Biden's political project is to attempt to not resolve any contradiction in any direction for as long as he can. A hollowed out interregnum, with continuously escalating police, far-right and imperialist violence and no vision but the grey of quietly stated margins.
The violence of US imperialism - even its fascist "excesses" - will continue unabated. Its police departments will riot when they please. Fascist terrorism is already normalised to the point of being an electoral stance capable of winning around half the electorate.
What remains is a split bourgeoisie atop a decaying empire that has no route to stop its fall. Trump forced confrontations over these contradictions; Biden's entire job is to prevent "embarrasment" - that is to find what bourgeois unity can be built among the blood of decay.
The nature of collapse is the increasing failure of capitalist structures to fulfill their social function. At present, this has produced atrophy and a corresponding failure of bourgeois political projects.
There is no way out of the collapse but socialism.
All modes of production are social expressions of humanity's fundamental struggle to produce and reproduce itself as an alienated part of nature. This one is failing on everything, to the extent it is obliterating the conditions which allow that struggle to take place at all.
Capital is neither Red nor Blue; Blue and Red are strands of capital.
Now, before we get too ahead of ourselves on combating Biden, we need to understand that the contradiction that Trump expressed has actually deepened. This is most evident in his slow burning attempts to either simulate or do a coup.
As @luke_meeham and I discussed on Friday in an election podcast episode I'll get up tomorrow, the possibilities of this succeeding are very slim. Something new has been revealed of Trump's base - that is, to use Luke's words, "bigger and less scary".
This is to say we haven't seen the kind of violence one would expect from Trump's lot, whilst at the same time they are much bigger than you would expect. I don't rule out Trump managing to pull this off as yet, but this does suggest he probably won't.
However, this does mean that "Trumpism" is here to stay. Whilst I think the notion that Trump has completely transformed the Republicans is a little overstated, he certainly holds broad hegemony over them.
As such, the political force which the Democrats will be contesting is that of a broadly "Trumpist" Republican Party. Biden is not going to be able to wield executive powers as brazenly as Trump because this would undermine what he is meant to represent to the bourgeoisie.
This leaves the results, assuming Biden has secured the Presidency and Trump fails in his maybe-maybe not coup, as one in which the Biden admin will *always* be wrestling with Trumpism. The split in the bourgeoisie is entrenched. Hence why his role is to avoid resolving things.
Biden is a vile imperialist and this needs to be stated plainly. His pursuits are going to be violent and disgusting. In addition, where he appears to offer a different route to Trump, he won't be (a) brazen or (b) politically dominant enough in the House or Senate to do it.
Political contradictions and forces don't disappear because of electoral defeat. They adapt, change and work within the new terrain of their contradictions. Liberalism fundamentally *does not* conceive of this any longer, so the "struggle" they put up is going to be pathetic.
TL;DR: Elections are a way of giving approval to of bourgeois political projects. This one failed to perform that function, deepening a rift that has been brewing for decades. Biden isn't going to be so much an administration as the public face of an internal fight.
TL;DR 2: The Unites States is presently an ostrich, head in quick sand, waving an assault rifle around in its hands, trigger permanently held down, preying it keeps missing itself.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Pretty definite stance here from Pompeo. Gonna get wild soon if it's gonna get wild.
The imagery of having Mike "regime change" Pompeo say this is quite stark.
Idk if it's just what 4 years of every potential bourgeois opposition being utterly useless and incapable has done to my brain, but I always get the feeling Trump is gonna be able to pull something off when people laugh and say he couldn't possibly.
Trump's lame duck Presidency (the bit after a new President is elected) kicks off with a purge of the Defence Secretary. Always a good sign that wannabe dictators totally don't do.
Replaced with the recently appointed and now former head of counterterrorism, Christopher Miller, a “yes man” in Esper’s words.
Look, I don’t think this is coup territory or anything yet, but man, that is a *posture*.
The highest turnout since 1900 to vote between overt fascism and a man who’s campaign was “I am not like him in a personal sense shhhh about policies”.
Bourgeois dictatorship gone terribly senile.
The real winner this election was the military industrial complex. Would you believe it, it won 100% of the vote.
In terms of where we're at: Trump's base suddenly seem a lot less violent prone. I think this probably the result of not having clear direction. They can't do a coup unless Trump manages to shift something dramatically in his "lame duck Presidency" (and HE WILL TRY).
That the coronavirus has reduced air pollution, water pollution and so on DOES NOT demonstrate that "wE'Re tHE ViRus", people are the problem or any other number of absurd eco-fascist conjecture.
Capitalism is shutting down. It demonstrates that capitalism is the problem.
If you accept these eco-fascist lines, you are paving the way for the largest programme of eugenics this planet has ever seen. It is already in motion ("only the vulnerable will die" = fascist apologia).
Not one death is acceptable.
Not one step forward for the reactionaries.
The idea that this is "just people's fault" is demonstrated as absurd when one examines the observation being used to support it here.
Coronavirus has not eliminated humanity in these places. It shut down capitalist production and consumption.
The US Navy has deployed a low yield nuclear warhead. This gives concrete form to the US' approach to the use of nuclear weapons, and marks a serious escalation in its global campaign to maintain dominance. #SocialismorExtinctionfas.org/blogs/security…
Firstly, we must ground this in contemporary US nuclear policy. As was revealed last year, the US now considers nuclear arms not only viable, but a potential at every stage of military planning. This gives a broad contexr.
The thinking behind this is derived from Herman Kahn. It is the idea that nuclear arms can be used in a limited way and that this need not escalate to all out nuclear confrontation. The US now even believes that a limited strike may "restore strategic stability".
The "hybrid" and "greyzone" US approach to Iran continues. This will continue to escalate, and the US will make more moves. #HandsOffIran
There were only three big moments in Trump's rambly nonsense:
(a) the *demand* that Britain, Germany, France, Russia and China *must* abandon the JCPOA (which is already dead) is a more aggressive iteration of what the US is trying here anyway. It may backfire spectacularly;
(b) the hypersonic missile mention was an attempt to show that the US can deter Russia - it can't because the US missiles aren't operational;
(c) "we do not need middle east oil" confirms US objectives in the region are about getting other exporters off the market now.