Breaking news: Competition Commission of India has ordered an investigation into dominance by @GoogleIndia , especially looking into @GooglePayIndia .

This follows a major pushback by Indian founders against the 30% "tax" by Google on Indian companies.

A thread by @nixxin
1/
The CCI investigation will look into 4 aspects of dominance by Google:
1. Exclusivity Regarding Mode of Payment for Purchase of Apps and In-App
Purchases (IAPS).
This is a major issue, because the Google Play store is imposing Google's payment gateway on apps, and then
2/
taking a 30% commission from all apps. This was the issue that got Indian founders to push back against Google earlier last month. the allegation that the CCI cites is a "take it or leave it" condition for all app developers.

3/
It's alleged that Google is using its market power and control over android to extract a 30% fee.

4/
Another interesting bit: the 30% Google tax will increase cost for google's competitors. Google's vertical integration (Play books, play movies, YouTube music) etc.

5/n
More vertical integration issues being questioned: Google having data on competing apps
6/n
This is where the @GooglePayIndia bit comes in: the allegation is that Google encourages preinstalls of Google Pay and OEMs have no choice but to agree to terms imposed by Google. Google has said in response that these are separate agreements
7/n
3. Big one: [Play Store] Search manipulation and bias by Google in favour of Google Pay. That even when users search for Pay on the Play Store, the first result is invariably Google Pay, and not Paytm or Phonepe.

8/
4. Prominent placement of Google Pay on the Play Store. That Google has rigged it's "User Choice" and "Editor's choice" and "Top free apps" lists to favour @GooglePayIndia

9/
And that Google Pay is being promoted on google search for recharges and bill payments.

10/
5. That Google prioritises Google Pay ad on the play store everytime someone searches for Paytm or Phonepe.

Reminder: this is similar to the Bharatmatrimony case that is in the Supreme Court (since 2012)

11/
So these are all the key issues being considered here. Some of these issues has been raised earlier by Indian founders. For more content, please do watch my chat with @MitaliLive on YouTube:
Just to clarify: point #5 , about search advertising manipulation, is not being investigated by the CCI in this investigation.
I just did a search for "pay" on the play store. First result: Google pay. The ad is also google (from one pocket to another, so no cost?). This the allegation in CCI complaint too. Prioritisation of Google pay by Google.
And for "Payments"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with MediaNama.com

MediaNama.com Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @medianama

11 Nov
THREAD: The strange situation of India's Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) looking to regulate content on online streaming services like Netflix, Hotstar, Amazon Prime Video, Sony LIV etc. We've been tracking this since early 2018.

Some context from @nixxin:

1/
1. In an unexpected move (it has been rumoured for over a year), amendments in the allocation of business rules have given MIB jurisdiction over regulation of online streaming services. medianama.com/2020/11/223-ib…

2/
2. Why is this strange? Firstly, bec streaming services are not like cable TV. It's not broadcast. When you choose a show/video, you pull content. It is private viewing. What separates a streaming service like Hotstar from Porn? The content, of course, but nothing structurally
3/
Read 23 tweets
31 Aug
#Thread: The Indian government on Aug 27 released a data management policy for National Digital Health Mission. The policy is a framework for how data with the mission, by hospitals, health companies, startups, etc, will be governed. #DigitalHealth 1/n medianama.com/2020/08/223-na…
The government has given only ONE WEEK for the public to respond to and give their inputs on the policy. It’s a blatant deadline and goes against the spirit of consultative policy making. 2/n medianama.com/2020/08/223-na…
A week is not enough for civil society to respond to concerns, or for businesses to weigh cost-benefit. In fact, it violates the govt’s own Pre-Legislative Consultative Policy, which requires a 30-day consultation period for policies released by govt ministries/departments: 3/n
Read 20 tweets
4 Jun
We will be live-tweeting the roundtable on Algorithmic Accountability in India, hosted by Divij Joshi
@divijualsuspect. You can also tune into the livestream on our YouTube channel:
.@divijualsuspect said today's discussion is on what algorithms imply for our lives and for our democracy.
Implementation and use of AI varies across states. Second, the private sector is involved in all govt projects around AI. For instance, Punjab's AI system is being developed by a Gurgaon firm.

@BasuArindrajit of @cis_india
Read 42 tweets
2 May
Mega thread on #AarogyaSetu 👇

1/n The Indian government has made Aarogya Setu contact tracing app mandatory for all employees (public & private) +for people living in Containment Zones. Failure to download it might violate MHA guidelines
medianama.com/2020/05/223-co… +
2/n Even if you aren't in a situation where #AarogyaSetu is mandatory, govt has authorised state govts/local authorities to make guidelines more restrictive. CISF is already mulling making the app mandatory for passengers at airports and metro stations.
medianama.com/2020/04/223-ci…
3/n Even before the government mandated the use of #AarogyaSetu, Prasar Bharti, Central Armed Police Forces, Zomato and Urban Company directed employees/contract workers to download the app.
medianama.com/2020/04/223-zo…
Read 19 tweets
6 Mar
Long thread (from @nixxin )
Yesterday, I was on a business news channel, ET Now to discuss the Indian govts regulation of social media platforms. The govt held a meeting with platforms to push for takedown of fake news/misinfo. They're particularly unhappy with Twitters delays.
One of the panelists, Vinit Goenka, made three suggestions:
1. There needs to be a KYC mechanism for users of social media. Just like banks have
2. Servers need to be kept in India (he makes this demand on every panel) Social media platforms need to pay taxes in India
3. Social Media co's need to be held accountable for user content. Just like TV channels are platforms and are held accountable what is said on TV or newspapers for what is published.

Before I address his points, a few things.
Read 17 tweets
9 Jan
"What could be critical personal data that would require mandatory localisation? It'd most probably be in relation to national security. But wouldn't the govt already have it?" #NAMA #PDPBill2019
"It's important that we have explicit consent, but there are so many situations where we can't give explicit consent. Like my RFID number plates being read at a traffic jam." #NAMA #PDPBill2019
"What explicit consent from a user would mean is have a pretty picture showing how data flows across the world, and you click yes or no." #NAMA #PDPBill2019
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!