In my experience, most Canadians are unaware that Canada has extremely few available acute care hospital beds (meaning “beds that are maintained, staffed and immediately available for use”) compared to other countries. Here’s the international comparison: data.oecd.org/chart/6a67
What this means: we have less leeway than other countries to max out hospital capacity as intensive care units (ICUs) fill up with COVID-19 patients needing beds, equipment, and health care staff’s attention for days or weeks.
When my research group made an app in April to help people understand how social/physical distancing works to reduce transmission, this is why we noted that hospitals getting overwhelmed is a problem for people with COVID or needing care for other reasons.
The voiceover here (that’s my voice) says: "If we don’t do anything, the Coronavirus can easily spread through your community. It can reach you, the people around you, and others in your community. Some people will have a milder case, perhaps even without symptoms."
“Milder cases are shown by hexagons that turn red, but then fade to pink. But other people, the hexagons that stay red, will have severe cases, and may need to go to the hospital.”
“If too many people have severe cases at once, hospitals may not have enough beds, equipment, or staff to care for everyone.”
“This could be a problem for anyone who needs urgent medical attention, whether for the Coronavirus or for other reasons; for example, a heart attack or car accident.”
This is one of the reasons health professionals & scientists are speaking out right now, even some who are uncomfortable doing so. Hospital care requires beds, equipment, and people to provide the care. We do not have an unlimited supply of any of those. And the people are tired.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thank you @WrightCensored! 5 minutes is a very tough length for me (1-2 minutes is easy, 20 minutes is easy, anything in between is hard to stick to time), so, as usual, I prepared my statement ahead of time! Makes it easy to copy and paste here. 😀
1/Hello, thank you so much for this incredible honour.
2/I’m very grateful to the society @socmdm, to everyone on the awards committee, everyone on the board, my colleagues and friends who nominated the paper, my co-authors, the people at the funding agency who collaborated on the work, my team and my family.
Night owl thread. Not long ago, I finished my 3-year term on a national committee with the worst acronym, the Advisory Committee on Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Program (ACEDIP). It's pronounced AY-suh-dip. (I died a little inside every time I said it.) chairs-chaires.gc.ca/program-progra…
At one of our meetings (2018, I believe?) people came to present their work in progress on the design of a new Canadian program based on Athena Swan. One of their questions was, basically, “Should we start with gender, like the UK did, and expand from there?”
The committee’s unanimous, unequivocal response was: no. We weren’t involved beyond that meeting, but I was glad that the final program, Dimensions, aimed to address multiple dimensions of identity (not as many as I’d like, but it’s a start.) nserc-crsng.gc.ca/NSERC-CRSNG/ED…
I’m starting to see discussion about serological testing for COVID19 antibodies as one of the ways that we will be able to safely allow people to start to interact more. To have informed public discussions about this, people will need to understand how test “accuracy” works. 🧵
Note 1: There’s a whole separate issue here about how immunity may or may not work and whether the presence of antibodies indicates long(ish)-term immunity. That is not the topic here. I recommend this article.
Note 2: I am not a virologist, an infectious disease doc, nor an epidemiologist. Although I have a background in math & took a lot of epi courses, my PhD was in human factors engineering, focusing on interface design for health information.
I gave a talk this week on things I have learned re: scientific writing. The talk was in French (my language at work) but I thought I’d share here (slides in French, tweets in English) in case it is useful to others.
Thread:
As I presented to those at my talk, what worked for me may or may not work for you, but for whatever they are worth, here are my best tips.
1. Be honest with yourself about your issues.
At one time, I found it easy to say that I wasn’t writing because I was busy. I was definitely busy.
I woke up earlier this morning, saw the date on my clock, and thought of women who were murdered 30 years ago today because a man was angry they were at engineering school. I was a teenager, very good at math & science. Five years later, I started engineering school.
Marking December 6 wasn’t always the national event that it is now, but engineering schools marked it from the beginning. As a female engineering student who could speak French, I was asked on multiple years to hold a white rose, a candle, and say a French name.
I remember the face of my one and only female engineering professor, Dr. Geneviève Dumas. She’s an expert in biomechanics. I interviewed her once for an assignment in my social sciences & humanities elective.
After 36 years of type 1 diabetes (#T1D), the last year or 2 have been tougher than usual. Patterns shifting bit by bit, my old tricks not working so well anymore, hypo unawareness getting worse, lows coming out of nowhere, increasing fear of travel, fear of driving, less energy.
I started using versions of this slide at the start of my talks earlier this year. The unpredictability had started to bleed into my talks. (“Hey, this isn’t a pager, it’s a medical device. It might beep. I might need to check it. I’m not being rude. I can’t turn it off. Sorry.”)
I developed a new side effect of low blood sugar: deep despair that lingers for hours. It’s about as fun as it sounds, sweeping in for a leisurely stay on the heels of brutally disruptive out-of-nowhere lows. I already hated hypos enough.