellent point: America has always been dominated by one group - conservative white Christians. And a political system that threatened their privileged status - true democracy - has always been anathema to them.
What’s changed is that until recently, conservative white Christians were dominant in both parties, so they regarded both Republican and Democratic rule as legitimate.
That’s no longer the case though: Only one party, the GOP, has pledged to preserve and defend white conservative Christian rule by whatever means necessary, while the other is pursuing a more pluralistic, (small-d) democratic vision.
Read 4 tweets
3 Aug
As the state of Victoria in Australia has declared a “state of disaster” due to rising Covid infections, with the city of Melbourne even announcing a strict curfew, this article does a good job of explaining how much worse the situation in the U.S. is, compared to Australia. 1/
To build on that, let’s zoom in on a comparison between the state of Victoria and the state of Maryland – because I used to live in MD and have family in Victoria, and because they’re both similar in terms of population (6.6 million for Victoria, about 6 million for Maryland). 2/
On Sunday, Victoria registered 671 new infections – overall, they’re up to 12,000 confirmed cases and fewer than 150 deaths. Maryland, meanwhile, has been hovering around 1,000 new cases per day, and has seen over 90,000 cases and 3,500 deaths total. 3/
Read 5 tweets
1 Aug
Anybody who knows anything about U.S. history should understand that „Americans experienced more freedom to express themselves and fewer political constraints in the mid-1950s than today“ is a take that automatically disqualifies you from being taken seriously. The mid-1950s!
There are lots of interesting ways to approach data like that: Who are these „Americans“? What are the contexts in which they were asked these questions? How did the actual meaning of the questions and the answers change over time, depending on the specific context?
Instead, Yascha Mounk gives us the most superficial, most misleading of all interpretations. His naive belief in the timeless objectivity of social/survey data and his ignorance towards the need to qualify and historicize such raw numbers are truly special.
Read 7 tweets
28 Jul
I want to share my personal Covid-19 story, from my infection in March to the ongoing struggle with long-term effects, even four months later. Too many people are still unconcerned about the pandemic. Maybe hearing from those who had the disease can change that. #LongCovid 1/
I have been reluctant to talk about my Covid struggles on Twitter. But when I read this powerful thread by @ahandvanish, I decided I should describe what it’s been like since the infection. 2/
When I mention I had Covid, most people react surprised, shocked even. Here in Germany, at least, few have had any personal interaction with Covid patients, which contributes to the threat feeling abstract and removed. It’s understandable, but it’s a problem. 3/
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!