This Day in Labor History: November 11, 1918. French authorities in Indochina created the first labor code for its rubber plantations, tying workers to the land and creating a horrifying exploitative system. Let's talk about the labor history of colonialism! Image
As the rubber industry took off in Indochina in the early twentieth century, French authorities demanded pliant labor for it. French planters wanted cheap labor, they wanted a lot of it, and they didn’t want to have them move around.
But malaria was endemic in Cochinchina (South Vietnam before the 1975 unification of the country). Planters looked as far as China and Java to find laborers. Sanitation was becoming a major issue that planters and the French colonial government had to take seriously.
In one rubber plantation in 1914, mostly with Cambodian migrant laborers, over one-half of workers were found to have malaria during a two-day doctor’s visit.
This obviously had a major impact on both the willingness of workers to leave the highlands to work in these plantations and the production of rubber. Other industries faced similar sanitary problems; a cholera epidemic in 1908 killed over 1,500 railroad workers in the region.
In November 1917, the French colonial government put together a commission to combine the needs of tying labor in place and keeping it relatively healthy. Somewhat oddly announced on Armistice Day, the new labor code only applied to Cochinchina.
It was created with very little Vietnamese input–two of the fourteen members were Vietnamese, with the rest being French officials and planters. The new labor code required workers to carry identification cards with their pictures.
It also required a three year contract for agricultural labor. This was a new frontier in pinning labor on the land, as planters had long complained about the inability to force workers to labor for them for more than one year.
There were severe penalties for worker resistance, especially active organized labor resistance.
An early draft even gave planters the right to hunt down workers who left the plantation, but that seemed a bit harsh and lawyers said it was basically slavery, which was technically illegal. But big fines and jail time for organizing or desertion were included.
Now, the colonial government knew it was going to take some heat for such a draconian labor code. So it tried to frame the new labor code as good for workers because it improved working and living conditions.
Theoretically, this could have been true although it is hardly a justification for the horrors of the labor code in general. But it was not true in the end. The labor code provided housing, free medical care, “adequate” food, and some protection for mothers who worked there.
But the vagueness of the food provision allowed planters to still give workers low-quality food and not enough food. Planters would recruit labor by falsely promising free food.
It took until 1927 until a revision to the labor code specified that at the very least, planters had to give workers rations of rice daily.
While some workers left the highlands of northern Vietnam seeking better opportunities than the peasant life could provide, but a lot of times, it was human trafficking, luring people in with the promise of something better and then holding them in a state of near-slavery.
When workers got sick, as they often did, the plantations would attempt to charge the northern villages where the workers came from for their medical care. Major legal cases within the colonial legal system came up over this issue of responsibility for ill workers.
A big part of the problem is that while the labor code was indeed passed in 1918, the actual implementation and enforcement of the limited positive provisions of it were extremely slow to nonexistent for several years, as we saw earlier with the food problems.
In the early years after the institution of the labor code, only about 4 percent of the workforce actually deserted and only a few of them were rounded up.
But by the late 1920s, conditions deteriorated even further, there were more escape attempts, and a greater system of labor surveillance arose to corral those workers. By this time, about 11 percent of workers were escaping.
Death rates were skyrocketing and many sought to flee these horrible lives.
Ironically, the plantations with slightly better conditions had higher desertion rates because they tended to be near the cities, while the truly brutal camps were out near the Cambodian border and there was nowhere for the workers to go so they tended to escape less often.
Among the terrible conditions that led workers to escape was planters refusing to give rice to sick workers, an endless system of fines that kept workers in peonage, physical abuse, brutal working conditions, illegal imprisonment, and of course low wages.
Malaria was also endemic. On one plantation in 1927, 23 percent of workers died of malaria in the first six months of the year. Not just came down it, died from it.
The plantation director claimed it was because the workers were a bunch of opium addicts and also blind when they arrived to work.
The actual reason for this was the deforestation to create rubber plantations and the standing water this left that created mosquito infestations. But of course what did the planters care?
Eventually, this led to enough bad press that quinine became a common treatment for sick workers. Malnutrition also continued to be a huge issue. Beriberi was a real problem.
The plantations were often pretty far away from the rice-growing regions and so shoddy import networks were created, but this often did a poor job of providing enough food to live.
