The Border Patrol already makes these numbers public once a year. It's not like these are any secret.
What they want to do is throw around numbers which are historically low, but because people don't have any context, they'll freak out about it. It's propaganda.
Importantly, we might expect an increase in reported "got aways" this year from the Border Patrol not because of more *people,* but because of more *data.*
The Border Patrol Chief wrote earlier this year that improved reporting of incidents will itself lead to an increase.
These issues of what data to report or not produce extremely odd results, like this chart from September where the official metric for "known illegal entries" will be massively lower than the target because they don't count Title 42 expulsions. performance.gov/homeland_secur…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The new citizenship test reported on by @priscialva is now officially public. Citizenship applicants will now have to answer 12 of 20 questions right, up from 6 of 10.
This will inevitably lengthen the interview process and lead to fewer interviews a day.
As @priscialva reported, the new test shifts many questions towards broader principles.
For example, "What do we call the first ten amendments to the Constitution?" has been replaced with "What does the Bill of Rights protect?"
Old New
Some questions have been explicitly made harder. For example, "Name one branch or part of the government" has been replaced with "Name the three branches of government."
Notably, Senator-Elect Tuberville got this wrong yesterday
A month before he became the first President since 1992 to lose reelection, Donald Trump stood in front of a cheering crowd and declared that Biden would “turn Minnesota into a refugee camp.”
He went on to lose Minnesota by nearly 6 points more than 2016.
!! Incredible FOIA victory from @DMRS_ElPaso, obtaining key operational documents from MPP’s early rollout, including this memo from Chad Wolf—then acting head of Office of Strategy—concluding that MPP wouldn’t have any singular effect on migration flows. dmrs-ep.org/dmrs-vs-ice-fo…
There’s also this memo from May 2019, previously reported on but never released publicly, where the decision is made to create tent courts along the border and where EOIR admits backlogs are massively growing and resolving all MPP cases timely would require 1/3 of all judges.
Here are talking points for a meeting attended by every major immigration person at DHS.
“MPP is a priority for this Administration, and we must do everything in our power to implement and expand it.”
ZERO mention of concerns about dangers in Mexico for people subject to MPP.
The District Court's opinion vacating the public charge rule acknowledges that the 7th Circuit's opinion upholding its preliminary injunction controls the issue and requires it to enter summary judgement in favor of the plaintiffs. So there's no new legal analysis on the merits.
The government tried to get the District Court to limit relief only to the plaintiff, Cook County. The District Court disagreed, finding that vacating a rule in its entirety is the appropriate remedy under the Administrative Procedure Act, and it isn't a nationwide injunction.