I'm a huge NKJ fan & like all of this. But I feel like it makes a common left mistake in focusing too much on the content of messaging & too little on the mechanisms. Right narratives stick not because they're more clever but because the right has a giant media machine!
The right's narratives are echoed throughout a vast apparatus from Fox to Breitbart to radio to Facebook to, now, local newspapers that have been bought by RW billionaires. The left simply has nothing like that! It mostly tries to jam its messages through the distorting filter...
... of mainstream journalism (which doesn't work). This is such a ubiquitous fact about US politics I feel we almost forget it, the way fish don't notice water. So much discussion of what Dems say, or should say, & so little attention ...
... to the fact that the left simply lacks the means to ensure that the things it says reach the target audiences. No amount of cleverness or good storytelling can overcome this imbalance, which is ultimately about *money & power*, not good words.
One thing makes messages stick: repetition. The right can ensure that every single con hears consistent, repeated messages, day after day. The left's messages, even if they start out coordinated & clever, get diffused & distorted before reaching voters' ears.
That was the substance of AOC's (widely misinterpreted) critique -- not that Dems need to all say socialism, but that Dems need to *run campaigns suited to the modern information environment*, which means more than TV ads & f'ing press conferences. It's an online war.
Anyway, I agree w/ @nkjemisin about the content of messaging, but let's not forget the other side of the coin: the left needs its own machine to carry messages to voters *where voters are*. That's what it lacks. Until that imbalance is fixed, no storytelling will be good enough.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a permission structure for cons to spend the next four years denying the legitimacy of Biden's presidency. (They would find some reason regardless, but this will do.) politico.com/news/2020/11/0…
All day today I have been having the vertiginously weird experience of trying to convince Democrats that the fact that the RW has a giant, coordinated messaging machine & they don't *matters*. To no effect! I can't even get people to acknowledge & discuss it.
And yet every single Dem, from center to left, is eager AF to discuss "messaging" & "framing." They'll all spend hours lingering over various word combinations, poring over focus group results, convince that just the right phrase is the key to the kingdom. Argh.
Politics is about money & power. Messaging is part of politics & therefore ALSO about money & power. The cleverness or stickiness or virality or whatever TF of individual phrases is not what wins messaging battles. Money & power win them.
Instead of "reaching out," why don't we take this opportunity to make very clear that racism, xenophobia, and authoritarianism are repugnant to a decent society. Let's reject them, loudly & publicly, & extend social disapprobation to those who support them.
When someone expresses racism, xenophobia, or authoritarianism in public, they SHOULD face backlash. We do not need sympathy for those facing such backlash -- that's things working as they should! Reserve your sympathy for racism's millions & millions of victims.
Oh, wait, what's that, your motivations for discrimination & hatred are "religious"? Yeah I don't care.
Not sure I can articulate this well, but it seems to me that the features of Trump's personality/psyche that enabled him to capture & hold the allegiance of the RW base are *incommensurate with competence*. His malignant narcissism makes him genuinely unaware ...
... of the norms & conventions he's violating. He just bulls through them with zero hesitation or self-awareness. That thrills the baying mob. But he things that make people smart & competent -- self-awareness, self-discipline, the ability to delay gratification -- are ...
... impossible to completely conceal. When a Hawley or Cotton violates the same conventions, they are *aware* of it. There's a purposefulness, an artifice, a wink that just doesn't sell as well. Much of what Trump "accomplished" he did so by simply not realizing ...
One thing about political analysis is that it relies almost entirely on counterfactuals which cannot be tested or refuted, so basically anyone can say any old shit they want despite the fact that no one actually knows anything.
"If Biden had talked about X more, he would have done better in Y states." I mean, sure. Or maybe not, maybe he would have done worse in Y states! Literally no one knows or could ever know.
"If Dems has talked less about race & abolishing the police, they would have done better in purple districts." Maybe!
"If Dems were bolder & less apologetic about their agenda, voters would respond positively." Maybe!
No one can or will ever know whether these are true.