One story will suffice to describe this labor system. Tran Kinh got sick. He worked sick for three days and on the fourth could go no more. When he requested time off to heal, his boss beat him with a rattan cane and then docked him three days of salary for being lazy.
A few months later, he got sick again. This time, the director of the plantation tied his feet together and threw him against the base of a coconut tree. He sat there for three days, exposed to the weather and without food.
Finally, someone took mercy and gave him some rice, but he got even sicker. There are other stories like this as well, but evidently the archival evidence is limited before 1927 because most of this was just not reported.
A revised labor code in 1927 attempted to address some of these issues and provided more rules and regulations, but in the end did little to really make a difference in the lives of exploited workers.
In conclusion, it is indeed shocking that communism became appealing for large sectors of the Vietnamese workforce in the coming decades.
I drew from Michitake Aso’s 2018 book, Rubber and the Making of Vietnam: An Ecological History, 1897-1975, to write this thread. Excellent book, check it out.
Back tomorrow to discuss the 1892 New Orleans general strike.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Erik Loomis

Erik Loomis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ErikLoomis

12 Nov
This Day in Labor History: November 12, 1892. The New Orleans General Strike ended with a major victory for workers!! Let's talk about this great moment in our labor history! Image
In early 1892, New Orleans’ streetcar drivers won a strike and received union recognition and a shorter workday. This inspired workers across New Orleans to form unions and join up their organizations with the American Federation of Labor. About 30 new unions formed.
Around 20,000 workers were union members and they formed their own labor federation called the Workingmen’s Amalgamated Council. Moreover, some of these unions were racially integrated.
Read 36 tweets
12 Nov
Finally listening to Vampire Weekend's Father of the Bride. Which is appropriately titled since it is boring dad rock.
Now trying out the 2019 album by Russian Circles, Blood Year. Like lots of post-rock instrumental bands, it's capably enough executed but I can't figure out why I would listen to this again. Takes a lot for instrumental rock to excite me.
I suppose it's more accurate to put this closer to metal than post-rock, but whatever.
Read 4 tweets
10 Nov
This Day in Labor History: November 10, 1933. !orkers at the Hormel plant in Austin, Minnesota sat down on the job. Possibly the first sit-down strike in American history, the win these workers achieved helped set up the labor militancy of the New Deal era. Let's talk about it! Image
The Industrial Workers of the World had basically been crushed after World War I, during the Red Scare. Leaderless, with Big Bill Haywood dying in exile in Moscow, the organization divided into factions in the 1920s that effectively made it irrelevant.
It would still pop up every now and again, especially in areas where it had built real worker support, such as the forests of northern Idaho and western Montana. But by and large, it was an afterthought in an era where the left had turned to communism.
Read 31 tweets
8 Nov
This Day in Labor History: November 8, 1970. Congress approved the Reorganization Acts Amendment that laid the groundwork for the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency. Let's talk about the EPA is a pro-worker agency! Image
The need for the EPA was nearly undeniable. The nation’s industrial past had absolutely devastated the natural world. Corporations could dump pollution wherever they wanted and they did so with aplomb. Pittsburgh was famous for its smoke, Cleveland had burning rivers.
Oil slicks covered California beaches and had led to legendary gushers covering the land in Texas and Oklahoma. Companies such as General Electric dumped PCBs in the Hudson River and other waterways around the nation.
Read 37 tweets
5 Nov
This Day in Labor History: November 5, 1916. Police and their thugs in Everett, Washington slaughter between 5 and 12 members of the IWW as they attempted to dock in the town to organize there. Let's talk about the Everett Massacre!
Shingle weavers lived a tough life. You could always tell who was new to the job. The newbie had 10 fingers. Shingle weavers created roofing shingles out of raw pieces of cedar.
They did so with bare hands and whirring buzz saws without protection. In addition, the saws produced wood dust that workers breathed in. “Cedar asthma” was a common malady.
Read 22 tweets
4 Nov
Results from Pinellas County look extremely favorable. +1 Trump in 16, +8 for Biden with 75% of votes counted
Naturally, I don't know if that is all mail-in ballots or anything. But still.
Brevard County was Clinton -20. With 73% of votes in, it's Biden -10. That's a big shift too.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!