Phil Syrpis Profile picture
11 Nov, 14 tweets, 3 min read
First the European 'Research' Group. Now the Covid 'Recovery' Group.

A quick thread on why their ideas appeal, and why they are dangerous. 1/
They appeal because they tell people what they want to hear. They propose simple solutions which people want to be true (h/t @rolandmcs).

[There's a cartoon to insert here of people choosing the easy path and falling off a cliff, which I can't find!] 2/
In relation to Brexit, they say that the UK (as a sovereign state) should have regulatory freedom. Also, it should (as now) have access to European markets. And (again as now) there is no need for hard borders, unless of course they are forced on us by 'the other side'. 3/
The position is absurd, as many have been trying to explain for years. @jonworth said it all very well (again) yesterday.
jonworth.eu/the-internal-m… 4/
But, there is no denying that it has appeal. It would be great if it were true. It would be great if one could, against all the odds, have one's cake and eat it too. Maybe if you just believe hard enough? 5/
On Covid, I know a lot less than I do about Brexit. That may or may not be true for members of the ERG and CRG. Given that I know less, I can perhaps more easily recognise the appeal of the CRG message. 6/
What if the effects of Covid are exaggerated? What if lockdowns, restrictions, etc don't work? What if the disease will simply pass, and we can live normally? What if the population will acquire herd immunity?

Wouldn't that be great? 7/
From everything which I've read since March, that seems vanishingly unlikely. The disease is real. It spreads very quickly. It has killed many people. Uncontrolled, it looks like it will kill many more. 8/
What is needed is an approach which controls the virus, and at the same time allows the economy and society to function. Some restrictions are here to stay (at least until the vaccine can be shown to work, and at scale). 9/
A working test, trace and isolate system seems to be essential.

And we don't (yet...) have one. 10/
The approach of the ERG and the CRG is to belittle problems, to wish them away, and then to rage against sacrifices or constraints which others say are necessary. 11/
Pretending that a real problem does not exist does not solve it. Planning, and hard work, and coordination, is needed to mitigate the damage of both Brexit and Covid. 12/
The ERG/CRG, by belittling the problem, not only fail to make a contribution; they also stand in the way of those who are. They skew the debate in dangerous ways. 13/
They have significant power in the Tory Party, and huge influence over the Govt. They have a message which resonates with what people want to hear.

But instead of solutions, they only offer false hope. 14/14

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phil Syrpis

Phil Syrpis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @syrpis

17 Oct
The stand-off between @BorisJohnson and @AndyBurnhamGM is developing into something very interesting. Thread. 1/9
Number 10's plan has some appeal. Given where we are with COVID, and the big variation in case numbers, it makes sense, in public health terms, to have a local response. 2/9
It also makes sense, this time in a political sense, to share, or to pass, responsibility for tighter restrictions on to local politicians (I think Michael Portillo made this point on Question Time). 3/9
Read 9 tweets
15 Oct
Today's Brexit news does not come as a surprise. There has, once again, been no meaningful progress. It is *very easy* to see why. And December approaches. 1/8
In a negotiation, it pays to understand the position of the other side. The EU side has struggled to understand the position of the UK. The UK side has made next to no effort to understand position of the EU. 2/8
The UK is asking for *both* unfettered regulatory freedom and unfettered access to the EU market. Given the EU's - unambiguous - insistence on the integrity of the single market, and the realities of international trade, that is an impossible ask. 3/8
Read 8 tweets
15 Oct
A long thread (sorry) about Universities and the response to COVID-19. It's very much a personal view. 1/22
I'm not going to go through the history - on that, I whole-heartedly recommend @gsoh31's blog (below). Instead, I focus on some of the steps which led us to where we are today.
publicpolicypast.blogspot.com/2020/09/end-of… 2/
Since March we have had... (1) the last-minute move to online teaching for the end of the 19/20 academic year, with online assessments in May/June and August/September. Exams and exam rules rewritten, with staff working from home to process them. 3/
Read 24 tweets
13 Oct
Just had the misfortune to see @RobertJenrick's interview on the BBC. 1/12
The rhetoric goes like this: We are at a moment of maximum danger. We have hard choices to make. We will work closely with local leaders. And, wait for it, we have devised a new framework. 2/
This new 3 tier framework (with the country divided into 'medium', 'high' and 'very high') has been getting lots of attention. But, it has not been properly scrutinised. 3/
Read 14 tweets
8 Oct
As per usual, moved to tweet out of frustration born of watching the news. This is on the new '3 tier coronavirus restrictions'. The acknowledged urgent need is to provide people with clarity.

That's a good start. It doesn't last. 1/8
One can imagine the delight in Whitehall as the 'traffic light system' was first proposed. Clear and simple. Red, amber, green. Divide the country into 3 zones. Have stricter rules where the case numbers are highest. 2/
The usual suspects in the press were duly alerted. Boris would be bringing - if not good news - then at least some clarity.

But... it appears that the plan has yet to be fully thought through. 3/
Read 9 tweets
6 Oct
I know nothing about off-shore wind, so I was, ahem, blown away by some of the PM's claims.

But I have 3 questions. 1/4
First, are there any geographical reasons why the UK is best placed to harness the power of the wind? If not, why are other countries missing the boat so spectacularly, and will they continue to do so into the 2030s? 2/4
Second, isn't it easier and cheaper and more efficient to have the windfarms onshore, or close to the shore, rather than in the middle of the deepest oceans? Or does the wind there have special qualities which cannot be harnessed closer the shore? 3/4
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!