Inc this quote from Labour Lords leader @LadyBasildon: “I am sure some in government will initially react with bravado and try to dismiss tonight’s historic votes in the Lords.
“To do so, however, would underestimate the genuine and serious concerns across the UK and beyond.."
“The government should see sense, accept the removal of these offending clauses, and start to rebuild our international reputation.”
No.10 reacts to Lords defeat by saying:
"We will retable these clauses when the Bill returns to the Commons."
That @JoeBiden collision course has been set. Of course, if a trade deal is agreed this month, it could all be academic..?
Govt: "We are disappointed that the Lords has voted to remove clauses from the UK Internal Market Bill, which was backed in the Commons by 340 votes to 256 + delivers on a clear Conservative manifesto commitment."
Except..the manifesto didn't say *anything* about breaking int law
What the manifesto actually said:"We will ensure that Northern Ireland’s businesses and producers enjoy unfettered access to the rest of the UK and that in the implementation of our Brexit deal, we maintain and strengthen the integrity and smooth operation of our internal market"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This sets @BorisJohnson on a collision course with @JoeBiden. If the PM revives in the Commons next month the plan to break international law, US may well take a dim view.
Tory MP @DSimmonds_RNP says that @MarcusRashford's experience of child poverty "took place entirely under a Labour government".
"Was he moved, as I was, by the @timesredbox article that @MarcusRashford wrote? Did he feel it quite striking that the anxieties and difficulties that he described growing up with his mum's worry about feeding the children took place entirely under a Labour govt?"
Reminder: @MarcusRashford was actually 11 years old when the Tories came to power in May 2010.
And he actually wrote in his article in June that he understood the importance of free school meals "because ten years ago I was one of them". thetimes.co.uk/article/ending…
In a point of order, @K_Fletcher_MP says: “She has shamed Manchester, shamed this House and she should apologise.”
Deputy speaker reminds MPs of need to "use appropriate language" in the chamber.
Source close to @SadiqKhan tells me: "The PM just lied to the House. Before Covid-19 Sadiq was fixing his mess at TfL, reducing deficit by 71% since 2016.
"Covid-19 is the sole cause of TfL’s financial challenge but he wants to punish Londoners by increasing taxes, fares + C-Chg"
The exact wording in the @grantshapps letter 1 Oct:
"Given the significant rise in congestion in inner London, we also propose the extension of the central London congestion charging zone to cover the same area as the Ultra Low Emission Zone and at the same time, October 2021."
Screenshot of the actual Shapps letter. Makes clear the govt (not Khan) proposed an extension of C-charge zone.
Minority view I know, but I wonder if @BorisJohnson will come out of today better than many expect? Bloodied but unbowed etc.
Famous last words but politics has a habit of not following a script.
Try this on for size:
[1/3]
In #PMQs he is sure to use VanTam opposition to circuitbreaker to counter-attack Starmer.
Plus (if he's smart) he cd unilaterally give £60m to GManchester to avoid punishment beating charge.
He also has South Yorks deal agreed now.
[2/3]
Tory MPs' unhappiness with Burnham cd avoid big rebellion on 1st Opp Day motion
Real problem is @MarcusRashford 2nd Opp day motion. Will govt U-turn late (PMQs wd be perfect forum for such a surprise) or abstain to reduce damage?
The really baffling thing about all this is why the PM didn't just announce he was giving £60m to Greater Manchester to help local firms, even though it wasn't agreed.
If he'd done that, he would have avoided all the noise about seeming to punish the north.
.@RobertJenrick tells @Marthakearney the £60m has "got greater Manchester's name on it" and the offer is still on the table.
And in new bullish move, says he's ready for talks with local council leaders. Does sound like he's cutting @AndyBurnhamGM out of the talks.