Out today, I provide an overview of suggested reforms for the major components of the immigration system. I provide detailed citations for how to make the reforms to the statutes. Congress shouldn't wait to take up reform next year cato.org/publications/e…
Here is my list of 52 specific ideas to vastly improve America's immigration system. Of course, much more should and can be done. But these are my priorities.
Congress should start with the premise that the U.S. permanent immigration system is very restrictive compared both with other wealthy countries among which it ranks in the bottom third for foreign born share and compared to its own history.
My principle for immigration enforcement is simple: identifying with the goal of correcting, not merely punishing, the violation will produce much greater compliance with the law overall.
America should create a permanent status for all illegal immigrants in the country now so it can build a new system that works without the burdens and failures of the old one undermining it. But it should allow immigrants to choose a simple status or onerous path to citizenship
While reducing violations of the law is an important reason to favor more legal immigration, that is not the purpose of the system. The ultimate purpose is to expand the freedom to associate, contract, and trade with people from around the world in many ways
That said, allowing a lot more guest workers from Mexico has greatly reduced illegal immigration, and we should continue to pursue this policy aggressively with Central America.
Of all the border issues, asylum is the one that is most important today, and there is an easy answer to guarantee that violations of the law almost disappear.
For refugees, the most important issue is that the law gives almost all power to the president, and very little power to individuals. Allow private sponsorship outside of any numerical limits.
The family-sponsored system is barely functioning mostly because the way the caps are structured. Reforming the caps and exempting spouses and children would reunite families and provide long-term stability for these important programs
For work-based skilled, permanent immigration, the most important issue is that the United States allows almost none compared to other OECD countries. The U.S. is losing talent to competitors because it makes it almost impossible to get permanent residence as a skilled worker.
Given the massive economic gains, Congress should eliminate both the overall caps on skilled immigration and the country caps, which impose unfair and economically harmful national origin discrimination onto a merit‐based system.
If it doesn't get rid of all caps, it should reform them, again by exempting them and making them respond to economic growth of the United States over time.
The other most important issues are that the US treats temporary foreign workers in skilled positions very poorly relative to other countries.
States and localities need to have a role in setting the terms of entry to fill in gaps that the federal system overlooks. This is a major reason why local problems develop into national crises
Finally, Congress needs to aggressively act to stop the president or executive agencies from undermining or limiting legal immigration in the future. The president shouldn't get to just ban all immigrants for any reason that he likes. We need mechanisms to enforce this
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
During the transition, do you think DHS officials are going to say things like: "Here's how we're still separating families, where we are spending the money for imprisoned immigrant food and health care, how we're blocking asylum applicants, how we pick journalists to target...
"Here's how we target Muslims for additional screening, put Yemenis in 'administrative processing' to drop their visa apps, oh, we gave all premium processing fees to this contractor for this failed online system. Oh, and we secretly changed the H-1B standards over here...
"Look, here's the dumpster for initial DACA apps that we dumped in violation of SCOTUS. Let me show you how we arrest "illegals" living in homes in CA w/o any evidence they crossed the border (just call them human smugglers!), here's how we invent evidence of 'gang ties"...
On his main issue, Trump actually lost ground *among his own party*, setting aside the backlash it's caused among Democrats. Nativists' arguments failed spectacularly, far more than I could have expected these past 4 years pewresearch.org/politics/2018/…
Remember when hating refugees was a main campaign platform for Trump in 2016. He's had 4 years to sell it, and it's failed big time! pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019…
They are stealing jobs? They are killing Americans? Pluralities or majorities of Republicans didn't buy it even at the height of this guy's presidency. A total whiff by NumbersUSA-CIS-FAIR & Trump pewresearch.org/politics/2018/…
Absolutely stunning OIG report finding that Nielsen instructed ports to turn away asylum seekers despite capacity to accept. I have repeatedly argued that her statements to Congress were false about this, but now we know she LIED oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…
3. Research Provides No Basis for Pandemic Travel Bans
"Rather than pinning all its hopes on a Chinese travel restriction, the U.S. government should have spent those early moments preparing a vigorous domestic response to the virus—which it failed to do." cato.org/blog/research-…
Cato published my paper about the employment-based green card backlog today. For the first time, it's over 1 million petitions for workers, investors, and their families. Many health care workers stuck in these lines cato.org/publications/i…
3/4 of the backlog is from India with the numbers increasing rapidly.
More than 200,000 petitions for Indians in the EB-2 and EB-3 skilled worker categories would expire due to the death of the worker if they could find a way to stay in line for the 89 year-wait that they are facing.
1/ Some people are vigorously fighting a bill to end country caps because it will spread the pain caused by too few green cards to every applicant, not just Indians. They say, "Just increase green cards instead!" Here's how the politics of this works out in practice:
2/ They fight tooth and nail to protect their preference, and Sen Durbin stops the bill. Durbin goes to Sen Lee and says, "Can we up green cards?" Lee says, "No." Do bill opponents fight tooth and nail *now*, to get Lee to change his mind? No, b/c it doesn't actually affect them
3/ I'm totally perplexed by those who claim that they want to "unify" all immigrants to fight for more green cards. But as long as the country caps exist, only Indians will have any reason to actually fight for that. As long as everyone else is fast-tracked, they don't care