Share this page!

FREESOIL 🇮🇱 Profile picture
Twitter logo
14 Nov, 4 tweets, 1 min read
1. Females are more susceptible to the authoritarian view of knowledge (credentialism) and safe-feeling consensus-based decision-making.

In a competitive world, this fails and patriarchies win. A successful patriarchal society then lacks competitors,
2. Females are better at navigating and gaining power WITHIN a society. This doesn't mean actually becoming the nominal leaders (though that sometimes happens), but in making kings out of males with authority/consensus elevating males.
3. Thus sufficiently successful patriarchal society becomes credentialized and heavily based on consensus. It then lacks innovation, everything is incompetent, it becomes suffocating and impossible for smart people to do anything b/c they're trapped in a web of difficulty.
4. The feminized (authority-credential-consensus) society gets ripped apart by more dynamic, bureaucratically "primitive" patriarchal societies.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with FREESOIL 🇮🇱

FREESOIL 🇮🇱 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Freesoilyeah

FREESOIL 🇮🇱 Profile picture
2 Nov
@A_J_Kerek @HendricksonAm @charlesmurray Two things:
1. That's conditioning. At no other point in history was any kind of race, clan, ethnic exclusivity that was not just a character / behavior filter, seen as immoral. That's something you had to be taught, and at a young formative age.
@A_J_Kerek @HendricksonAm @charlesmurray 2. Models of ethnocentrism-humanitarianism-individualism models show ethnocentrism always wins. IRL it's more complex, but ethnocentrism still mostly won in most of human history. You're telling people to do something that is evolutionarily disadvantageous.
@A_J_Kerek @HendricksonAm @charlesmurray If you're okay with that, fine. But you're creating a powder-keg kept in place by ideological conditioning. As soon as that lid gets lifted, and people return to baseline, you're gonna have something bad.

The solution is SOOO simple. Just keep em' separated.
Read 7 tweets
FREESOIL 🇮🇱 Profile picture
1 Nov
@BoyleLab "linking race to any traits" - you're futzing up the issue.

There are clearly different populations, they differ genetically. Whether they meet X level of heterozygosity or clusteredness for you to class as "race" or "subspecies" or whatever is irrelevant.
@BoyleLab How bout this: is it possible for Azerbaijanis and Latvians to have differences in genetic behavioral tendencies? Of course it is.

The fact that Azerbaijanis and Latvians are/are-not separate "races" is completely immaterial to answering any questions about that.
@BoyleLab For you to then say "But Azerbaijanis and Latvians only have blippity poo poo overall Fst distance" or to suddenly wax philosophical "do Latvians or Azerbaijanis even really exist" doesn't help answer the question regarding the cause of behavioral differences if there are any.
Read 5 tweets
FREESOIL 🇮🇱 Profile picture
28 Oct
@CanonLuv @JoeNBC You have a religion based on hating white people, which may include yourself, that's upheld by blood libels, and any questioning of them is called "hate speech" and you treat any skepticism as heresy and now you treat the least racist race in human history as the most racist.
@CanonLuv @JoeNBC And it wouldn't be so bad if you just wanted to destroy yourself. That's fine, go to Africa and be ruled by Africans. Bon voyage. The problem is you want to force it onto other people who just want to be free from you and your delusions you get from people who are always wrong.
@CanonLuv @JoeNBC Hopefully the polling fail of 2016 is maybe a little crack in your faith in authorities. An objective, undeniable test-and-prediction where the data can't be fudged. Such opportunities are rare. And at that time, the polling outfits that got it the most wrong were academic ones.
Read 5 tweets
FREESOIL 🇮🇱 Profile picture
19 Oct
@CaPilarious @tina_patel @Me2S3M @CBSLA Yeah that's all made up. Current institutions are losing confidence, and they just blast a claim that Russia's doing it. That's what authoritarian regimes do - they try to externalize the discontent. There's no "shoring up" institutions at this point.
@CaPilarious @tina_patel @Me2S3M @CBSLA There's no pathway for meaningful reform, which YOU would oppose anyway. Like what, replace 99% of the staff of the NYT and execute Carlos Slim for treason? Anything much short of that won't do anything. No, it's FUBAR.
@CaPilarious @tina_patel @Me2S3M @CBSLA People voted for Trump to try to destroy these institutions and build anew. But as we've seen, even literally winning the presidency, fighting both the GOP, Dems, shit-for-brains like you, institutional media and tech, the bureaucracy just blocks everything.
Read 6 tweets
FREESOIL 🇮🇱 Profile picture
15 Sep
@LotusMachine2 I didn't say you were but things like "is X 'democracy'?" is lolbert language and thought patterns. Thinking "democracy" is a meaningful concept, unless you're referring to something formal that happens to be called "democracy", is part of that useless axiomatic thinking
@LotusMachine2 If you seriously ever ask if something is "democratic", you've now snapped the complexity of the world into something dubious, and then the symbol manipulation begins where the symbols take on a life of their own disconnected from the more ambiguous thing they roughly refer to
@LotusMachine2 And as you pile on more and more of these axioms and engage in more symbol manipulation, you seek consistency and "rationality" of these symbols when the world as it is has no obligation to be consistent or rational according to your evaluation. And this leads to lolbertism.
Read 4 tweets
FREESOIL 🇮🇱 Profile picture
9 Sep
@MbnCringeBox @b_l_r_p @settlerslament There is no "right-wing", there's just big causes and the kinds of people who get swept up in big causes. What is today called "right wing" are just people who either aren't being swept up in the current big cause, or are with some other minor cause.
@MbnCringeBox @b_l_r_p @settlerslament The kinds of people who get swept up into causes were christians, nazis, communists, and now whatever the fuck the current unnamed big cause is. "Justice progressive liberalism utopia of eternal bliss and everything that is good"ism.
@MbnCringeBox @b_l_r_p @settlerslament And predisposition for getting swept up into a cause is largely heritable, and "left-wing" people, a proxy for being a cause person, have had lower fertilies than "right-wing" people for as long as that has been measured, meaning people in the middle ages were more
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get email notifications when new thread is out from this Author!

Check out other threads from this Author!

Read all threads by @Freesoilyeah