If one puts his mind in the action of his opponent’s body, his mind will be taken by the action of his opponent’s body.

If he puts his mind in his opponent’s sword, his mind will be taken by that sword.
If he puts his mind in thoughts of his opponent’s intention to strike him, his mind will be taken by thoughts of his opponent’s intention to strike him.

If he puts his mind in his own sword, his mind will be taken by his own sword.
If he puts his mind in his own intention of not being struck, his mind will be taken by his intention of not being struck.

If he puts his mind in the other man’s stance, his mind will be taken by the other man’s stance.

What this means is that there is no place to put the mind.
“Well, then, where does one put his mind.”

I answered, “If you don’t put it anywhere, it will go to all parts of your body and extend throughout its entirety. In this way, when it enters your hand, it will realize the hand’s function.
When it enters your foot, it will realize the foot’s function. When it enters your eye, it will realize the eye’s function.

If you should decide on one place and put the mind there, it will be taken by that place and lose its function. If one thinks,
he will be taken by his thoughts.

Because this is so, leave aside thoughts and discrimination, throw the mind away from the entire body, do not stop it here and there, and when it does visit these various places, it will realize function and act without error

-Takuan Soho
Where one puts the mind
terebess.hu/zen/Unfettered…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thisisnottea

Thisisnottea Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ThisIsNotTea

11 Nov
So I have been listening to the raw audio in my spare time, as I do it, I'm going to highlight some creepy takes.

this was in the veritas video, but at 36:20 the context makes it incredibly creepy, because Hopkins is wondering if 2+2 = 5.

And the Agent, is like 'yeah I'm pushing you right now'

I also recommend EVERYONE listen to this audio, because it's a good case study of how a LEO will come at you to get you to incriminate yourself.

It's why the saying is 'Don't talk to the police', get a lawyer.
At 42:05 the agent is guiding Hopkins along, playing philosophical tricks to make him explicitly unsure about what the whole scenario is.

Very Follow/Lead a la @ScottAdamsSays

Read 54 tweets
10 Nov
I really like looking at this stupid 'preplanning' document the Dems tried to put together, Here is my thread on the scenarios that they were trying to come up with, and play against.

It gives some insight into their stupidity, they don't understand Trump
So let's continue at their conclusions. the first part certifies that they were 'doing a good job', and clearly they needed to think a little harder not on, 'strategies' but on systems. but hey, I guess they the experts, lets just skip that first bullet. Image
So this is a good example of why no one ever gets prosecuted in our current political system.

Everyone is about 'exit packages' and no one is about actually helping America, this is extremely common in the Neo-pols, it's why Obama didn't go after Bush didn't go after Clinton. Image
Read 6 tweets
9 Nov
this is the scenario they are trying to run, lets dig in! Image
Turn one, didn't follow this scenario all that closely, they missed that there would be massive statistical evidence that the fraud happened.

Common problem with Neo-Pols, (management), they don't understand when their engineers tell them the risks, assuming things will be fine. ImageImage
Again, big problem with Neo-pol thinking, 'nah, narrow lead'

a 'narrow lead' doesn't mean much at all, to them everything is a number, a statistic, YOU are a statistic.

The LAW is just how much money it takes to bribe someone. Image
Read 13 tweets
9 Nov
Going to have to make a #hubris thread, simply because it's happening at light speed!

Hang on tight folks!
There are so many things wrong with this press conference, it just reeks of idiocy...or just plain ol' lies.

Namely, 'office of the president elect', 'the election is over' both hilariously untrue.

Fox News Anchors apparently don't know much about civics.

'calling it' doesn't mean squat, but she seems unconvinced that is the case, I suppose reality will hit her like a ton of bricks.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!