[THREAD]: The New York Times and CNN have tried to debunk the fact that absentee ballots have been requested and returned on behalf of dead people in Michigan. They claim that the instance was a "run of the mill clerical error".
Are these more clerical errors?
Are these more clerical errors?
https://twitter.com/jacknicas/status/1324806270579318785
More "clerical errors" here?
Here's a list of ~10,000 people that are confirmed dead that have (for whatever reason) requested and returned absentee ballots in Michigan in the most recent election.
LIST: controlc.com/0e98b0bf
VOTER SITE: mvic.sos.state.mi.us/Voter/Index
Here's a list of ~10,000 people that are confirmed dead that have (for whatever reason) requested and returned absentee ballots in Michigan in the most recent election.
LIST: controlc.com/0e98b0bf
VOTER SITE: mvic.sos.state.mi.us/Voter/Index
CNN pretended to debunk this by saying they spot checked 50 names from a list of 14k they saw on Facebook (has since been deleted). This was NOT MY LIST. #fakefactcheck
MY LIST: controlc.com/0e98b0bf
MY LIST: controlc.com/0e98b0bf
This does not mean these votes were counted. They were hopefully rejected by the state. That being said, who is requesting and returning these absentee ballots, attempting to vote for the dead?
Maybe there's a reasonable explanation for all of this!
Maybe more "clerical errors"
Maybe there's a reasonable explanation for all of this!
Maybe more "clerical errors"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
