Alpha is not fund return – index return (excess returns over benchmark), that’s called active returns and not Alpha.

Alpha means excess returns over ‘minimum expected returns’ from the fund

(A thread) (1/n)
What is the minimum expected return from a fund?
Depends on the risk the fund is taking
a. If the fund is taking risk same as the index, minimum expected ME return from the fund is same as the Index.
b. Fund is taking risk higher than the index, ME is higher than the index (2/n)
(c) Fund is taking risk lower than the Index, ME is lower than the index

You should not look at only beating the index; you should look at beating the minimum expected return based on the risk the fund takes, which is Alpha. (3/n)
What is the risk we are talking about?

Risk here is defined as Beta. It’s a relationship of the funds risk to the risk of the benchmark. Benchmarks risk is generally considered as 1 (4/n)
How is the minimum expected return calculated?

Lets say risk free rate / investing in an FD is 5%, than when anyone is investing anywhere they will have a minimum expectation of 5% right? (5/n)
But will the expectation be 5% or more if the investment is happening in the stock markets? It will be more because she is going to take risk. So lets say her expectation is 5% + 7%, 5% for risk free and 7% for taking the risk. (6/n)
So if she invests in markets, her expectation is 12% (5 + 7). Now, the more the risk you take the more will be the expectation (7/n)
a. If the funds beta is same as index 1, the return expectation is same as index 12%.
b. If the fund is taking higher risk than the Index, say 2, the return expectation is twice. Here we can’t expect twice of risk free & hence we only expect twice of the risk related return 7%*2
(c) And if the fund is taking lower risk than the Index, say 0.5, the return expectation is half. Hence we can’t expect half of risk free and hence we only expect half of risk related return 7% * 0.5 (9/n)
Alpha is the difference between a fund's minimum expected returns and its actual returns.

Fund B inspite of generating same returns as the benchmark, is not a good fund as it delivered less than expected return of 19%. (10/n)
In Fund C, inspite of not beating the index, the funds Alpha is positive because of lower beta/risk the funds expected returns were lower and we still call it a good fund (11/12)
So it is advisable to look at the Alpha of the fund, which will tell you how much more or less returns the fund has generated v/s the minimum expected returns where the minimum expected returns are not the Index return. (END)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kirtan A Shah

Kirtan A Shah Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kirtan0810

30 Sep
(Thread) Understanding Real Estate Investment Trust (REITs) – This is for education purpose and the story is made up to simplify the concept, don’t take it at face value (1/n)
Lets say I am a RE developer, K Raheja. I like a land in Mumbai & Hyderabad 4 some commercial development. I decide to buy it. Where will I get the monies 2 buy & construct it?
(1) Self
(2) Bank, NBFC, MF - Debt
(3) Partner – someone else investing as Equity (2/n)
So I invest some monies, got some 4m banks & MF’s & I also got Blackrock to invest 2 buy the land & make the business park called Mindspace. I constructed around 23-mn sq ft with multiple building & I started leasing them out to companies who wanted rented office premises (3/n)
Read 12 tweets
13 Sep
Parag Parikh Long Term Equity fund will be introducing 'covered call strategy' in the fund. This can be a game changer for the fund in a market that does not steeply go up or moves up gradually or stays sideways or even falls (1/n)
Options is slightly difficult to explain over twitter, so here’s my video on ‘basics of options’, do subscribe to my channel ☺ (2/n)
How does a cover call work?
When a fund buys a stock, they expect it to go up. But they don’t make returns if the stock stays sideways or falls and is exactly where cover call comes into picture. Let me explain, (3/n)
Read 13 tweets
16 Jul
While there is some confusion around MFD & RIA, below is what i gather from the @fpstudycircle meeting today

(1) MF distributors cant charge fees and can only make monies through commissions (1/4)
(2) Individual RIAs (clients less than 150) cant make commission income and can only charge fees. Individual RIAs has to advice direct where ever there is available and commission products are allowed where ever direct not available like corporate FDs etc. (2/4)
(3) Corporate RIA entity can run both fee based & distribution. Depending on the clients requirements the entity can segregate the client 2 fee based or distribution services but cant make money through fees & distribution both 4m the same client. This is client level segregation
Read 4 tweets
2 Jun
There seems to be a fair bit of confusion amongst investors on what’s happening in arbitrage funds. Let me explain the arbitrage space and how it works with MFs. Not sure if it is simple enough but have tried (1/n)
Mutual Funds do cash future arbitrage. Assume a stock to be at 100 in cash market and 101 in futures market at the start of the month. Mutual Funds will buy stock in cash market at 100 and sell futures at 101 thereby locking a 1 Re profit. (2/n)
Last Thursday which is the expiry, the cash and future prices merge (that’s how it works), so irrespective of whatever the cash price is, the fund still makes 1 Re. (3/n)
Read 12 tweets
23 May
Here is exactly where Kotak's expertise (as an advisor) will be tested in Franklin's case. Franklin is stuck between revoking shares (e-voting could be an issue) or negotiating for larger recovery from Mr Subhash Chandra. (1/5)
HDFC has already taken a hit on its balance sheet and paid back investors in the Essel FMP case. (2/5)
Now the value of Essel's debt in Franklin's fund is 92 cr., if they sell the shares they might get slighly more than 92 cr. but the total due is 600+ cr. Should they sell shares or negotiate for larger recovery? Either ways the NAV will be better off. (3/5)
Read 5 tweets
14 May
What was the NBFC package all about and will it help MFs?

(1) 30,000 cr will be infused. So any bank who wants to buy NBFC/HFC/MFIs debt paper from the secondary market (mainly from MFs) can buy it and the guarantee will be given by the government (1/n)
so if after having bought the paper if the institution defaults, government will pay. This is only for Investment grade paper (BBB- and above). This is definitely a big plus for MF. The FT schemes that got shut have 40% exposure to the above sector. (2/n)
(2) The same 30,000 cr above can also be used to subscribe for primary (new) issues/fund raising by the financial institutions. (3/n)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!