PROOF! Someone tested the signature verification system in Clark County and it had a 89% failure rate for catching poor signature matches. We have raised concerns about the signature verification system for months. 100s of thousands of mail ballots here.
“Discarded mail ballots cannot just be picked up and voted by anyone,” a fact sheet from the secretary of state’s office says.“ This is false. Bad signatures are slipping through.
Registrar Gloria said “If ballots signed by someone else “came through, we would still have the signature match to rely on for identity,” Asked if he was confident the safeguard would identify those ballots “I’m confident that the process has been working throughout this process”
“He was wrong. Eight of the nine ballots went through. In other words, signature verification had an 89 percent failure rate in catching mismatched signatures.”
“County officials aren’t working proactively to determine whether unscrupulous actors abused this vulnerability in a widespread fashion. Gloria’s office doesn’t “have an investigatory team.””
“He said his office catches fraudulent votes “when they’re reported to us.” So if a criminal doesn’t admit he committed voter fraud, Clark County is unlikely to find out about it. Willful ignorance isn’t an election security strategy.”
(1/7) Must-read piece spotlighting the concerns that George Washington Law Professor Jonathan Turley, a liberal, has about what’s going on with this election. Turley says flatly: "I think it's clear at this point that voting fraud occurred."
(2/7) He says lack of transparency prevents us knowing the problem’s scope: "It’s like not just being asked to guess the number of jellybeans in a jar, but you have to do it without actually seeing the jar. So in order to find systemic problems, you need access to the system.”
(3/7) More from Turley: “There is obviously a record here of dead people voting. There are obviously problems of keeping observers in places where they really couldn’t observe, very effectively. … We wouldn’t know — unless we had greater access to the system itself.”
(1/5) I joined @TuckerCarlson to give an update on voter fraud and irregularities in Clark County, NV. It has been confirmed that a number of dead voters are on the voter rolls who in fact cast ballots in this election.
(2/5) Now, critics of mine like AG Aaron Ford are moving the goal posts – no longer accusing me of producing zero fraud, but of not producing ENOUGH fraud. We all know there’s fraud; we just don’t know how much.
(3/5) All I want is to put a spotlight on this flawed system. We keep being told all the fraud will be investigated. But there’s no independent investigative body that actually goes in and investigates elections – which is why we have this mess!
(1/5) I joined @ShannonBream to discuss major voter irregularities in Clark County, NV. The Registrar unilaterally lowered the signature-matching accuracy standard on the machine used to count ballots to 40 percent — below the recommended setting.
(2/5) AI and computer-vision experts have said that once the factory setting on the machine is removed, it takes months of effort from a massive team with the appropriate expertise to get it back to a reliable standard.
(3/5) 200K signatures were verified using this machine, and no human being went back and verified these. And there are another 400K votes that we have never looked at. No meaningful observation of signature matching is being allowed.
In Las Vegas we have countless examples of loose ballots and bad rolls. We have an avalanche of misdelivered ballots, ballots in the trash, on top of mailboxes, loose in apartment buildings, on the ground. Remember Clark County wont allow observation or challenging of signatures.
(1/4)Today we filed a lawsuit challenging Clark County for its vote by mail signature verification process. The machine and system they use are counting just over 1% of signatures. Other voters in the state are being rejected at a higher rate. sfgate.com/news/article/T…
We are also challenging the fact that we have no meaningful observation of the signature verification process. We also can’t challenge any verified signature. Once the signature is verified, the ballot is forever separated from the voter envelope. Therefore we can never challenge
the nearly 200K signatures already counted and with every passing moment lose the opportunity to make sure real voters are the only ones being counted. We ask the Judge to halt the process until a meaningful signature verification process exist.
(1/8) Nevada’s largest paper, @reviewjournal, is right: @realDonaldTrump has proved to NV & America he deserves 4 more years! “Donald J. Trump stands in forceful contrast to the relentless progressive attacks on this nation … He deserves a second term.”
(2/8) “Mr. Trump entered the Oval Office in 2017 promising to be a disrupting force, to upend Beltway norms. Mission accomplished. … [H]is domestic policy record has been quite traditional — and successful. Voters interested in accomplishments should take notice.”
(3/8) “The most pressing matter facing Nevada and the nation in coming months, and even years, will be the resurrection of the economy post-pandemic. Mr. Trump’s record on job creation and economic growth speaks for itself.”