Day 9 of #spycops inquiry: three #spycops who infiltrated campaign against Vietnam war – “John Graham”, “Barry Morris” and “Margaret White”.
Plus statement to be read from Ernest Tate, of Vietnam Solidarity Campaign and an organiser of Vietnam war protest in London in 1968.
First up today, “HN329”, a #spycop in the Met Special Branch’s “Special Demonstration Squad” from 1968.
He used the cover name “John Graham”.
In his written statement, “John Graham” says that before he joined Met’s SDS he was in “C Squad” where he was “carrying out Communism related enquiries” and “engaging in covert work”.
When he joined the SDS, “John Graham” tells #spycops inquiry that he does not recall the name “SDS” being used.
“To me, the Unit was referred to as ‘The Hairies’ because a number of undercover officers grew their hair and beards.”
“John Graham” clarifies to #spycops inquiry that “C squad” also sat within Met’s Special Branch.
The difference between C Squad and SDS was that while working in the latter he used a cover identity.
At the SDS, his target was the Vietnam Solidarity Committee.
“John Graham” tells #spycops inquiry thats SDS had around 12 other members when he joined.
He explains that within Special Branch, A Squad dealt with administration, C Squad with communism and D Squad with naturalisation.
“John Graham” to #spycops inquiry: “Fifty years ago, because of the cold war, the Cuban missile crisis and the fear that there was going to be a world war, communism was of paramount interest and so there would have been reporting on anyone who might be a communist.”
Tariq Ali’s barrister, Rajiv Menon, clashes with Sir John Mitting, chairman of #spycops inquiry.
Menon wants to ask “John Graham” several qus, but Mitting allows only one topic.
Menon: “I cannot understand…”
Mitting: Ask about the one topic or, “You will be silenced.”
I only caught part of this extraordinary exchange between Sir John Mitting and Rajiv Menon at #spycops inquiry, as transcript flitted through.
Menon made application to ask “John Graham” further questions.
Mitting rather forcefully told Menon that he could not, bar one topic.
Rajiv Menon said that there was enough time for him to ask his further questions without disrupting today’s timetable of #spycops inquiry.
Sir John Mitting replied that this was not the point. He was worried about setting a precedent for further questions for future witnesses.
Rajiv Menon began to ask Sir John Mitting for the reasons for being disallowed to ask “John Graham” about all but one of the proposed topics, to which Mitting even more forcefully said that he had given his ruling.
Ask about your one topic, or “You will be silenced.”
Statement of Ernest Tate, of Vietnam Solidarity Campaign, is being read out (and live streamed) at #spycops inquiry by his barrister, Nick Stanage:
Of course, because Ernest Tate’s statement is simply being read out to #spycops inquiry, it is deemed to be “safe” to live stream its reading.
Ernest Tate says in his statement that disclosures from #spycops inquiry show that he featured in 23 Special Branch reports by #spycops in 1968-9.
He thinks this is only a partial picture because it is evidence that Special Branch opened a file on him in 1966.
From the newly-available transcript, I can be more precise about the extraordinary clash between Rajiv Menon and Sir John Mitting at #spycops inquiry at the end of this morning’s session re possible further questions for “John Graham”, the first #spycop witness to be called...
Rajiv Menon, Tariq Ali’s barrister, applied to ask qus on seven topics that fell into three categories:
- topics not covered by qus already put by David Barr, counsel to #spycops inquiry;
- follow-ups to qus already put;
- responses by “John Graham” not in his statement.
Sir John Mitting, chairman of #spycops inquiry: “You have already submitted your suggested topics to Mr Barr, I think, have you not?”
Yes, said Rajiv Menon. “I complied with the protocol that you put in force.” He had submitted a list of topics that he wished to ask witness.
Rajiv Menon continued at #spycops inquiry: “I received, this morning, a reply from the inquiry…
“But a number of matters that I had hoped would be asked haven't been asked, and hence my oral application.”
Sir John Mitting: “What topics do you want to ask about?”
Rajiv Menon said that he wanted to ask about:
- motiviations of SDS, #spycops unit;
- selection of VSC;
- SDS methods;
- intelligence gleaned that helped prevent disorder at protest against Vietnam war;
- “Box 500” ie MI5;
- a specific #spycop document raised this morning.
Rajiv Menon added: “I notice that we have plenty of time…” and said that he could ask his questions without disrupting the day’s timetable for #spycops inquiry.
But Sir John Mitting was not having it…
Sir John Mitting: “That may be so, but I have to keep order in the proceedings.”
He needs to ensure not merely that this witness is “not troubled” by questions already covered at #spycops inquiry, he said, “but also that this does not set a precedent for future such requests.”
Sir John Mitting told Rajiv Menon at #spycops inquiry that he could ask only about the last of the proposed topics.
Rajiv Menon: “But, sir, I’ve highlighted-”
Mitting: “You may ask about that, but not other topics. That is my ruling.”
