"Whatever Happened To The Lakefront Liberals? The 2020 Election In Maps."
Tl;dr — they're still liberal, unless it has to do with wealth inequality or criminal justice reform...
Let's start by looking at the results for Joe Biden, who won 86% citywide. Broke 90% across the majority-Black South and West sides, cleared 80% most everywhere, only lost in a few of the most conservative corners of the city (Dunning, Midway, Mt Greenwood)
Two other races: the Fair Tax (71% citywide) and Kim Foxx (64%).
Interesting comparisons here: Fair Tax was >90% almost nowhere. Kim broke 90% across the South Side, but lost in wider swaths of the North and Northwest Side.
Also notice the lakefront lighting up red... uh-oh.
I was curious: where was the pro-Biden / anti-Foxx / anti-Fair Tax voter?
The don't-tax-the-rich, anti-criminal justice reform Democrat?
You guessed it: downtown, River North, Lincoln Park.
Louder for the people in the back. This is a map of people who said "Yes I want a Democratic president, but hell no you're not gonna raise taxes on the rich."
I think some would call them "the libs"
Let's zoom in. The conservative 39th Ward. (Sauganash, North Park, etc.)
No huge surprises here: Biden, Foxx, and Fair Tax all way below their citywide average. Fair Tax carried nicely in the ward's more liberal east end though.
Note that the three maps are broadly similar.
How about the 19th Ward? Huge conservative bloc in Mt Greenwood. Again unsurprisingly, way below citywide averages in that area. Voters east of Western carried the ward for Biden. But the maps are all broadly similar. Red in middle, blue on right.
So here's the kicker: the 43rd Ward, Lincoln Park.
Biden is at or above his citywide averages in most places. This is not Trump country.
But Kim and the Fair Tax got absolutely clobbered here.
I guess these folks are still "liberal" in the sense of, like, thinking Trump is disgusting.
But the two most potent issues for our party — fighting wealth inequality and transforming a broken justice system — were on the ballot this year. And the lakefront took a hard pass.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"It's okay that the Fair Tax failed, just cut waste": A thread
Wanna cut that bloated public sector? Oops, IL is 44th in the nation in public sector employees per capita, and 30th in state government spending per capita.
Up next: $2B in higher ed funding. Might be some room to trim there (Lovie Smith's salary, anyone?). But oops: IL has lost 17% of its enrollment since 2013, 3rd-worst in the country. Probably not the time to invest *less* in our universities...
I think it's worth a little discussion about the meaning of the word "bailout" and why it's so offensive when it refers to our schools
The term "bailout" is derived from pilots jumping out of a crashing plane. It took on its financial meaning in the Depression, to refer to government spending money to save a failing private enterprise
So to describe meeting teachers' contract demands, like more nurses and social workers, as a "bailout" of CPS is troubling in two ways. First, it presupposes that CPS is irrevocably failing, which a) sucks, b) is wrong, and c) flies in the face of the city's own recent narratives
Looks like we're poised to call a vote on the Fair Tax amendment around 1pm today. Will post updates in this thread.
This is maybe the most important vote I'll take in my entire career. Let me explain.
In their infinite wisdom, the drafters of the 1970 Illinois Constitution put in a provision mandating one flat tax rate on all income.
That's resulted in a broken system where poor people pay way more in taxes than the 1%. (Sales, excise, and other taxes being very regressive.)
It's also meant that we have a revenue crisis in the state. Because taxing one person means taxing everyone, politicians are reluctant to raise revenues. So spending on basic obligations — schools, healthcare, etc. — have outpaced tax receipts.
1. @JBPritzker has been lying about this. He said his only offshore money was trusts set up by his grandfather. Turns out, he set up offshore companies himself in 2011. Not a good look.
2. He's talked this whole campaign about rich people paying their fair share. But he's been deliberately hiding his #JBillions in the Bahamas so he doesn't have to pay his share