David Roberts Profile picture
12 Nov, 12 tweets, 3 min read
Politics is not a f'ing game, you utter thimblehead. Democrats want to spend billions addressing poverty & homelessness. Republicans want to spend nothing. That difference swamps a few token food-bank donations.

Better oligarchs, please.
There are *millions* of people like this in America, who just want all the political fighting & squabbling to stop so we can move on and [DO THINGS DEMOCRATS ARE ADVOCATING FOR AND REPUBLICANS ARE FIGHTING].
I think all the time about this great interview with singer/songwriter @TheBrandyClark on @SwitchedOnPop. Clark is a close, insightful observer of human foibles -- her songs are soaked in empathy & compassion. She's just a good person. But on politics ...

switchedonpop.com/episodes/brand…
... she doesn't want to take a side. She doesn't want to get involved in the constant furious partisan warfare. She finds it all exhausting & degrading. She shares this feeling with millions of other Americans! But THEN, when probed a little closer, she starts to reveal ...
... her core values. She believes black people should be treated equally, not wantonly killed by police. She believes we should attend to society's weakest & most vulnerable. She views these values as apolitical, as *deeper* than politics, something everyone should agree on.
And yes, in a sane world, we *would* all agree on those principles, they *would* be deeper than politics. They would be fixed & foundational, beyond the reach of partisanship.

But in this world? ONE PARTY AGREES AND THE OTHER DOESN'T.
The values Clark believes should transcend partisanship ... don't. In their words & actions, Republicans make clear that they disagree.

This is the situation average Americans don't understand: basic values they take as beyond politics have become political.
If you believe that all Americans, no matter color, creed, or sexual orientation, should be treated fairly & with compassion, guess what? *You're on a side.* You might not like it, you might not like the aesthetics of constant fighting, you might not like "politics" ...
... but you're on a side. One side is fighting for your values & the other is fighting against them.

And what's more, if the great masses of Americans who share those values don't recognize that they've become partisan & under threat, don't *take their own side* ...
... then that side's gonna lose! We just barely dodged a racist authoritarian takeover & it absolutely won't be the last attempt.

We need people like Clark -- decent, ordinary, "non-political" people -- to realize what's going on & start fighting for their own side.
Which is precisely why sentiments like Cuban's are so toxic. They reinforce the notion that simple decency toward the vulnerable is separate from politics, that it transcends politics. It doesn't. One side is for it. One is against it. The side that's for it is gonna lose ...
... if people like Clark & Cuban (& millions of others) don't wake up to the fact that the values they take for granted are contested & in serious peril. We've got to make all these non-political normies realize that, whether they like it or not, they're already on a side. </fin>

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Roberts

David Roberts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drvox

11 Nov
Cities produce the vast majority of economic & intellectual activity in this country, but whatever you do, don't repeat that, much less show any pride in it, lest you be accused of insufficiently venerating America's furiously mythologized ruralites.
Countdown to one of the aforementioned ruralites telling me that rural areas "feed the cities" ...
Read 8 tweets
10 Nov
This is a permission structure for cons to spend the next four years denying the legitimacy of Biden's presidency. (They would find some reason regardless, but this will do.) politico.com/news/2020/11/0…
Oh, and also -- as always, always, always -- it's a giant grift. thedailybeast.com/all-the-ways-t…
Read 4 tweets
10 Nov
The party of "tough guys" is filled top to bottom with cringing, boot-licking cowards.
Unbelievably irresponsible, craven cowards, right to the very last.
Liars & cowards that should be shunned by decent people.
Read 4 tweets
9 Nov
All day today I have been having the vertiginously weird experience of trying to convince Democrats that the fact that the RW has a giant, coordinated messaging machine & they don't *matters*. To no effect! I can't even get people to acknowledge & discuss it.
And yet every single Dem, from center to left, is eager AF to discuss "messaging" & "framing." They'll all spend hours lingering over various word combinations, poring over focus group results, convince that just the right phrase is the key to the kingdom. Argh.
Politics is about money & power. Messaging is part of politics & therefore ALSO about money & power. The cleverness or stickiness or virality or whatever TF of individual phrases is not what wins messaging battles. Money & power win them.
Read 12 tweets
8 Nov
I'm a huge NKJ fan & like all of this. But I feel like it makes a common left mistake in focusing too much on the content of messaging & too little on the mechanisms. Right narratives stick not because they're more clever but because the right has a giant media machine!
The right's narratives are echoed throughout a vast apparatus from Fox to Breitbart to radio to Facebook to, now, local newspapers that have been bought by RW billionaires. The left simply has nothing like that! It mostly tries to jam its messages through the distorting filter...
... of mainstream journalism (which doesn't work). This is such a ubiquitous fact about US politics I feel we almost forget it, the way fish don't notice water. So much discussion of what Dems say, or should say, & so little attention ...
Read 7 tweets
7 Nov
Instead of "reaching out," why don't we take this opportunity to make very clear that racism, xenophobia, and authoritarianism are repugnant to a decent society. Let's reject them, loudly & publicly, & extend social disapprobation to those who support them.
When someone expresses racism, xenophobia, or authoritarianism in public, they SHOULD face backlash. We do not need sympathy for those facing such backlash -- that's things working as they should! Reserve your sympathy for racism's millions & millions of victims.
Oh, wait, what's that, your motivations for discrimination & hatred are "religious"? Yeah I don't care.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!