What American "weakness" actually means and what people think it means. There is a great divergence here in definitions that is critical to understanding balance of power relations and Chinese perceptions of American vulnerability that I think Americans simply do not understand.
This is particularly notable when reading what the DC strategic circus has to say about the topic, whether from the left or right since there is actually marginal difference here. When some interchangeable think tank, journalists, or bureaucrat in the security services writes
about American weakness, they are actually primarily deploying it as a rhetorical weapon against domestic weakness, because what they are not actually analyzing is American capabilities, but rather the meta-coherence of the wide American propaganda network. When the DC blob
writes that Trump has weakened America, what this means is he has primarily made the normal signalling and concensus building within their group incoherent. He has introduced dissonance into their carefully crafted reality of events that is duly regurgitated out through media
He has in effect made their transparent lies a little too transparent. Like social taboos in polite society that should be maintained to reduce frictions, Liberalism demands certain taboos and little white lies as to how foreign politics works and exposing them is can be either
embarrassingly declasse or even dangerous. This isn't actually a weakness at all, because America fundamentally still maintains hegemonic control of the discourse before or after. Like the recent elections farce demonstrates, a simple but empty change in figureheads resets the
signal on strength/weakness, though of course the American right will now signal that Biden is "weakening" America. To the Leninist or at least someone outside the imperial bubble, this is all fundamentally theatrics, a play to entertain the voting plebes. Actual weakness is the
gradual decay in state capacity and institutional effectiveness, the loss of capabilities, social dysfunction, etc. The emblobbening of the American people and the deleterious impact that 40% obesity rates have across every sector of American society. The precipitous rise in
bastardry and single parenthood that have massive long term negative socio-economic effects. The transformation into a multi-racial majority-minority state. The dysfunction in military procurement as well as an increasingly racially stratified officer-enlisted military. There are
any number of similar metrics which point to a degenerating state-society, the most immediate of which is the US non-response to covid. Trump gets all the blame, but the institutional factors had set up America for failure no matter which figurehead was at the helm. These are
all actual weaknesses and all the more glaring because not only are they recognized as such, but the solution is not to fix them which would require energy the American state can no longer muster, but to use propaganda to turn them into strengths. Thus fat acceptance and anti-fat
shaming. Strong single women who don't need no man. Neverending immigration. Women, lgbtqwtfbbq celebrated for conducting drone strikes as empowerment.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Duke of Qin

Duke of Qin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @qin_duke

26 Oct
"Why aren't the Islamist head hoppers we have been cultivating for decades biting the targets we want anymore?!" cries the Anglo Imperialist.
The real answer is that China doesn't have troops occupying random Muslim nations nor does it gratuitously insult Muslims while simultaneously pandering to them. It's a simple thing called respect. You can kill a man, but to humiliate is even worse. Liberalisms inability to deal
with sectarianism or it's burdensome Muslim minorities arises from the fact it mistakes symbolism for action. It routinely insults and degrades Muslims because it is unable to truly rule them. Mohammed cartoons and similar stunts are puerile and serve no purpose beyond incitement
Read 5 tweets
25 Oct
Interesting 4D chess theory of Guo Wengui, Yan Limeng, etc being Chinese double agents to poison the well of American anti-China attitudes. I.e. to attach the movement to a hated and discredited domestic rival, Bannon/Trump which instinctively sets the elite opinion against it as
well as rolling out the most stupid and easily debunked theories so that further revelations is instinctively dismissed out of hand. This doesn't seem very plausible to me because 1) it is a very subtle influence operation and 2) anti-Party Chinese activists are that stupid and
dishonest as a rule. The party isn't good at this kind of subtle propaganda game and more critically isn't isn't particularly useful because the US propaganda game is much more powerful and can shift attitudes on a dime if desired so even if this was a Chinese plot, it is one
Read 4 tweets
19 Oct
This is either incredibly based or incredibly dishonest depending on whether you chose to believe it is true. The reality, like always is a little more complex. The party has publicly been encouraging intermarriages, via financial subsidies for newly married couples.
Inter ethnic marriages had been on a downward trend according to the 2010 census. Uighur-Han interrmarriages are only 1% of household (5% for Kazakh-Han marriages) which had been a substantial decline since 2000. This is emblematic of the attempt at social withdraw from the
wider Chinese state-society by Uighur society as a whole. The reaction by the Party can be seen as an expansion of the state to reabsorb them back into the mainstream, i.e. any attempt at social separatism won't be tolerated. The idea that you can just wander into Xinjiang and
Read 5 tweets
17 Oct
There is this perverse idea that the CCP is putting out anti-Western propaganda among DC China Watchers and their Journalist cum rags when it clearly isn't the case. Party propaganda is always about delivering positive messages about China and the Party itself, i.e. Coronavirus
contained, poverty declining, new so and so. It's intent is first and foremost to signal to the Chinese people the accomplishments of one party rule. Since policy debate is decided internally, there is no need for the entire media farce required in the West to gin up public
sentiment as media shills and policy pundits circle jerk one another to justify whatever. That bit of theater is simply superfluous in the Chinese political system. Thus Chinese media, rather than devious is mostly just staid. If the PRC were to adopt a stridently anti-Anglo push
Read 6 tweets
5 Oct
The map is a composite of age/weight profiles, prior undiagnosed exposure to similar coronavirus, and effective utilization of state capacity in order of significance. A failed check on all three gets you the American (continental) level of casualties.
Mainland SE Asia has the lowest casualties in spite of marginal governance because of no fatties, resistance from previous undiagnosed localized viral sweeps. East Asia, some resistance, but again fewer fatties, strong state capacity geared towards pandemic suppression.
Sub Saharan Africa has no fatties and the youngest demographic profile, so again marginal impact. The America's are the most distant and isolated population from the old world and likely more susceptible to old world diseases, also fatasses everywhere. Rest of the world pass/fail
Read 4 tweets
4 Oct
China's Muslims and Japan's Empire or Liberalism and minority policy; a book review of a sorts. One of the trends in Western China scholarship is what I would call Qing revisionism. New Qing studies is the origin of the term, but the purpose is actual widescale historical
revisionism away from Party historical orthodoxy and towards a "truer" version of history. The reasons for this are partly Western academic trends towards deconstruction, partly younger academics overturning their elders, and a small part quasi geopolitical attack to undermine
in their own small fashion state history and foster historical nihilism. The problem is of course is that the academics fail to comprehend the great utility of little white lies. Speaking of the book, it lays out the opportunistic collaboration of Chinese Muslims under Japanese
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!