Rajiv Menon said to Sir John Mitting at #spycops inquiry: “Very well, sir. Can I make it clear that I cannot understand-”
Mitting: “No, you may not. I'm sorry. You may ask your questions, or you will be silenced.”
Menon: “Very well.”
Meanwhile, it turns out that #spycops inquiry is only reading out “summaries” of statements from two further #spycops today.
First, “Barry Morris” sometimes “Barry Morse”, but real name revealed as Barry Moss, and second, “Margaret White”.
Barry Moss, a later head of Special Branch, aka Barry Morris and Barry Morse says in statement read to inquiry that #spycops in SDS, unlike the rest of Special Branch, undercover officers would join target groups rather than simply attending and observing public meetings.
Only a summary of Barry Moss’s statement is read to inquiry.
“Margaret White”, whose real name is being kept secret, says in summary of statement read to inquiry that she was deployed into Vietnam Solidarity Group with another #spycop, the pair posing as girlfriend-boyfriend.
Nine #spycops were covertly deployed at a single anti-Vietnam war meeting of about 250 people in 1968, inquiry heard in second day of evidence.
Why so many? “There was nothing else on,” said one #spycop.
Day 10 of #spycops inquiry: two #spycops due to be called, first from management/back office, second used cover name, “Douglas Edwards”.
Summaries of evidence from three further #spycops – including “Don De Freitas” and “William Paul Lewis” – to be read out by inquiry lawyer.
Summary of statement by #spycop “Don De Freitas” read to inquiry: he was in SDS during 1968. He worked elsewhere in Special Branch before + after his brief time in SDS.
He targeted Vietnam Solidarity Campaign, and posed as boyfriend of “Margaret White”:
Summary of statement by #spycop “William/Bill Paul Lewis” read to inquiry: he was in SDS 1968-9; says that any #spycop arrested while undercover would have the issue resolved later.
Summary of statement by a third #spycop, cypher “HN322”, says that he did not use a cover name.
Today, finally, #spycops inquiry is due to start hearing evidence, but it is not being live streamed to public.
We have been hearing core participants’ opening statements since last week. There may still be one or two more of those today before evidence begins.
Despite suggestion by Sir John Mitting yesterday that we would hear one or two further opening statements this am (we still have not heard from Dave Smith, a blacklisted construction worker, and Helen Steel, one of the McLibel 2), #spycops inquiry is going straight into evidence.
Sir John Mitting, chairman of #spycops inquiry, clarifies that Dave Smith cannot give his opening statement because he has contracted coronavirus.
Helen Steel cannot give hers because of unspecified different reasons. They may give their statements at some later point.
We start by hearing a broadside delivered at both #spycops inquiry and the Met delivered by Baroness Lawrence via her barrister, Imran Khan.
Baroness Lawrence, mother, of course, of Stephen Lawrence, “is losing confidence, if she has not already lost it, in the inquiry’s ability to get to the truth,” says Imran Khan to #spycops inquiry.
We are hearing this am at undercover policing inquiry from Philippa Kaufman the truly mind-blowing story of state sexual abuse of 20 women whom she represents by #spycops, and how these women unearthed who their “boyfriends” really were and exposed them. ucpi.org.uk/hearing/openin…
Philippa Kaufman also represents a 21st woman who developed a friendship, albeit not a sexual relationship, with a #spycop.
You can see her giving her and others later today giving opening statements at this link: ucpi.org.uk/hearing/openin…
Note that Philippa Kaufman’s opening statement was only live streamed this morning because she undertook not to state #spycop Carlo Neri’s real name.
I have no idea why because his real name is already in public domain. This is eerily like #CSAinquiry attempt to erase history.
Key points in utterly staggering submissions to #spycops inquiry in opening statements last week on behalf of a wide range of core participants that show the sheer scale of secret political policing in UK have gone unreported.
For example, James Scobie, barrister for several CPs, said on Day 5 of undercover policing inquiry on Friday, that #spycop Rick Gibson helped run the Troops Out Movement in 1974-76 by becoming its London organiser and ultimately joint national secretary. ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
Lord (John) Hendy, representing Fire Brigades Union and Unite the Union, and other unions that were REFUSED core-participant status, spoke also on Day 5 (same link as above) of their deep concern about use of #spycops intelligence for “blacklisting” of trade unionists from work.
MI5, working with #spycops, policing MPs, campaigners and anyone seeking social change, as set out in lengthy opening statement by Rajiv Menon, for some core participants in undercover policing inquiry.
“Undercover policing was severely tainted – corrupted – by political motivations and political bias,” says Matthew Ryder, representing many other core participants in #spycopys inquiry, in opening statement.
A common target for #spycops was anyone who campaigned against racism.
One #spycop, Mike Ferguson, targeted Peter Hain because he was campaigning against apartheid in South Africa.
He is said by other #spycops to have become Hain’s “right hand man”.
But Lord Hain cannot confirm this because inquiry REFUSES to tell him #spycop’s COVER NAME.